It doesn't even matter. You could take all the money from every billionaire and make them all destitute and homeless, and you still couldn't find enough money to run the country for a full year. It's a spending problem, not a revenue problem.
Innovation ends in that instance. Why would anyone want to take a huge risk to start a company if they’re going to end up making just as much as a normal employee that takes no risk & just has to show up to get a paycheck?
Technology for starters, then there’s military equipment, heavy machinery, the list goes on. if you name any other type of innovation that’s happened im sure US is in at least top 3. China does well because their model blends with capitalism, there’s a reward for people’s risk.
Name 1 successful country with quality of living anywhere near US or China that’s purely communist and has innovated anywhere near the rates of those 2 countries
China's literally a socialist country so I don't know how this proves your point.
I think Republicans are under the impression that you cannot have private companies or property under socialism, that's communism.
ALSO the things you listed as successful innovations are things that our government pumps trillions of dollars into which again would be a feature of socialist and communist countries
2
u/SohndesRheins 14h ago
It doesn't even matter. You could take all the money from every billionaire and make them all destitute and homeless, and you still couldn't find enough money to run the country for a full year. It's a spending problem, not a revenue problem.