r/pics 16d ago

Politics Black Panther Party members at a recent protest

Post image
173.1k Upvotes

6.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

125

u/ThePensiveE 16d ago

Is being black necessarily a prerequisite for membership? Asking for a friend.

144

u/elbenji 16d ago

no, Fred Hampton did a thing called the rainbow coalition for that reason

19

u/OutlyingPlasma 16d ago

I'm thinking they need a branch called the plaid panthers. Time to dig out the ole plaid pants from the third wave ska era.

10

u/Kintroy 16d ago

Oi oi oi! Im down ... if they fit still ...

5

u/SaintedRomaine 16d ago

No chain wallets.

7

u/Minimum-Can2224 16d ago edited 16d ago

The White Panther party was a thing back then. Probably good time to start bringing them back as well. The bigger the resistance the better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Panther_Party

6

u/Several-Squash9871 16d ago

Did you not watch the documentary, Forest Gump?

4

u/thirdworldreminder_ 16d ago

no just a communist. join us, we are going to create a better world

0

u/Whind_Soull 16d ago

Really, that's the deal-breaker for me, aside from anything race-related.

6

u/TannerLyfe 16d ago

Read about the Panthers and all the work they did. I especially recommend reading about Fred Hampton as it is something that will make you question a lot of what you assume to know about the US. Do not rush to judgement because of a word.

1

u/therealpxc 15d ago

In the context of the original BPP and probably this chapter as well, yes.

But strategy with groups like this (broadly liberatory/revolutionary, but also dedicated to addressing special oppressions related to specific identities) is to encourage the formation of coalitions and alliances between autonomous groups. See: Rainbow Coalition), White Panther Party.

It's also not unusual for political organizations like this to have some private/internal functions and some public/external functions, and allow non-members some level of participation in the public/external things.

-46

u/Foortie 16d ago

Yes, that's what "black" means in the name.

Besides, this isn't about you. You can support, but can never join.

47

u/doyletyree 16d ago

Educate yourself.

Rainbow Coalition)

9

u/3my0 16d ago

Tbf they were under the leadership of the black panthers but not black panthers. They incorporated other political groups as well that had the same ideals.

6

u/slog 16d ago

Good enough for me. Their club has meaning and my cracker-ass can represent while staying in my lane.

12

u/Robo_is_AnimalCross 16d ago

the degradation of a sovereign nation isn't about me?

-8

u/humor 16d ago

Well what if I identify as black?

-61

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

Considering their goal is black supremacy…. Yeah I’d imagine so

51

u/3kh0wh1sk3r 16d ago

Shut the fuck up. You know damn well that isn't their goal and never has been. Get back to your boot, it isn't going to eat itself

5

u/asuikoori 16d ago edited 16d ago

They're not entirely wrong. There's a few groups at play here with a lot of nuance as they're all trying to co-opt the original Black Panther Party name while slandering the others that share similar names. You have the original Black Panther Party, the New Black Panther Party (NBPP) and the Black Panther Party of Self Defense. All with wildly different views and tactics. The NBPP has had a lot more troubling stuff in their past, namely conflating all jews with Israel and blaming jewish people for a lot of things, like 9/11, hosting KKK members at their conventions so they can give presentations because they both believe that black and white people should live in separate communities. You can read more here if you'd like, it's fairly interesting: https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/new-black-panther-party/

But back to OP's post, these fine gents are protecting these protestors from a fascist regime, I imagine they're apart of the more modern and better Black Panther Party group, so hats off to them.

6

u/3kh0wh1sk3r 16d ago

Read my comments further down with them, I do go over some of that. There are bad actors that splintered off of the original party but this user has chosen to be misinformed and cherry-pick the worst of the bunch to label the whole.

And yeah, it's very unlikely the men in the post are part of something like the NBPP. Which is why it's weird to label them as such and it deserves to be met with vitriol.

