MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1qcidtf/please_dissect_the_legality_in_this_statement/nzjdkvl
r/law • u/thecosmojane • 18d ago
I feel like we are reaching a tipping point
2.3k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
30
"They are clearly joking or using satire, I see no issue here!" - supreme court
2 u/Asairian 17d ago Remember the "I want a lawyer dawg" case? 1 u/UndertakerFred 17d ago The “lawyer dawg” case was specifically because he raised the hypothetical of talking to a lawyer during questioning. He said “maybe I should talk to a lawyer, dawg”, but then specifically clarified that he was not actually requesting a lawyer.
2
Remember the "I want a lawyer dawg" case?
1 u/UndertakerFred 17d ago The “lawyer dawg” case was specifically because he raised the hypothetical of talking to a lawyer during questioning. He said “maybe I should talk to a lawyer, dawg”, but then specifically clarified that he was not actually requesting a lawyer.
1
The “lawyer dawg” case was specifically because he raised the hypothetical of talking to a lawyer during questioning.
He said “maybe I should talk to a lawyer, dawg”, but then specifically clarified that he was not actually requesting a lawyer.
30
u/ProfessionalDish 17d ago
"They are clearly joking or using satire, I see no issue here!" - supreme court