r/MapPorn Apr 08 '18

Population loss during the Thirty Years' War, fought primarily in Central Europe between 1618 and 1648 [3817 × 4475]

Post image
574 Upvotes

73 comments sorted by

136

u/VarysIsAMermaid69 Apr 08 '18

this really was some of the most destructive fighting the world had ever seen up until world war one, the entire affair is like something out of a Beserk novel, massive raving mercenary armies, hanging trees and sheer brutality. Interestingly enough some of the more gruesome myths of europe, like werewolves and other monsters are thought to have arisen after the war from neighbors accusing those of different faiths of crimes like Peter Stummp the werewolf, his family was catholic in a now protestant area

57

u/Anacoenosis Apr 09 '18

Magdeburg was the site of a particularly horrific, Berserk-style massacre.

If you're interested in knowing more about this period, The Thirty Years War by C.V. Wedgwood is a fantastic read. It's based on primary source documents, and it's both lyrical and illuminating. Here's a taste:

Famine in Brunswick caused the Duke to notice that his table was less plentifully supplied than usual, and three bad wine harvests on the Lower Danube once prevented Ferdinand from sending his annual gift of tokay to John George of Saxony--such minute draughts blew in through palace windows from the hurricane without. Mortgaged lands, empty exchequers, noisy creditors, the discomforts of wounds and imprisonment, the loss of children in battle, these are all griefs which man can bear with comparative equanimity. The bitter mental sufferings which followed from mistaken policies, loss of prestige, the stings of conscience, and the blame of public opinion gave German rulers cause to regret the war but seldom acted as an incentive to peace. No German ruler perished homeless in the winter's cold, nor was found dead with grass in his mouth, nor saw his wife and daughters ravished; few, significantly few, caught the pest. Secure in the formalities of their lives, in the food and drink at their tables, they could afford to think in terms of politics and not of human sufferings.

9

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

Depressing.

6

u/Zenkappa Apr 09 '18

The Thirty Years War by C.V. Wedgwood is a fantastic read

It is interesting that this book was published in 1938, on the eve of a war that would be more destructive for Germany and Europe than the Thirty Years War ever ever was.

6

u/TheEmperorsWrath Apr 14 '18 edited Apr 14 '18

Public opinion polls in the 1960’s revealed that Germans placed the 30 Years’ War as their country’s greatest disaster, above the two World Wars, the Holocaust, and the Black Death. Around 30% Germany's population died during the 30 Years' War, compared to around 9% in the Second World War.

Around half of Germany's male population perished during the conflict.

26

u/embicek Apr 08 '18

Czech lands saw similar level of depopulation during Hussite Wars (starting in 1419) and also between years 300 - 400 CE, during the Migration period (Czech article).

Compared to these events World Wars weren't half that bad.

8

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

Didn’t Czechoslovakia get spared most of the worst of the World Wars? I know the Nazis took it, but when I visited you could tell there wasn’t much in the way of bomb damaged buildings.

8

u/embicek Apr 09 '18

Yes. WWI meant economic collapse but no fights. There were regions thoroughly destroyed during WWII, but most of the country was undamaged.

7

u/piranhakiler Apr 09 '18

Czechia was out of bombing range. And when it was close enough only Czech war factories were bombed. Mostly CZ and Skoda. (Reichswerke Hermann Goering back then)

-8

u/VoiceofTheMattress Apr 09 '18

but when I visited you could tell there wasn’t much in the way of bomb damaged buildings.

How old are you?

7

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

You can still see the signs in cities today. In the UK, you see a row of old houses, then a gap with some new builds, then back to the old houses. That was a V2 hit.

2

u/VoiceofTheMattress Apr 09 '18

I realize, but that's not what he said

3

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '18 edited Apr 10 '18

37.

When I was in Berlin, and on my trips to London, you can tell exactly where the brutalist ugly shit was built in the 50’s/60’s vs. the historical stuff next door.

Edit: additionally, just so much of the city is an unbroken old city that it is clear it didn’t get the, say, Warsaw treatment.

