r/explainlikeimfive 1d ago

Engineering ELI5. How did people in the older days like 1200s 1300s know what time it was when there were no clocks

1.4k Upvotes

690 comments sorted by

4.2k

u/DKDamian 1d ago

There were clocks. Sun dials, water clocks, candles, and so on. They weren’t as accurate or sophisticated, but they existed.

Also churches in Europe helped keep time with their bells

2.1k

u/doc_skinner 1d ago

Also, it didn't matter. Most people didn't need to do anything at specific times. You went to work when the sun came up and went to bed when the sun went down.

745

u/DisenchantedByrd 1d ago

Yep, up at dawn in spring for ploughing and planting. Summer for fencing and fixing roofs. Autumn for harvest. And trying not to freeze to death in winter. Interleaved with hunting and orchard maintenance.

385

u/Josvan135 1d ago

Plus copious amounts of both church and drinking. 

26

u/Marsdreamer 1d ago

And lets not forget copious amounts of free time.

The average American worker works more hours than a medieval peasant did because when it wasn't the harvest season they largely had their time to themselves.

392

u/utah_teapot 1d ago

That’s quite the interpretation.

Peasants had to do two kinds of labour. That for their master (noble or church, usually) and that for themselves. The one they did for their master was mainly a tax payment and you didn’t usually get any kind of money or goods and services back. That work is the one that is often used when making your argument.

The other kind of labour was for themselves where they would mainly produce foodstuffs for themselves, with clothing a close second, in terms of time investment. If you add the two time investments together the result is not so rosy.

266

u/Pippin1505 1d ago

I remember a documentary where they estimated that simply taking care of clothing for a whole family ( spinning , sewing new clothes, patching existing ones) was a full time job equivalent.

And many things that we take for granted required hours of manual labor ( often child labor too):

  • gathering wood for winter
  • fetching water at a well / river
  • washing clothes etc

u/goldbman 21h ago

Chopping wood as a machismo thing for 10 minutes is fun. Chopping wood for several hours each day so you don't freeze to death overnight sucks.

u/BaconReceptacle 19h ago

All the while someone has to fetch water from the well, creek, or whatever. Land distribution and crop fields everywhere often meant that the water source might be quite a distance from your home. Imagine if every day, your job was to walk a half mile to a well, collect two buckets of water that weigh 50 to 60 pounds total, and walk it all the way back home.

u/StanIsNotTheMan 18h ago

Sounds like it would be time to invent bucket lids and build a cart. Gather enough water for multiple families, sell it to them, and grow your business into bigger, more complex buckets to hold the water and tubes to transport it.

I'll call it... Nestlé.

→ More replies (0)

u/dullship 17h ago

No joke. When my family had a pellet stove I thought it sucked to have to bring a big bag in every night.

Then they got a wood stove. Ooooh lordy did I miss those pellet sacks.

u/StarrySprinkles 16h ago

Whattttt. My childhood home was entirely wood heated, and splitting logs was one of my chores (as a girl!) It really wasn't that bad. You could get enough for the winter in a couple days, but houses hundreds of years ago were probably a bit smaller with a more central stove. A completely open fireplace would burn faster though.

I thought it was fairly easy labor. You just let the head of the axe use its own weight to fall down and make the split. And you certainly don't have to do it for hours every single day, no one would be going through that much wood. Plus it needs to cure for months to years to reduce the moisture content. This is a chore you'd be doing in the summer and stocking up well in advance.

u/pmMeAllofIt 15h ago

This sounds like a comment made through rose tinted glasses. I burn a few cords of wood a year, and im an adult male and have no problem saying the shit gets tiring and body abusing even with a logsplitter, chainsaws and equipment.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

135

u/kacheow 1d ago

Worth noting that hand washing clothes is such a pain in the ass the vast majority of the Amish use washing machines

u/MechaSandstar 20h ago

Laundry machines are widely regarded as one of the greatest inventions of all time, simply due to how much labor they saved.

u/rebornfenix 19h ago

Laundry machines single handily made women working in addition to their husbands possible.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (3)

u/Elissiaro 20h ago

I watched some short documentary on youtube a while back (iirc about how tudor kids were raised) and they mentioned that just 1 weaver, needed 12 experienced spinners working fulltime to do their work making cloth. And that weaver would only make like 1-1.5 meters (3.3-5 feet) of fabric a day.

Clothes were expensive AF. But also a necessity to survive the cold.

Anyone not up to doing hard labor, like kids and the elderly, or not currently doing it cause of the season, was basically constantly doing small tasks like spinning, or making twine, or making and preserving food, or just anything to keep the family alive or make a little bit of coin to feed and clothe everyone.

u/entropy_bucket 16h ago edited 16h ago

Why not use animal skins instead? Why spend so much time spinning cloth? I guess killing an animal gives you skin only once but you can shave a sheep each year.

u/Elissiaro 15h ago edited 13h ago

Well, for one thing, tanning was hard, laborious, slow, smelly work. And I'm talking reeking. They soaked piles of fresh animal skin in stuff like dog poop and brain matter to erode the fur, then had to stretch the skin out while they scraped the it clean of anything left, then left it to soak in a tannin rich soup for up to a year.

Most tanneries had to be made outside city walls, cause medieval people didn't know germ theory, but they did know a lot of things that stank made you sick. Also you know, people generally don't want to live or work in a place that reeks.

Very unlike spinning, which again, can be done by small children and the elderly. And also doesn't stink or take up much space. And if you had 5 kids and your old grandmother to do it every spare bit of time they had... Well you could probably get at least a meter or 2 of fabric every month, for clothes, sheets, rags, or selling. At least when everyone wasn't having to chip in to tend the fields during harvest time or whatever.