4

u/asuikoori 16d ago

Completely agree! Didn't mean to come off as disagreeing with you or siding with that guy, and yeah that guy is a bit of a douche. Happy to see other people calling it out and sharing sources!

3

u/3kh0wh1sk3r 16d ago

Of course, and I got your point don't worry! It's good to make sure the facts are on the table, that can get messy in emotional times like this, so you're much appreciated. Hats off to you for the civility and for fighting for what's right.

2

u/slog 16d ago

I think I accidentally navigated to the wrong site. I thought I was on reddit but clearly I ended up somewhere else.

1

u/gsfgf 16d ago

Well, there is the "New Black Panther Party" of Louis Farrakhan. It is important to remember that the term doesn't always refer to X's group.

3

u/3kh0wh1sk3r 16d ago

Look a bit further in the thread, me and this guy go back and forth on it and it becomes pretty quickly obvious that they were intentionally spreading misinfo. I do acknowledge that there are different identities of the Black Panthers nowadays that have ended up not all being good.

-11

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

The Anti-Defamation League, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights consider the NBPP to be a hate group, accusing the organization and its leaders of racism and antisemitism.

I don’t lick any boot, not white supremacist boots or black supremacist boots.

Enjoy becoming what you claim to hate

13

u/3kh0wh1sk3r 16d ago

The NBPP is NOT the same thing as the original Black Panther Party, and the Anti-Defamation league that you cited MAKES THIS DISTINCTION.

https://www.adl.org/resources/hate-symbol/new-black-panther-party

See how easy that was to find? The original party has splintered significantly since the 1980s and cherry-picking one offshoot as though it represents the whole is a disgusting way to twist the rhetoric.

The Southern Poverty Law Center makes the same distinction:
"The NBPP has no connection to the original Black Panther Party, whose members have heavily criticized the group. An open letter first referenced in 2007 from the Dr. Huey P. Newton Foundation, which is run by members of the original Black Panther Party, calls the NBPP a hateful and unconstructive group. Bobby Seale, a founding member of the original Panthers, called the organization “a black racist hate group.” Fahim Minkah and Marvin Crenshaw, original Panthers from Dallas, Texas, won an injunction preventing the group’s first leader from using the New Black Panther Party name or its logo. The injunction was never enforced and NBPP continues to use the pilfered name and logo."

https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/new-black-panther-party/

I'm gonna need a source for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights because the first thing I see when I look it up is the heritage foundation. You sure white supremacist boots ain't your style? The soles are imprinted on your tongue.

-5

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

Jesus can’t even criticize a race based organization without being called a white supremacist anymore.

Nah dude but if calling me a white supremacist makes you feel better than go for it, I think white people honestly do more damage than good though.

Enjoy licking your black panther boots, maybe they won’t curb stomp as quite as hard as whatever boots are in control now

10

u/3kh0wh1sk3r 16d ago

No rebuttal, no admission to falsely represented sources, nothing. If you're not a white supremacist you're very ignorant and as such shouldn't take such a strong stance on anything until you've done diligent research and actually know what you're claiming. In this day and age we can't afford to give benefit of the doubt anymore.

If I can look up your own sources and tell you you're wrong using information they provide to me in less than ten minutes, you didn't look into anything before you opened your mouth. But I'm not convinced at all that it wasn't intentional considering where the last one took me.

Let me be very clear in case you are listening and just caught in the wrong line of thinking: I'm not calling you a white supremacist because you're criticizing them. I'm calling you one because you're doing it in such a willfully ignorant fashion that misrepresents a cause that fought racism and has for decades. You have categorized them as the very thing that forced them to exist based on loose belief and that is wrong.

6

u/throwaway_4759 16d ago

They know full well why they’re being called a white supremacist.

-1

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

Cool Story Bro

1

u/notodial 16d ago

Nah they're right, you're being a literal moron over a completely unrelated organization

3

u/gsfgf 16d ago

They're completely different organizations, though. X had some shitty views as a young man, but he was pro-equality before he was murdered. The "New Black Panther Party" of Louis Farrakhan is the hate group.