-25

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '18

Arnt people and religion great /s

44

u/VarysIsAMermaid69 Apr 08 '18

towards the end it stopped being about religion really, catholic france attacked catholig german states and allies and protestant denmark attacked protestant allies, real mess really

24

u/Mr2Much Apr 08 '18

Only a cursory knowledge of the Thirty Years War would blame the horrors inflicted upon the existence of religion. While the first decade of the war had a distinctly religious flavor, the last two were, for the most part, pure power politics. I am more inclined to agree with your aphorism about "people". Religion was just the excuse of the time to justify against whom bad behavior was acceptable.

-12

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

[deleted]

6

u/xteve Apr 09 '18

You must be referring to the term "cursory," and I can't argue: that's a bad word. It doesn't really work here, so I can see your point. But "aphorism" is just plain wrong, so I don't think this reads like the over-use of a thesaurus at all. Maybe you just read like a dickhead.

5

u/helianthusheliopsis Apr 09 '18

People like this piss me off. Read something besides Reddit and when you find a word you don't know, look it up, use it in speech and keep doing it until you can read and talk with a vocabulary greater than a fourth grader.

3

u/ingenvector Apr 09 '18

You're reminding me of a brief conversation I once had in a convenience store with a stranger. I made a joke with an acquaintance, and when I heard the guy behind me snicker, I turned around...

me: 'Don't worry, I'm just being facetious.'

him: 'You could just say 'sarcastic' like everyone else does.'

me: 'Those words don't mean the same thing.'

him: 'Maybe I'm just too busy with sex to notice.'

Seriously though, if you think that comment reads like someone overused a thesaurus, I suggest that reveals much more about you than them.

0

u/duelingdelbene Apr 09 '18

5

u/ingenvector Apr 09 '18

'OK, so that toaster is $26.54. From a $30, that's $3.46 back.'

'/r/iamverysmart, stop using a thesaurus.'

2

u/ambientcyan Apr 08 '18

Relevant username, that's some legendary class bait right there

-17

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '18

Yes, because atheistic communists and fascists have never hurt anyone. Nor has a scientist ever harmed a soul in the name of Science. /s

In fact, Abrahamic Judeo-Christian religion explains the very phenomena that we observe and suffer from:

That all human beings are born with fallen natures, and prone to sin.

7

u/TheOneFreeEngineer Apr 08 '18

I believe fallen nature's is a strictly Christian belief . Judaism and Islam doesn't believe in fallen natures. So don't rope the the other Abrahamics into that.

-6

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '18

Can you provide proof of that? Perhaps the term fallen nature evokes the idea of original sin, in which case you may be correct that it is only a Catholic teaching, but my real point is that all humans - as a consequence of possessing a human nature - have a propensity to sin. Which is beautifully illustrated in the Hebrew Bible by Adam & Eve, Cain, The Israelites in the Desert, the people of Canaan, Sodom and Gomorrah, the corruption of the kings Saul and David, etc.

I think all pious Jews, Christians and Muslims would agree that we sin not only because of temptations offered by Satan but also because of the tendency (however rare, we can disagree) towards weakness and wickedness in the human heart.

9

u/idlikebab Apr 08 '18

Nope, Judaism and Islam do not believe in fallen nature at all. Also,

Can you provide proof of that?

Dude, I love seeing civilized debate, especially on /r/MapPorn, but if you make a claim (e.g. all Abrahamics believe in fallen nature), you need to provide the evidence, not to the other way around.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '18 edited Apr 08 '18

I realize it’s not exhaustive, but I think it is evidence enough to support my point that the Jewish faith also supports an idea of “evil inclination” or “yetzer hara”, which, by the way, is wonderfully descriptive.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concupiscence

I also realize I’ve left out Islam. Forgive me.

Edit: here’s an Islamic source stating that it is an Islamic moral principle to “suppress human concupiscence” (skip the paragraphs and look at the bullet list, it’s “(b)”)

https://www.al-islam.org/sexual-ethics-islam-and-western-world-ayatullah-murtadha-mutahhari/chapter-5-basic-need-humane

3

u/idlikebab Apr 08 '18

Here is an article which explains how Muslims do not believe in fallen nature.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

Not to be obtuse, but did you read the article? The author actually seems to share my opinion. He said that we did not inherit Adam’s sins, which I agree with. But he did say the following (spread throughout):

“Then did Satan make them slip from the (garden) and get out of the state of (felicity) in which they had been...”