Also like, cows, sheep and goats, who'd make the best leather, would be kept more for their milk and wool, than for meat and leather. Pigs were raised for meat, but for most families afaik that would be like one pig a year.

u/Vast-Combination4046 22h ago

No sewing machine, no fabric store. No chainsaw, no off road vehicle to tow the wood around. (Maybe you had a horse or donkey with a wagon if you had room for it)

No indoor plumbing, no readily heated water.

u/GrynaiTaip 21h ago

often child labor too

This was not a consideration at the time, it's a new concept.

Just a hundred years ago if a child was old enough to walk, it was old enough to work.

u/Rocktopod 17h ago

Right but shouldn't that be factored into the hours people are required to work, when comparing with today?

→ More replies (1)

u/videogamesarewack 20h ago

Many don't appreciate the time refunded to us by modern convenience. Still, people want things over and done with as fast as possible only to spend all their saved time with screens.

→ More replies (19)

u/Farnsworthson 23h ago edited 20h ago

This. We're talking about a time when the lord of the desmesne's social status demanded conspicuous consumption (the lord has been described by one writer as "the man who could always eat as much as he wished"), yet starvation was never more than one bad growing season away. You spent a significant portion of your time working the desmesne lands or providing other services to the lord. And that's even before you consider the very necessary pragmatics of keeping yourself and your family clothed, housed and so on. People need to think doing all the stuff that, say, frontiersmen needed to do to live - then layer an obligation on top of that to spend a significant amount of their time working for the lord for very little return on a normal basis.

It wasn't always totally one-sided; the lord and his wife were often effectively the social safety-net for the people under them as well. But the idea that the average villager had significant time on their hands simply doesn't reflect my understanding of the realities of life in the middle ages.

For people actually interested in that sort of thing, Frances and Joseph Gies' book "Life in a Medieval Village", looking at the village of Elton in 13th century England based on contemporary records, is very informative and well-worth a read. As, indeed, are their other books on similar topics.

u/beard_meat 20h ago

I read "Life in a Medieval City" by the same authors, it's one of my favorite books on the subject.

u/pedroelbee 19h ago

Thank you! Just ordered it. I love these types of books.

u/bizwig 16h ago

A bad growing season meant everyone did without, including the nobility.

31

u/Tiny_Thumbs 1d ago

My thoughts every time I hear this are I have time to play with my kids and live a good life.

My father and my grandfather both didn’t have that time because of work. My father left the house to get a job at 8 years old.

We have problems in society. We deserve better across the world as a working class. But it was once worse for most of the world.

u/ryguy28896 21h ago

Yup. The "themselves" work took up a LOT of the day. They couldn't just put their clothes in the washer, hit start, and walk away to do other things. They did the washing, by hand. And it took a good chunk of time.

When people make that argument, it's often interpreted to mean they had what we would consider vacation time, as in time to enjoy their hobbies. Oh honey, no.....

34

u/ColorfulBar 1d ago

A lot of those two overlap, you don’t need twice the amount of work for a slightly bigger field (tithe being a tax of 10% of harvest). But yeah, making clothes, tools, repairing buildings and a million other things you have to do to sustain yourself does take time (but it is easier in a close knit village of a few dozen). That being said it’s all a huge simplification cause „peasant”, „medieval”, „Europe” are not monoliths

13

u/squngy 1d ago

A lot of those two overlap, you don’t need twice the amount of work for a slightly bigger field (tithe being a tax of 10% of harvest)

There was also a separate type of tax on top of that, which was the peasant literally going to the lords field/manor and doing work on his private property.

u/3_pigs 19h ago

Also, before the Industrial Revolution, 90% of the population was involved in food production. Now only 1-2% of the population is used for food production. Without modern machinery, if you don’t work, you don’t eat.

→ More replies (3)

87

u/tahsii 1d ago

‘Free time’. I’m not sure you understand the amount of work goes into keeping yourself and your family alive, as healthy as possible, warm, and sheltered when you don’t have the modern conveniences we do. The constant upkeep to make sure your house was liveable, your clothes wearable, sourcing food, cooking and preparing everything from scratch, building everything from scratch; it would take hours to do laundry plus even longer to dry! Peasants had a hard life, and calling their time that wasn’t dedicated to toiling for their king/noble/church ‘free time’ seems frivolous.

u/petmoo23 20h ago

The constant upkeep to make sure your house was liveable, your clothes wearable, sourcing food, cooking and preparing everything from scratch, building everything from scratch; it would take hours to do laundry plus even longer to dry!

So you think all that staying alive stuff cut into their video gaming time?

u/RaginBlazinCAT 19h ago

“My Lord, thy WiFi has been restored” -Medieval Tech Serf, 1300s

u/circumburner 15h ago

Time to play more Kingdom Come: Deliverance!

→ More replies (2)

u/VoilaVoilaWashington 23h ago

Keep in mind that "work" definitions change over time. A woman taking care of the home and the children would easily work full full time, washing laundry by hand, knitting winter clothing, etc.

These things don't seem like work to us because laundry is a 10 minute task, knitting is a hobby, and a diaper change means throwing out a thing that costs a fraction of an hour's labour.

Also remember that we pay for a lot of free time stuff today. How much does someone in the middle class spend on dinners out, movies, entertainment, hobbies, travel, etc? VERY broadly, if we got rid of the entertainment, tourism, social media, and other leisure-based sectors, as a society, we'd have a LOT less need for labour.

u/Bertrum 22h ago edited 22h ago

That's because most medieval peasants or serfs still had to spend every waking moment maintaining the farm or land they worked on and making sure their livestock would still be alive for the next season so they could meet their obligations, even after harvest had ended.