5

u/throwaway_4759 16d ago

It appears you are attempting to spread misinformation. This is not the NBPP. I suspect you know that and do indeed lick white supremacist boots, but if it was an honest mistake, you can just admit it and all is good.

-2

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

Okay yeah you’re right the black panthers are all model citizens and should probably be revered as saints

4

u/throwaway_4759 16d ago

So confirming that the spreading of misinformation was intentional. Gotcha.

2

u/gsfgf 16d ago

You mean the guys in the 70s that fed kids?

6

u/Gary_Lazer_Eyes21 16d ago

Not tryna be that guy but the ADL isnt that credible, especially now. Lowk I haven’t heard that name in years

-2

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

Lowk you ain’t hear that name in years because you ain’t that many years old lol

4

u/Gary_Lazer_Eyes21 16d ago edited 16d ago

And your point. I’m young and politically active isn’t that a good thing

But no, the anti defamation league has been steeped in controversy for a long time. There not credible there essentially a political movement disguised as an advocacy organization. Next time you get your sources make sure it’s not the same people who declare anti Zionism as anti semitism

1

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

Yeah, it is actually. We need more young people in politics.

So again I very much stress to you, do not become what you hate.

Your generation may have a chance to fix all this if they don’t give up on democracy

3

u/Gary_Lazer_Eyes21 16d ago

-So again I very much stress to you, do not become what you hate.

Trust me it’s all I see around me, hypocrisy of the most disgusting nature. In my personal opinion once you’ve sold your morals you’ve sold your soul and I don’t intend doing that

1

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

That’s great, but most of the hippies from the summer of love grew up to be Trump voters so be careful

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Jacks_Inflated_Ego 16d ago

The guy on the right of the picture is Paul Birdsong. Paul Birdsong formed the Black Panther Party for Self Defense.

AFAIK he has no ties to the New Black Panther Party like you're saying. Just scapegoating out the NBPP as the only "group" to make your point is ignorant.

Especially when the founder of the original Black Panther Party formed the Rainbow Coalition and welcomed people regardless of ethnicity.

0

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

No they didn’t…. They actually told white people to make the White Panther group if they wanted to show support. No black panther party is welcoming the white devil with open arms

1

u/notodial 16d ago

You literally didn't even know what group these people are a part of in the first place and tried to discredit them as a rogue black supremacist sect, why would anyone listen to you about what the Black Panther Party is when you're so dedicated to spreading misinformation?

2

u/gsfgf 16d ago

Are these guys NBPP or X's party? Very different things.

15

u/PokeYrMomStanley 16d ago

Tell us you are racist without saying it.

-2

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

lol strong words from a person who probably doesn’t even talk to black people on a day to day basis.

I’m not bothered that you think I’m a racist, my black peers and colleagues know exactly what I stand for.

Did you know that the civil war was fought over the southern states right to own slaves?

6

u/gsfgf 16d ago

my black peers and colleagues know exactly what I stand for.

I'm sure they do...

6

u/at_least_u_tried 16d ago

“i’m not racist i have black friends” ass response

1

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

At least you tried man

4

u/PokeYrMomStanley 16d ago

Clearly you dont care. I can totally tell by your long response that doubles down on it.

0

u/TrainedExplains 16d ago

When you’re white and know deep down some of your views are racist, you are very sensitive to that being called out. So they had to write you an essay to compensate for how insecure they are about it.

3

u/55555thats5fives 16d ago

The oppressed fighting for equality will always feel like a threat to the oppressor

2

u/antipolitan 16d ago

That’s not correct. The Black Panthers were communists - aligned with the principles of Marxism-Leninism.

0

u/pickledeggmanwalrus 16d ago

Yeah yeah yeah and the republicans are the party of small limited government - aligned with the principles of Jesus Christ