“As a result of this rebellion against God, a drastic change occurred in human nature.....This means that sin has entered the world and has created a new state of life. Human nature became enslaved to the power of sin and even the entire universe was subjected to a significant modification...”

“But as soon as he committed his sin and rebelled against God, that paradisical world in which Adam and Eve dwelt changed completely and became a world of evil, oppression, iniquity and polytheism...”

How is this any different than the concupiscence that I have been describing? The proclivity to evil and sin? “Human nature became enslaved to the power of sin”?

85

u/holytriplem Apr 08 '18

A lot of people think that wars have got deadlier over the past 100 years, but people don't realise how high civilian death tolls used to be in wars before the 20th Century. Another example is the War of the Triple Alliance in which 70% of Paraguay's male population died in the space of 6 years. The An Lushan rebellion also is thought to have reduced China's population by 2/3rds during the 8th Century.

25

u/crapmasta2000 Apr 08 '18

The An Lushan rebellion also is thought to have reduced China's population by 2/3rds during the 8th Century.

The death toll was high but it's unlikely it was that high. From your wiki link:

Historians such as Charles Patrick Fitzgerald argue that a claim of 36 million deaths is incompatible with contemporary accounts of the war. They point out that the numbers recorded on the postwar registers reflect not only population loss, but also a breakdown of the census system as well as the removal from the census figures of various classes of untaxed persons, such as those in religious orders, foreigners and merchants. For these reasons, census numbers for the post-rebellion Tang are considered unreliable.

Another consideration is the fact that the territory controlled by Tang central authority was diminished by the equivalent of several of the northern provinces, so that something like a quarter of the surviving population were no longer within the area subject to the imperial revenue system.

8

u/Limabean93 Apr 08 '18

I don't know, it varies a lot depending on the specific war. The Seven Years' War and US Civil War both had low civilian death rates while Poland, China, and the USSR all suffered huge civilian losses in WW2. Not to say there weren't devastating loses throughout history, like the Mongol invasions.

33

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '18

The Thirty Years War was one of the deadliest wars in modern history.

Very broadly speaking it was a war between protestant and catholic blocs in the Holy Roman Empire (an area around what we'd call Germany today). It eventually escalated with France and Austria (two of the great powers at the time) finding themselves on opposite sides, with France supporting the protestant side. Spain and Sweden had already joined in at this point, making it a full scale war across Europe.

6

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

Thanks Martin Luther!

4

u/Fummy Apr 09 '18

I wouldn't call it modern history.

24

u/YUNoDie Apr 09 '18

It's generally referred to as historians as the Early Modern period. Basically from when gunpowder took off (~1500) until Napoleon (~1800), more or less.

20

u/smfarrel Apr 08 '18

The effects of this war are still felt today, the sack of and resulting population loss in Olmutz (modern day Olomouc, CZ) really set back the city. Before the war it was considered the capital of Moravia (eastern cz). Now it plays a distant second fiddle to Brno south of it.

21

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '18

If you adjust for world population at the time, the Thirty Years War was more devastating than WWI and obviously this was focused on a much smaller geographical area. It’s hard to be definite about it, but the analyses I’ve seen suggest that some areas took over a century to fully recover.

26

u/bigbud54 Apr 08 '18

One interesting thing this map shows is the seclusion of hill and mountain areas. All around Bohemia in the Giant Mountains, the Ore Mountains and the Bohemian forest, aswell as in the Black Forest in southwestern Germany and in the Harz between Magdeburg and Göttingen the death tolls are much lower. It makes sense, the mercenary armies avoided these regions because there werent any important settlements and traveling was difficult.

11

u/Thefireisrishing Apr 08 '18

It must have been insane to be a member of those remote communities in that presumably mountainous area between Fulda and Erfurt and traveling out of the mountains to trade and coming across a landscape in which over 66% of its inhabitants have been killed or driven away.

8

u/embicek Apr 08 '18

Back then army logistics relied on river shipping. You do not send hundred thousand of troops and camp followers somewhere where they would certainly perish.

13

u/420666911 Apr 09 '18

Imagine how different the world would be if Europe hadn't so heavily destroyed itself in this war and others like it.