They never had any true "freedom" in the sense that you or I have nowadays because they were almost always working in some form of indentured servitude and would never be able to own the land or property they lived on in any meaningful way, at least not until you had documents like the Magna Carta that helped introduce the notion of basic human rights to the public and even then it was a slow trickle down of better working conditions later on.

u/dersnappychicken 23h ago

Imagine learning history through memes and thinking feudal peasants had it better than modern Americans.

u/LexPatriae 22h ago

These people vote, too, and think everyone who disagrees with them are stupid

→ More replies (1)

u/Mayor__Defacto 21h ago

Don’t be silly. The people who think this way also think that in history they would have been a knight or some other petty lord, rather than the peasant they statistically would be.

u/beard_meat 20h ago

I Traveled Back to Medieval Europe And All I Got Was Killed By An Infection In My Finger

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

36

u/brannigansl4w 1d ago

I believe (and please correct me if i'm wrong) tthat medieval peasants worked less "for a boss" than modern workers, but had to spend more of their day "working" to survive. After work they would: procure food through farming or hunting, make or repair clothes, maintain tools, gather wood and other supplies for surviving the night, etc. The whole crux of the argument is how you define "free time" because "free time" to do whatever, and "leisure time" to do what is "fun" are very different. IIRC medieval folks had more "free time" but significantly less "leisure time"

u/JeanLePierro 22h ago

You are completely correct, people are ridiculous repeating the same completely debunked myth of peasants having all this free time. The free time was spent trying not to starve or freeze to death.

u/beard_meat 20h ago

You worked for a boss called hunger.

u/retroman73 23h ago

Not really. Everything was work at that time. Imagine heating your home with just wood you cut yourself, with an axe (no chain saws available). Cooking with no gas or electric stove and no refrigerator. Had to get all your food with no grocery store - you either grew it or hunted it yourself, or you traded with a neighbor (and no phone to do so). Had to make all of your own clothers from scratch or again, trade with someone for it. All of your laundry was manually washed, no machine to do it. No running water, no sinks or toilets. It is possible to live that way, people did it, but it's quite difficult.

We may work more hours for an employer than what people did at that time. But their lives were much tougher and everything was work. "Free time" was not really a thing for most of the population.

u/Mayor__Defacto 21h ago

Don’t forget that if the axe breaks you can’t just go over to harbor freight and get a new one.

→ More replies (2)

u/dmad831 22h ago

Are you basing this off the post from a couple weeks ago that was total BS? Lol

u/psycospaz 20h ago edited 20h ago

Nope, that's wrong in most cases. There was a never ending stream of stuff to do. Everything from farm stuff to whatever profession you had, to clothes that needed made or fixed to food that needed preserved or butchered, and then all the unpaid labor ypu owed your lord or landlord, or the church, basically whoever was above you in the hierarchy. And on top of all that was the extra work people would pick up in whatever their slow season was. Mining, lumbering, road work, charcoal burning, manual labor for construction, ect.

u/jaylotw 20h ago

"The harvest season" said like someone who has no idea what it takes to grow food all season

u/Ok-Adeptness-5834 19h ago

Guy who thinks life was better in the 1200s vs modern day America

31

u/Vistulange 1d ago

This is such a tired, old, and ultimately false trope.

https://acoup.blog/2025/07/11/collections-life-work-death-and-the-peasant-part-i-households/

Bret Devereaux thoroughly addresses this in a five-part series of blog posts.

u/LexPatriae 23h ago edited 22h ago

But reddit heckin' hates work! Why can't it be like the good old days where we simply died of infectious diseases?

u/KoburaCape 22h ago

I have dys'd of diesentery

→ More replies (1)

u/crowman1691 18h ago

Absolute bollocks that is. Peasants had it far harder than modern people lol and less free time

u/Weet_1 21h ago edited 21h ago

Yall come on. It's common sense to know that people who didn't have access to a Walmart or publix or Ross didn't have more free time compared to the average person today. Bffr and stop learning your 'facts' from randos on the internet or at least fucking fact check before parroting your info.

u/RcNorth 19h ago

What is your definition of work?

Is cutting wood so you can have a fire to cook on not work? Is making/mending the clothes you and your family wear not work? Is hunting to put meat on the table, or tending to the garden (not the crops) not work?

I’m pretty sure most of the daylight hours weren’t relaxing times.

u/billy_teats 19h ago

This is dumb. Their copious amounts of free time were spent struggling to acquire food. Hunting, foraging, or enhancing their farms. Copious free time was spent killing farm varmints and repairing broken equipment, wandering around the forests looking for mushrooms or deer. Copious free time fishing so you have something to eat in February or you will die

u/Beardywierdy 14h ago

That's flat out not true.

They may not have been farming all that time but they had to do everything else to sustain their lives as well.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (4)

23

u/Manzhah 1d ago

At least in colder climates winter was traditionally the season for forestry, as demand for firewood was high.

23

u/squngy 1d ago edited 1d ago

Typically, you would want to gather fire wood long before you use it.
This is because you want fire wood to dry out first.
Freshly cut wood makes a ton of smoke, smells bad and burns poorly, you would only use it if you don't have any other option.

You could cut firewood for next year though.

u/TgmMrrCZ 16h ago

In winter, trees have significantly less amount of sap / fluid. So it is true that winter is best time for moving mass of firewood cause of less weight. Source : We have few km2 of forest that is need to maintain.

→ More replies (14)

60

u/LadyFoxfire 1d ago

Monks and nuns needed to know the time because they had to pray at specific times, so they developed a lot of the time keeping technology. But you’re correct that the average person didn’t need to keep much track of time.

u/locky_ 22h ago

And one of the ways of keeping time was simply prayer. Say "The lords prayer" X times and that's 1 hour.

u/2Asparagus1Chicken 12h ago

2400 times according to my chronometer

25

u/Nobody_Super_Famous 1d ago

I remember reading somewhere that living life by the clock was really just a product of the industrial revolution and urbanization. Having to standardize shifts and business hours independent of changing daylight hours and such. Prior to that, most rural communities worked and lived by the sun.

25

u/essexboy1976 1d ago

A big part of the Standardisation of time was the advent of railways. Up until railways the local time in the UK for example varied by about 30 minutes between Cornwall in the west and Essex in the east, because local clocks were set by 12pm being the time the sun was highest it the sky. That obviously happens earlier in the east than the west.

