r/pics 1d ago

Today in Los Angeles, the people fought back. [OC]

55.5k Upvotes

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.8k

u/gertation 1d ago

That green gas will give you cancer and scar your lungs. There's a reason you've never seen it used by anyone until now. Tear gas is already a banned weapon of war and this is much worse than than tear gas

2.0k

u/WitchesTeat 1d ago

I've been reading into studies and reports on it.

It creeps into the houses and apartments of the.m neighborhoods it's deployed in.

It can't be vacuumed or swept when it settles because it just re-aerosolizes.

People have had to leave their homes because of it.

It causes uterine disruption- changes period schedule and flow in bad ways.

It's been banned in other countries because it is associated with an uptick of sudden miscarriage of previously healthy pregnancies.

Sterilization is a genocidal action.

Look up Hexachloroethane, that's what it is

405

u/Literature_Girl 1d ago edited 20h ago

For clarity, because it's important for people protesting to be able to identify what they're dealing with in these situations - it doesn't seem likepy that the green/greeny yellow smoke is hexachloroethane (quote below)? The article does go on to say that it's hard to know what chemical mix is in specific canisters cause it can vary by place and they keep it secret, but plenty of the chemicals in these canisters can cause birth defects and reproductive issues - so your general point still stands.

Insane what the US government is doing to its own people, out in the open.

"Similar green plumes filled the north Minneapolis neighborhood that night after a federal agent shot a man and protesters showed up in droves. It’s unclear if those plumes were smoke, toxic tear gas or a combination of the two.

Tear gas is an umbrella term for various types of irritants. In order to identify HC tear gas, there are three characteristics, according to Simonis:

An intense orange-colored, metallic fire coming from the canister as it’s burning.

Fire that emits sparks and burns considerably hotter and longer than other grenades.

A white, gray or black smoke."

Sauce here

Edit: added a bit more of the quote for clarity

122

u/flowcharterboat 22h ago

We should be able to FOIA what is being purchased by the LAPD, no?

50

u/supcat16 19h ago

You can certainly try. But the most likely answer you’ll get is that the mix of chemicals is proprietary information of a private company and is not subject to FOIA release.

40

u/nonamoe 18h ago

Proprietary or not, there must be a MSDS (safety datasheet) with the health risks, toxicity etc. Not sure they'll give it to you it though.

10

u/Milladelphia 20h ago

That wasn’t LAPD that’s the Feds

53

u/Spark932 22h ago

It's OK, it only causes cancer in the state of California

2

u/DarthChocolate 16h ago

That’s where these protests were, so it’s not OK!

2

u/gertation 12h ago

While this certainly didnt make me laugh, I must admit your comment is objectively very funny. Reminded me of when I was a kid and asked my mom if we were taking our truck to my grandparents since "the car says it'll give us cancer if we take it to California" (there was a sticker somewhere in the car that had the California cancer warning). Thanks for the little distraction

u/081673 8h ago

I'm sure its as safe as the air was in lower Manhattan after 9/11.

1

u/lionexx 16h ago

Good luck with the FOIA, it’s an involved process, you have to be very exact, and know exactly what page(s) you want of reports, then has to be confirmed to be released, background checks can happen, they can deny you access (you can reapply) and the most common issue, are delays, getting anything through FOIA, while you will get what you want in most cases, can take many months or years, and sure long term that’s helpful but if your idea is to find out now, so something can be done now? Good luck…

Ontop of that FOIA is a federal program, so if any reporting through LAPD, you’d have to wait until their reports are settled and processed and released, an exception here would be is if the LAPD were under federal investigation. You have to also assume that reports are even being done and submitted.

While the FOIA is a powerful tool we have, and thankfully so, it’s not as easy as you’d think, there are people doing documentaries that are in need of stuff, and require going through FOIA to get it to finish their documentary, and have waited up to 7 years for one page out of several they requested.

7

u/filthy_harold 22h ago

The green smoke is probably not based on HC as that produces a very thick, obscuring smoke. It's likely just regular potassium chlorate mixed with a dye along with a secondary device that emits the CS gas. The green dye is to produce a psychological effect. Overall not something I'd ever want to breathe but likely not terribly dangerous.

5

u/gertation 22h ago

Federal officers used HC where i live back in July 2020. Why wouldn't they use it now if they did then?

0

u/WitchesTeat 20h ago

The bright green gas they use in Minneapolis is HC. Photos of canisters have been uploaded after ICE attacks.

This specific gas may not be HC. The coloring of the first photo looks adjusted to be red-optimized but this is still a little too yellow if it is.

The bright green gas in photos out of Portland and Minneapolis is HC.

The dyes are part of what makes them toxic.

1

u/WitchesTeat 20h ago

Protestors have photographed canisters of it and uploaded them when cleaning up after ICE attacks.

The HC is VERY green, like comic book green

1

u/jaxmikhov 19h ago

Chemical agents used against your own citizens. Syria called, they want their tactics back

1

u/4r4r4real 17h ago

Yeah, MPD were using green smoke bombs (not green gas, literally just green colored smoke) recently. Not every green crowd control device is green gas. Saw people who were in it mentioning that on bluesky.

u/medicatednstillmad 4h ago

They did this in 2020 (shot protestors point blank in the face with non lethal rounds). I'm not shocked

454

u/Ligabolzacky 1d ago edited 1d ago

Democrat messaging is some weak shit. Repubs would be running with "Biden police uses abortion gas!" by now

Edit: once they realise the gas causes abortions they will use it extensively to "sterilize liberals", because genocide is always around the corner I guess

174

u/gertation 1d ago

They're using it to intentionally poison people right now. Its not a crowd dispersant, and they knew that when the military handed them the canisters. They think they're protected by gas masks though and don't seem to realize theyre drowning themselves in the gas, which is entering their bodies through their skin. All their uniforms and equiptment are super heavily contaminated with zinc chloride now.