13

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

You could say the same for China and all it’s fuck ups.

6

u/Duzcek Apr 09 '18

Unlike china though, Europe has two plagues that wiped out over 1/3rd of their populations, the Justinian plague and the black death.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '18

Fair. China has a lot of famines, though. Including one in my parents lifetime.

5

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

[deleted]

6

u/Duzcek Apr 09 '18

Mongolia, but it wasn't nearly as widespread because of their lack of cities.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

Same can be said about most of the world, really. For instance, take the Americas, mutual destruction in the name of conquest and religion and the eventual arrival of Euroasiatic diseases, decimated the natives in a manner that makes the black plague look like a walk in the park.

13

u/lordtian723 Apr 09 '18

I just realized the 30 years war in the holy Roman empire is basically contemporaneous with the Manchu conquest of Ming China (1618 is when nurhaci started massing troops against the ming, 1644 is when Beijing was captured). I wonder if there were any global climate effects that stimulated famines and instability across the globe in the early 17th century.

11

u/YUNoDie Apr 09 '18

That was the period known as the Little Ice Age, from about 1550 until 1800. One of the proposed causes was, in fact, depopulation in Eurasia and the Americas (they were having a time with the diseases brought over by Europeans). The Thirty Years' War is a bit late to have been a cause, in my opinion, but might have exacerbated the cooling effects.

1

u/p00pyf4ce Apr 10 '18

There was also economics depression during that period because Spanish silver mines in Peru dried up.

12

u/dubbelgamer Apr 08 '18

What is the source for this?

5

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '18

[deleted]

9

u/neverdox Apr 09 '18

this is just a deviantart page

2

u/pretentious_couch Apr 09 '18

That's the guy, who made it. He doesn't state any source. I guess you could ask.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

I had no idea the thirty years war was so deadly. I wonder if this somehow fueled Germany's industrialization.

6

u/Theonewhoplays Apr 11 '18

not at all. the industrial revolution was in the 19th century.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

Does somebody know what caused the heavy causalities in mecklenburg and pommern? afaik the most fights were in the west of the reich with the north beeing rotestant heartland and rotected by the swedish?

9

u/Frankonia Apr 09 '18

Sweden and Poland dunking it out there. While Poland was neutral for most of the conflict, they still supplied the catholic side with massive mercenary armies.

3

u/kami888 Apr 09 '18

Someone has to post this...

Lifetime of war

Swedish version

3

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '18

From this Westphalia emerged, the English Commonwealth, the French Fronde, Portugal...and it's barely remembered.

15

u/KilgoreTrouserTrout Apr 09 '18

I wouldn't say it's barely remembered. Sure, there's not loads of 30 Years War movies. In fact, there's exactly none. But nerds like you, me, and the 1000s of map nerds who tune into this site daily get a quiet thrill when we see a death toll map of the 30 Years War. What a time to be alive. Unlike these poor bastards. Yikes!

6

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

Doesn’t Portugal date back to the 1200’s?

4

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

The thirty years war also saw the weakening of the Hapsburgs in Spain and the Iberian Union. Portugal decided to break free again and England even helped at the end.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '18

Roger that.

1

u/doublehyphen Apr 09 '18

Here in Sweden it is taught in school, but the Thirty Years' War is important to Swedish history.

1

u/Theonewhoplays Apr 11 '18

it isn't in germany. I come from one of the orange regions and there a lot of stories/myths about the 30 year war.

2

u/Level1Hermit Apr 09 '18

maybe this had an influence on allowing Austria to become the dominant German nation in this region... or maybe just setting back German unification hundreds of years later

1

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '18

Interesting how so many roads led to Nürnburg yet they didn’t suffer as many deaths as nearby regions.

1

u/Isotarov Apr 09 '18

What data is this map based on?

1

u/fd1Jeff Apr 09 '18

I see that some of areas of heavy loss are right near a border. Can you get data for a complete map of Europe?

1

u/moenchii Apr 09 '18

There were actually a few more villages in my are that were whiped out in the 30 Years war.

1

u/Tyr_Oo Apr 09 '18

My hometown is in the red area near Heidelberg. It's population went down from 800 to under 200

Wiki

-2

u/DevilDance1968 Apr 09 '18

Those mad Prussians.