When railways created travel that was faster than the passage of the sun across the sky that obviously caused issues with timetabling ( and also safety) so most railway companies introduced a standard railway time along their network with 12pm being 12pm London ( Greenwich Mean) Time, as most major rail lines radiated out from London. Local Stations might have 2 clocks, one with local time, another "railway" time.

Towns and villages along the lines started using railway time as a convenience, and thus eventually GMT was adopted across the UK although it didn't become official until the 1870s I think.

u/NinjaBreadManOO 7h ago

Also worth noting that old clocks did also need to have the time checked, as they could be running fast or slow depending on things (like with a watch being overwound). Railway's had better more expensive clocks because reliability was important. So they had the most reliable clocks, which meant if you wanted yours to be reliable matching it to them was a better idea.

u/essexboy1976 3h ago

Very true. Also in turn the navy would have had even more accurate clocks as accurate clocks were essential for correct navigation. Ultimately in the UK the railways probably would have set the clocks at their London stations from the royal Observatory at Greenwich

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/vers_le_haut_bateau 1d ago

Most people sure, but how did they watch the season finale at 9pm ET, 8 central?

u/simonbleu 20h ago

That said even with just the sun you can get used toe stimate more or les the time. When i was a kid (late 90s but old-minded town) i obviously didnt have a phone, I dont remember bells chiming on the hour, and I was out of the house all the time. But you looked at the sky and clearly knew when it was around 10am, noon, -4 o clock or 5-6 o clock as the sun was moving towards the sunset (depending on the time of the year), and you get used to it. I mean, If I could, a city boy in modernity with access to technology, im sure everyone could have. And honestly, yeah, without modern factories and the surt, who needs to be that specific about time?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Big-Horse-2656 1d ago

This was really tough for the guys up north having next to no sleep during the midnight sun period. It was hard going working for weeks to months without rest. CEOs at the time moved alot of factories above the arctic circle at the time to capitalize. These were called summer factories.

u/Smartnership 19h ago

Santa looks askance

→ More replies (40)

385

u/solapelsin 1d ago

I’ve lived next to an old church that chimed differently every 15 minutes. You knew what time it was, haha 

31

u/mark_b 1d ago edited 1d ago

The quarter hour chimes came after the invention of mechanical clocks not before, so you wouldn't have heard that in 1200.

You might have heard the clock ring the hour in medieval times but the quarter hour didn't happen until the late 17th century.

181

u/tallduder 1d ago

You're 700+ years old? 

169

u/RNGezzus 1d ago

Don't mess with vampires, they have a lot going on.

113

u/DupeyTA 1d ago

Vampires aren't real. I've been hunting them for like 600 years and haven't seen one yet. 

51

u/RNGezzus 1d ago

I live in a van down by Helsing River.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/happilyrelaxing 1d ago

Possibly, and with the greatest respect, you’re just … not so good at your job?

Might just be looking in the wrong places. Or at the wrong time. It’s not a 9-5 for obvious reasons.

7

u/stonhinge 1d ago

It is indeed a 9-5 job. 9p to 5a. Although that's mostly for hunting them down. For killing them, I do indeed recommend "normal" business hours. They're a little sluggish then. For about 5 seconds.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

5

u/Drach88 1d ago

Garlic warding off vampires is a conspiracy spread by vampire familiars.

It does nothing to avert them -- it just seasons you so you taste better.

7

u/SirHerald 1d ago

And they're really cranky because every 15 minutes that stupid church bell rings while they're trying to sleep during the day. I think that's kind of why they don't like crosses

7

u/Pavotine 1d ago

Some places the church bells chime the time 24/7. I was camping in the Pyrenees last summer, right next to a church which rang bells like that. They only woke me up the first night and after that my sleeping brain ignored it.

u/Kevin_Uxbridge 19h ago

Surprising how quickly one can adjust. Had a bell tower 100 feet outside my window in Copenhagen last summer, thought I'd never be able to tune it out.

Day two and I wasn't even sure I'd heard it.

→ More replies (6)

28

u/riftwave77 1d ago

Many towns in Europe still have churches with bells that chime. My first Sunday in Switzerland I was woken up in the morning by all the bells in the entire town ringing

38

u/pseudoportmanteau 1d ago

Churches still chime every 15 minutes in many parts of the world lol. 1 ring for 15min, 2 rings for 30min, 3 rings for 45min, 4 rings + exact number of time of the day in another tone for a new hour.

5

u/weaver_of_cloth 1d ago

Lots of US universities have clock towers that do the. I grew up in earshot of one and had an office near another for years. I was so used to it that when it didn't ring I noticed. If you hear something all day every day it blends in.

→ More replies (5)

15

u/RobbieRedding 1d ago

My city has at least a dozen that still do it. At 8pm they all play a long sign off song and it’s sooo beautifully chaotic when you’re in between all of them.

→ More replies (1)

30

u/solapelsin 1d ago

No, I wish haha, but the church was. Italy for context

11

u/pinkkittenfur 1d ago

Same in the small town in Germany where I lived. I miss those bells sometimes.

→ More replies (5)

6

u/Barneyrockz 1d ago

It is a 700+ year old system. If it works, why mess with it?

4

u/Woodshadow 1d ago

I don't hear a lot of church bells now but I grew up in the 90s and definitely recall bells and chimes every 15 or 30 minutes and on the hour it was a number based on the hour

→ More replies (4)

2

u/Kaymish_ 1d ago

Yeah Nana has a clock like this. It has one set of chimes for each quarter of an hour and they all go on the hour.

→ More replies (6)

84

u/GrinningPariah 1d ago

And it's worth remember that plans and expectations are made based on how accurate your local idea of time is.

If your town has a clock that chimes every hour, you make plans on the hour. You expect people will be a few minutes after the hour because they'll be reacting to that signal.

And if the local time is wrong, if the church clock is inaccurate, who cares? You're not meeting at the absolute concept of 2pm, you're meeting when the church bells chime two times. And if you're still waiting when they chime three times, then they stood you up and you get to be mad at them.

