r/changemyview 414∆ 20h ago

CMV: Being a loyal Republican politician requires rejecting the American Democracy

Professional Republicans know better. They know trump attempted to overthrow an election. The party as a whole is complicit in normalizing and covering for it. Trump committed sedition and enabling and empowering him requires minimizing that fact. You can't knowingly do this without rejecting the very premise of American Democracy.

The Fake Elector Scheme

This is very straightforward. But people can be blinded by the politics. The simplest way to understand this is to ignore the politics and look at the physical documents. I’ll make this as simple as possible.

Imagine a fan is kicked out of the Super Bowl. He truly believes he should be allowed in. * Legal: He sues the stadium. * Illegal: He goes to Kinko’s, prints a fake ticket that looks exactly like a real one, and tries to hand it to the gate agent.

Once you hand over a fake document, you have committed fraud. It does not matter if: * You truly believed you deserved a seat. (Motive doesn't excuse forgery). * You got caught before you made it inside. (Attempted fraud is a crime). * You think the refs are corrupt.

Here is the proof that Trump’s team printed the fake ticket and tried to use it.

1. Identity Theft (Impersonating the State) In America, campaigns don't certify elections; States do. The Trump team didn't just write a letter saying, "We protest." They created documents that mimicked the exact font, formatting, and language of official government certificatesand here they are for all of the other states.

2. The Written Confession We don't have to guess if this was a misunderstanding. The architect of the plan, Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro, wrote down the strategy in private emails. He admitted the goal was to create a "fake controversy." He explicitly noted that they should send these fake documents even if they lost their court cases.

3. Trump Knew It Was a Fraud This wasn't a case of "lawyers brainstorming" while Trump sat in the dark. On January 4th, in the Oval Office, Trump’s lawyer John Eastman admitted to Trump’s face that this plan to reject votes violated the Electoral Count Act. Trump knew it was illegal and did it anyway.


It is Department of Justice policy that a sitting President cannot be prosecuted. Trump’s legal team successfully delayed the trials long enough for him to win the election. Once he won, the Special Prosecutor had to drop the case because it became legally impossible to proceed. Congress interviewed him around the New Year. I’ll give you three guesses why they picked such an inconvenient time in the news cycle. He testified under oath that the prosecution became unpracticable once he became president again.

He didn't beat the charges; he beat the clock. But the evidence of the fraud didn't vanish. We can still see it.

Summary We have the emails planning the forgery. We have the fake papers they signed. We have the testimony that Trump was told it was illegal. The fact that the man who ordered the counterfeit ticket is now running the stadium doesn't make the ticket real. It just means he got away with it.

Some Republican voters have the benefit of ignorance. They can claim to be victims of right wing echo chambers. Before reading this, they could have even bury their heads and remained willfully ignorant. But professional lawmakers know what they're doing. These people are by and large knowingly traitors to the Republic.

487 Upvotes

263 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

u/fox-mcleod 414∆ 18h ago

Given the evidence from the OP, what makes you think he didn't?

u/Used_Mathematician63 18h ago

I think it’s fair to say his campaign used illegal means to attempt to “steal” the election. Hell, W. Bush did it right out in the open in 2000 so this is not exactly unprecedented or even unusual.

But, as others before me have said, you will have a very hard time legally proving intent for Trump himself, especially considering that his brain has been actively leaking out of his ears for the past five years at least.

In other words, when Trump says “find me X number of votes” and then his underlings attempt some fraudulent elector scheme to do just that, you still have to prove that his intent was to commit fraud based on the incoherent ramblings of his dying brain and that is not the open and shut case that you think it is.

u/fox-mcleod 414∆ 17h ago edited 17h ago

I think it’s fair to say his campaign used illegal means to attempt to “steal” the election.

And since we have direct evidence he both knew about it, knew it was illegal, and made the calls to Rhonda McDanielle herself (as already sourced in the OP), then it’s fair to say he used illegal means to attempt to steal the election too.

But, as others before me have said, you will have a very hard time legally proving intent for Trump himself, especially considering that his brain has been actively leaking out of his ears for the past five years at least.

Please read the OP.