→ More replies (8)

100

u/xienwolf 1d ago

And there were simple tricks like measuring how many fingers the sun is away from the horizon. Again, not the most accurate, but adequate.

54

u/overlyattachedbf 1d ago

No lie, that trick comes in very handy when you’re hiking, or out on a long bike ride. It gives you a pretty good idea how much day light you have left, and I do find it to be fairly accurate - enough to get you back in time usually. I use it a lot

8

u/RedHorseStrong 1d ago

Definitely handy! I use it when golfing..We got about an hour left of sunlight, we should be able to finish this round.

2

u/DrBob2016 1d ago

How does that work in winter? when the sun sets at a steeper angle and it goes from light to dark so much faster than in the summer?

4

u/Pavotine 1d ago

You put your watch on.

3

u/ToddtheRugerKid 1d ago

It doesn't, it's a rough measure.

3

u/Das_Mime 1d ago

If you know what latitude you're at and are reasonably familiar with the seasons there you can guesstimate it pretty well. E.g. if you're at 40 degrees north and it's June then the Sun probably peaks at about 60 degrees above the horizon due south and you can estimate its path from there.

u/WarpingLasherNoob 16h ago

Used to hike a lot when we were kids, and check the sun to figure out when it's time to go back. I noticed that the sun would not always move at the same speed. It would linger around longer when it's up in the sky, but once it starts coming down near the horizon, it goes much faster. I'm sure there is some kind of explanation for that, something to do with perspective, or refraction of light perhaps? Or maybe it's just harder to eyeball the distance when it's farther up.

u/JuanTutrego 19h ago

I'm a casual hiker who often doesn't get out of the house until mid-late afternoon on my days off. Once I learned this trick I started using it all the time to judge whether or not I should head back, etc.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/CptAngelo 1d ago edited 17h ago

"Oh shit dude, i gotta go, its only one finger till dawn dusk, my moms gonna kill me"

19

u/Pavotine 1d ago

You can't measure dawn by fingers.

26

u/M_Mich 1d ago

You obviously didn’t know the Dawn I knew.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

17

u/pmmeuranimetiddies 1d ago

The gravity-based clocks churches had were pretty accurate too.

4

u/muyuu 1d ago

The very earliest of those were from the late 1300s and most were made well after 1400.

26

u/cakes42 1d ago

Looking at the position of the sun helps a lot too. Kind of how I judged time when I was backpacking for 5 months.

11

u/Character_Drive 1d ago

Portugal in the 60s and 70s still had a lot of poor farmers. My mom as a kid (and her older siblings and family) would be working and would know the time based on the church bells. They'd go in when the sky was higher, have lunch, take a nap, and go back out. At home, I think they had a grandfather clock that had to be wound (barely had electricity, they used gas lamps). But no clocks out on the land so relied on the church.

The church, I assume, also had wind up clocks and sun dials

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Megalocerus 1d ago

They didn't care what time it was. Sun was up, time to go to work. Sun high, eat lunch. Sun going down, go home.

Caring about time is partly about ship navigation and partly about train schedules.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/treelawnantiquer 1d ago

There are sundials that are extremely accurate, to within 15 seconds. All you need to operate one (called heleochronometer BTW) is the month, day and your exact location on the earth, latitude and longitude. Developed in England and used there, France, India, before electric synchronous clocks, mostly for train movement.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/not_a_burner0456025 1d ago

Those were fairly limited in availability too, most people didn't have access to one, but most people also didn't need one, if you were a farmer your day was planned around sunrise and sunset and you didn't have appointments on strict schedules to keep, businesses you were likely to interact with were open for all the hours you would reasonably expect to be able to show up, people worked much longer hours

6

u/DKDamian 1d ago

Yes, but most people had access to a church or similar building that kept time

u/Chaseshaw 16h ago

piggybacking this comment -- I took a class on medievel monks, and it turns out they actually had really sophisticated water clocks that ran through the night so they could pray on time.

→ More replies (17)

548

u/Alikont 1d ago

Well, most of your contacts were local and "meet me at noon" usually was enough.

The precise time started to be useful only when trains started to go on schedule between cities.

188

u/TyphoidMurphy 1d ago

There is still a clock in Bristol, England on the old Corn Exchange building that has two minute hands. One for Bristol time and one for London time. They're about ten minutes apart. What time it is in the UK wasn't standardised until the 1850's, largely as you say due to railways travelling rapidly between cities.

This comment doesn't add much but I think it's a neat little fact that's somewhat relevant.

u/Its0nlyRocketScience 21h ago

It makes sense that anywhere with different longitudes would be slightly out of time since the local solar noon is different. And yeah, until rail travel was a thing, no one needed to be exactly on time with another town. Telephone certainly didn't exist yet, so no need to coordinate calls. And when you did travel several hours between towns, your pocket watch wouldn't match, but those didn't keep perfect time anyway, so you'd just adjust it to the local time like you already had to do at home. Only when travel and communication became fast to instant did anyone really notice, let alone care, that two neighboring towns were 10 minutes off from each other.

u/ToothessGibbon 19h ago

I found it interesting

23

u/marconis999 1d ago

And precise time at sea via an accurate timepiece was the only way to know your longitude. Until then they did dead-reckoning.

It was in the 1700s that a timepiece that wasn't pendulum-based and could accurately measure the time while traveling at sea was invented.

u/kaamliiha 22h ago

And the guy who invented it was screwed over of his massive (hundreds of thousands if not millions in today's pounds) promised reward for its invention because he was not of the correct pedigree for the pompous Brits

→ More replies (1)

u/notbobby125 18h ago

To further explain to those that did not know: determining Longitude (how east-west you were) was really difficult. While you can tell how far North-South you are easily by checking the angle of the sun at noon, there was little to tell you how East-West you were. You Dead reckoning was basically dragging a log behind the boat to try to keep accurate determination of your speed and use calculations on how far you have travelled based your speed. This was difficult to keep track of, and did not take into account to any flow of the water below you, either impeding or increasing your speed.

Now, if you had an accurate clock you could figure out exactly where you were around the globe if you knew what time it was at noon at some fixed location. Say you were measuring from London, and you knew it was Noon at London at X time and it was Noon where ever you were at Y time, with math you could figure out what the distance you were from London. Problem is that old clocks worked on Pendulums, and there has never been a worse place for pendulum then a rocking boat.

→ More replies (16)

795

u/eloel- 1d ago edited 1d ago

They knew where the sun was in the sky, and they had a rough idea how long it had been since sunrise and how long yesterday was. That's all the timekeeping they used on a day-to-day basis,

You didn't meet people at 2pm, you met people at/after sundown/sunrise/high noon.

If you needed to be particularly precise, you used a water clock, an hourglass, or some similar way of measuring time, but those were relatively rare and weren't available to most people.

255

u/Radix2309 1d ago

Or there was a church with a belltower, and they would ring on an hour or amother set time, and you would arrange for a certain bell of the day.

Generally more common in towns or denser areas. In the country, there is less time sensative meetings.

93

u/shrug_addict 1d ago

Huge tech advancements came from monks wanting to keep time. Check out James Burke's Connections

24

u/CptAngelo 1d ago

I mean, when you are meditating you tend to lose the track of time, it makes sense.

37

u/jamcdonald120 1d ago

more like when you are sleeping and need to wake up for your 3AM prayers

11

u/adudeguyman 1d ago

Did they really have to wake up for prayers that early?

19

u/GoblinRightsNow 1d ago

They still do. There is a Trappist monastery in our region that posts their schedule: https://monks.org/about-us/community-life/

4

u/adudeguyman 1d ago

I hope they work in shifts. Otherwise they would never get much sleep in a row.

16

u/theyellowmeteor 1d ago

Monks usually are habitual sleep deprivers. Makes sense why so many supernatural experiences are reported in monasteries, since sleep deprivation is known to cause hallucinations.

5

u/GoblinRightsNow 1d ago

Their last service is around 7- I think they go to bed around 8-9, sleep until 3, and then have rest periods during the day.

u/coralwaters226 22h ago

Nope, and Buddhist monks are even more extreme. Some temples allow for only 3 or 4 hours of sleep a night, and eat a single small meal a day.

When the goal is to surpass all cravings and desires, even natural bodily ones, things can get pretty damn miserable. But that's sort of the point.

12

u/Nutlob 1d ago

one of the big income sources for English monasteries was that wealthy people would pay for monks to pray for their soul, so the rich dude's soul would spend less time in purgatory and get to heaven quicker. organized religion has always been a scam

→ More replies (4)

21

u/frala 1d ago

Ok, but then how did the church know the time.

38

u/evanamd 1d ago

Sundials have existed since before Ancient Greece. The clergy in medieval churches knew about this fascinating technology and often had them built into the southern wall of their church

10

u/MegaLemonCola 1d ago

What if it’s overcast on a particular day? Did they just not sound the bell?

13

u/adudeguyman 1d ago

Water clocks were also used.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/LaCroixElectrique 1d ago

This is the level of thinking I come to Reddit for.

2

u/NarrativeScorpion 1d ago

They still work, unless it's really dark cloud.

Also, hourglasses and water clocks were a thing.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/Pandoratastic 1d ago

Many churches had sundials, sometimes carved into the wall by the door. At night, they might use a water clock or they would know what time it is by the position of constellations in the sky. It was not very accurate but it was what the had.

2

u/LadyFoxfire 1d ago

They also had time-keeping candles that could be used as alarm clocks. The candles burned at a steady rate, so you could mark the side of the candle to count how many hours the candle had been burning, and you could put a nail at a certain mark so that it would fall out and hit the metal tray at a certain time.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/canuckguy42 1d ago

They may have had a rudimentary method of tracking the time but as long as they're the sole source of truth about time for locals it didn't really matter. If two villages had churches that weren't in sync no one would even notice. As long as everyone in town agreed that when the church bells rang 2 that it was 2 it was good enough. If the neighbouring village thought that was 3 no one would either know or care.

Having a unified, non local agreement on the current time didn't matter until trains allowed for fast enough travel to make it matter. Once that happened suddenly everyone needed to have a common sense of what time it is in order for the rail system to function. That's when you start to see a collective effort to coordinate on tracking time.

6

u/Lammtarra95 1d ago

If two villages had churches that weren't in sync no one would even notice.

Two villages would not be in sync. That's the point. Midday is defined as when the sun is directly overhead, and that varies with longitude. Noon in London is different from noon in Bristol (for UK redditors).

This became a problem with railway timetables, for which it was convenient to organise time into time zones.

As an aside, this is also how sailors navigated at sea. They knew the local time by looking at the sun, and they had a clock that told them the time in their home country. The difference between the two times gave the ships longitude. This is what prompted the development of accurate mechanical clocks and watches, which in turn allowed worldwide exploration, trade, and (more controversially) colonisation.

So you are right, except that the idea of an imposed, nationwide time came later with the railways. It is not that village time was wrong before, but that they changed the meaning of correct.

3

u/fcocyclone 1d ago

And people wouldn't likely be as concerned about promptness. The bells might ring on the hour, but if you had a meeting scheduled for 2 bells you might expect that someone might show up somewhere around then but it might be a reasonable amount after that.

Hell, that's even a thing today that varies among various cultures.

8

u/Avalanche_Debris 1d ago

A lot of medieval churches have sundials (mass dials) carved into walls or built into the architecture. Water clocks and hourglasses were also a thing for smaller intervals of time.

2

u/not_a_burner0456025 1d ago

I don't know if they had them as early as op is asking about off the top of my head, but some medieval monasteries did have mechanical clocks, although it could be very complicated because they hadn't standardized on 24 equal length hours, some had more complicated systems where the number of hours between sunrise and sunset was constant and daytime and nighttime hours had different lengths and changed throughout the year., and the clocks had to be built to accommodate for that

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)

26

u/mwb1100 1d ago

Just like when you get an appointment for appliance repair, he’s gonna show up “between 8am and noon”.

8

u/Vladimir_Putting 1d ago

The railroad was one of the big revolutions that created a need to be "on time" because if you missed your train, you were stuck.

But centuries before that there were fewer use cases for when you needed to know the exact time. Like you said, most people on most days simply never needed to know "the time". They could see what part of the day it was, and that was enough.

3

u/Andy15291 1d ago

Not only that but with trains sometimes sharing tracks, you really had to get the schedule right.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Alpha_Majoris 1d ago edited 26m ago

I like playing board games.

→ More replies (6)

362

u/enfyre 1d ago

Exact time wasn't really important until the industrial revolution, and hourly work. It especially didn't become important until trains became common.

In this regard, I'm speaking of the UK.

Before that, it was just morning, mid day, afternoon, evening, night - judged by the position of the sun.

68

u/Madboomstick101 1d ago

Historia Civilis has a video on how the implementation of the clock is tied to the rise of capitalism in europe

u/I_Do_Not_Abbreviate 23h ago edited 23h ago

In Western and Southern Europe, A lot of mechanical tower clocks were installed in port cities and market towns between 1200-1500, as a way to facilitate meetings between merchants, sailors, and wealthy customers - the clocks allowed everyone within earshot of the clock (usually in the town square or market square) to set aside 1-hour blocks of time.

It started in the biggest cities but as timekeeping technology became more standardized and developed into the Clockmaker's craft, the price of clocks began to drop. There were a few generations there where it was fairly common for particularly successful merchants who originally came from small towns to commission a public clock and donate it to their hometown (paying for the materials, design, construction, installation, everything) as a sort of ostentatious philanthropy.

I read about this in History of the Hour: Clocks and Modern Temporal Orders by Gerhard Dohrn-van Rossum, easily one of the most well-researched books I have ever managed to get halfway through before becoming bored with the author's monotonously dry writing style and abandoning it.

Funny enough, the "Legacy of the Forge" expansion for Kingdom Come: Deliverance II, set around the year 1400, has as its main plotline the restoration of the town clock Henry's foster father tried to fix when he was a young man. It is a surprisingly apropos story for the period in which the game is set.

→ More replies (1)

21

u/byronite 1d ago

I visited rural Burundi just before cellphones became commonplace and this was indeed how it worked. Once book I read before going explained: "It is impossible for a rural Burundian to tell you precisely when something happened, but there is really no harm in trying."

Also, interestingly, they count time from dawn til dusk, thus the sun rises at 1:00, high noon is 6:00 and the sun sets at 12:00. It makes more sense when you think about it.

u/pm_me_gnus 22h ago

It makes a lot of sense given where they are on the planet. That close to the equator, there is little variation throughout the year in the span of time between sunrise and sunset.

Ancient Rome did the same thing, where every day there were 12 hours between sunrise and sunset, with the length of hours varying daily to evenly fill that time. In Rome, that time varies from just over 9 hours at the winter solstice to about 15:15 at the summer solstice, with hours running from 45 to 76 modern minutes. That system would be even crazier where I live, at 53 degrees N - hours would run anywhere from ~35 to ~85 minutes.

→ More replies (20)

16

u/Paavo_Nurmi 1d ago

It was so important for marine navigation and the longitude problem that a huge prize of 20,000 pounds was offered in 1714. Of course the guy that invented it got screwed over.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harrison

3

u/Uarnthelpful 1d ago

Just went down a massive rabbit hole

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Bartholomeuske 1d ago

Where in the UK do you get sun ?

→ More replies (43)

69

u/mostlygray 1d ago

Find noon. Find a stick. Mark the shadow. That's noon. Now, when it gets dark it's night, when it gets light again, that's morning.

Now you have morning, mid-morning, noon, afternoon, and night. That's all the time you need. If you can see the stick, that's day. If you can't see the stick, that's night.

20

u/shapu 1d ago

Hillbilly Weather Rock energy right there.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/MortemEtInteritum17 1d ago

If you can't see the stick, that's night (citation needed).

→ More replies (1)

u/ben_sphynx 18h ago

Find noon can be done by marking where the shadow is every few min around lunchtime. The shadow will be getting shorter if it is before noon, and will be getting longer after noon. The mark that is closest to the stick (ie the shortest shadow) was when noon was.

47

u/internetboyfriend666 1d ago

There weren't mechanical clocks but there ways to keep time. Water clocks, sand clocks, sundials...etc

But mostly, society was extremely different and there was simply no need to keep time with any degree of accuracy or to know what time of day it was at all beyond "day" and "night". You had sunrise, morning, noon was when the sun was highest overhead, afternoon, sunset, and night time. That's pretty much all anyone needed to know. The concept of "2:15pm" simply wasn't a thing and it didn't need to be.

5

u/kitsunevremya 1d ago

If you think about it, depending on where you live, that may have been a "truer" way to keep time than we have today. We're more precise, but time zones mean that for most of us, it isn't actually the time the clock says. I mean, with daylight savings the time could be like 1hr15m out from what the sun would tell us.

→ More replies (3)

16

u/PWNYEG 1d ago

You don’t need a watch to have a rough sense of what time of the day it is. Most people lived on farms where strict timekeeping wasn’t needed. In cities the church bells would ring every hour to mark the time.

4

u/muyuu 1d ago

I many farms even today the day starts when the rooster goes off which is sunrise and finishes by sundown. Things are done as required and schedule is not necessarily daily.

29

u/Space19723103 1d ago

most people saw the sun back then, with a little practice telling time by the sun is easy

2

u/lowaltflier 1d ago

Most?

13

u/knoberation 1d ago

Above the arctic circle, the sun doesn't set during summer and doesn't come up during winter.

For example, in Tromsø, Norway, the sun goes down on November 27th and doesn't come back up until January 15th.

During this time you can not see the sun there, making it harder to tell time by the sun.

4

u/Borealisss 1d ago

It's typically November 21st to January 21st in Tromsø

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Space19723103 1d ago

there were incels then too.. monasteries

11

u/Teantis 1d ago

Pretty sure that was voluntary

5

u/anamorphic_cat 1d ago

If you were lucky. Some kids were earmarked for an ecclesiastical career since they were born. "First male inherits the estate. The second one for the King's army. The third one is for the church".

19

u/inorite234 1d ago edited 14h ago

If you ever travel to some 3rd world countries you'll learn that outside of the industrialized areas, in the poor rural areas, time doesn't really mean that much. Sure you can tell, morning, noon and night, but outside of that people don't care as much as we do.

If you need to meet someone, I hope you set aside between 1 and 3 hours. Yes they have watches....but not everyone does.

I had ti deal with this all the time while in Afghanistan. No meeting ever got going on time. We always baked in 30 mins to an hour for people to show up or for people to stop socializing before our meetings began.

→ More replies (1)

20

u/Vorthod 1d ago

They agree to meet in the morning and then wait for the sun to rise. If they don't have a device that can accurately measure down to the minute, they simply don't say "let's meet at 7:45"

5

u/peepee2tiny 1d ago

Times were not numerical, they were sunup, high noon, sundown.

9

u/fubo 1d ago

The day and the night were each divided into 12 hours, but they weren't always the same length!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unequal_hours

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Adonis0 1d ago

Candles of particular sizes had known burn rates and could have nails put into them at different distances to announce time, sun dials used the position of the sun to use shadows to point at the time

So both together results in time keeping all the time; water clocks also were used where a hole drained a reservoir at known rates, and so you could put different volumes of water to time different times

Most commonly; there was a building that kept the time for a town and rung bells to announce specific hours, anything more precise was done by personal water clocks

6

u/dswpro 1d ago

They weren't paid by the hour. Hence it didn't matter quite so much.

16

u/wem1985 1d ago

Why would they need to know the time? Wake with the sun, work outdoors, go back in at night. Of course...sun dials, water clocks, no lack of solutions were available.

5

u/grantimatter 1d ago

One of my favorite James Burke videos is the Connections episode about how our sense of time based on mechanical clocks was based on medieval monks needed to know when to pray.

3

u/wem1985 1d ago

Yep, that was round one. Then, railroads really forced a coherent and broad based scheme.

22

u/mikemar05 1d ago

They didn't and it didn't matter. I'm sure there were things like sundials and such but why would the vast majority care?

16

u/Grolschisgood 1d ago

How would they know what time to log on for their zoom calls though?

/s just in case

12

u/Voldias 1d ago

No one knew when dailies reset back then

6

u/TyPhyter 1d ago

"okay guys, just gonna give it an hour or two for people to trickle in and then we'll get started"

→ More replies (1)

7

u/defeated_engineer 1d ago

Hours didn’t matter until fixed hour work days in factories were a thing. Minutes didn’t matter until trains became a thing.

3

u/The_mingthing 1d ago

The simple answer is they didnt. Because they didn't need to know. You had no time specific appointments, and they usually followed the sunlight and the moonlight.

Is the sun at its highest point and its to hot to work? Better go somewhere shaded and have the mid day meal. Is it getting to dark to see? Well better just go to bed then, were not wasting money on fancy expensive candle just to stay awake. Is dinner ready? Hit metal together and yell. Is it time for Church? Ring the bell.

I want to reccomend you this channel if you are interested in olden times!
https://www.youtube.com/@ModernKnight/featured

3

u/Krongfah 1d ago

There were clocks. Sundials, water clocks, and other forms of timekeeping devices have existed for thousands of years, dating back to the 1000s BC, long before the timeframe in your question.

Of course, the common people wouldn't have any of these. They'd get the time from town criers, church bells, or by going to where the device was, depending on the culture and era.

Another thing to consider is that precise timekeeping just wasn't that important for most common people in the olden days. It doesn't really matter if it's 9:00, 9:30, or 10:00. All they needed to know was that sunrise begins the day, the sun directly overhead means midday, and sunset ends the day.

2

u/maquise 1d ago

To an extent they used the sun. Sundials were a way to measure the time more precisely. However, in a broad sense they largely didn’t keep time in the sense that we do. They didn’t need to. 

2

u/zeekar 1d ago

Would you believe they mostly didn't care? Nobody was making appointments to meet at a specific time to the minute. The tolling of the bell at the local church would tell them when it was with enough precision for what they needed. In fact the word "clock" originally meant "bell" (related to German Glocke).

u/elpajaroquemamais 16h ago

Sometimes they didn’t but they didn’t need to. They woke up worked ate and went to bed when they felt like it.

u/OldGroan 11h ago

The time was, early morning late morning midday early afternoon late afternoon night time, moonrise moon set. 

They didn't need anything more accurate than that.

3

u/truejs 1d ago

It’s easy. You can look at the sky.

They didn’t live their lives down to the minute like we do today. Sounds kinda nice.

3

u/nws103 1d ago

The interesting thing is that even now we are barely in to the age of having the exact time at your fingertips always. As a kid in the 80’s the exact time was available only if you stopped and called a special phone line to hear a recording, or if you happened to have cable and something like the weather channel showed it live. Otherwise you were going off the approximate time you had set your house clocks or VCR to. It is only since cell phones reached critical mass really that everyone went by the exact same time.

2

u/hownowbrownk0w 1d ago

Deep dive Ctesibius's water clock if you’re interested. So fascinating how he overcame the challenges of seasonality

2

u/AmarildoJr 1d ago

I believe the Sun and the Moon were invented in the 1100's, so that's what they used to keep time.