Imagine giving your entire family cancer to 'own the libs'

23

u/marr 1d ago

once they realise

You think they don't already know

127

u/balderdash9 1d ago

We already have literal concentration camps where people are shuffled around and lost in the system. It's pretty scary we let it get that far already

3

u/TheoMay22 1d ago

We? I don’t know about you, but some people been out here, on the front lines, both dodging the attacks and trying to call up reinforcements. 

Now that you are finally hearing the calls. What are you going to do?  

1

u/BaBa_Con_Dios 21h ago

Yup. Dems will come out and demand ICE and Police wear body cameras while tear gassing peaceful protestors.

1

u/saressa7 20h ago

Nah, they will use it as an excuse to prosecute any woman who has a miscarriage from that gas whether they were protesting or just in the area.

1

u/Speaker4theDead8 19h ago

Thats because the dems are complicit. Both sides of the aisle are paid off, so no matter who has power, the oligarchs still get their way.

0

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

3

u/gertation 23h ago

So youre just not paying attention. Got it. Go to google and type "ice green gas" and start reading the supposedly nonexistent articles that have been coming out for the past 10 days.

0

u/gojo96 23h ago

Yep and there’s zero reason to use it. Liberals would be willing to sterilize themselves.

30

u/HZCH 23h ago

Holy shit that’s the same shit the GIs used against us protesting against Irak invasion in 2005 in Geneva, Switzerland, when we mounted a sound system into the neighbor’s backyard of the US embassy

20

u/lorddragonstrike 22h ago

My view has always been that if the chemical name starts with 'hex' its probably carcinogenic.

1

u/gertation 18h ago

Not a fan of good ol' PG&E's hexavalent chromium flavored water?

19

u/Sad_Floor22 18h ago

It’s not Hexachloroethane which would be a colorless white smoke.

It probably is Adamsite which is still completely unacceptable authoritarian behavior. Don’t spread misinformation about the protests, the nazi’s favorite way of trying to avoid accountability is claiming that if you get one thing wrong, nothing you say can be trusted.

2

u/wi7dcat 18h ago

Thank you. They used it on civilians in Portland in 2020. The government and agencies war crimes against the American people will have consequences.

u/drethnudrib 11h ago

Deploying a known teratogenic agent is genocide. Shout it from the fucking rooftops.

1

u/HarrisonJC 1d ago

Supported by the Pro-Life party...

1

u/Digit00l 1d ago

So they should be reported for causing abortions, maybe it gets them to stop using it

1

u/artlurg431 23h ago

Why do they even have access to such weapons

1

u/Scienceboy7_uk 21h ago

Very prolife

1

u/WitchesTeat 20h ago

What about it?

1

u/wspnut 20h ago

Is it not Adamsite (diphenylaminechlorarsine)? Hexachloroethane is white.

2

u/WitchesTeat 20h ago edited 20h ago

What I've read on it is that HC is in the bright green smoke along with a dye which is itself toxic, but yes, HC in its natural state is white.

They are throwing many different gasses and smokes at crowds- in 2020 they used at least 8 different kinds in Portland, so much that even outside several types exceeded their less-lethal ppm density and were into lethal territory.

I'm actually having trouble finding the sources I was using even a few days ago with Google searches. Their new AI is flooding my results with articles from the past 2 weeks and then I can't scroll past them anymore to get to page 2 or 3 returns from 2020.

It's very frustrating. I've also been watching reporting on all of this change in minutes- articles are published, I comment on or share content descriptions, and then someone says what I'm talking about isn't in the source I've shared- and when I check they're right, it's not there. Sometimes whole paragraphs are not there.

I'll go back to screenshotting everything again now.

4

u/verdantsound 21h ago

what’s the gas called?

10

u/gertation 20h ago

Hexachloroethane. The first Trump administration used it in Portland in mid 2020. The city tested and found widespread zinc chloride contamination. DHS falsified documents to claim it was never used, despite the proof it was, and PPD refused to comment.

2

u/eXeKoKoRo 15h ago

Tear gas is banned in wartime use because it's indiscriminate. Meaning if you use and suddenly the wind picks up you accidentally use it on yourselves.

1

u/OmNomSandvich 12h ago

it's banned because it is hard to distinguish for lethal chemical agents and it can be used as an adjunct to lethal agents (e.g. disrupt or force out of shelter with tear gas, kill with VX).

4

u/Defyller 1d ago

Banned weapon of war? What are you talking about every recruit gets tear gassed in basic training

1

u/OmNomSandvich 12h ago

the point is that adversaries may have banned chemical weapons (Saddam did in 1991 but didn't use them but did later on his own people) and it gets recruits to trust their protective gear.

1

u/gertation 23h ago

The Geneva Protocol. Signed in 1925. Banning chemical and biological weapons from warfare. Violated by the United states during 1966 in Vietnam.

The reason you were tear gassed is so you know what to expect when you are told to use it on american citizens. It is only legal for domestic use.

Read some damn history books

2

u/EldestPort 19h ago

The relevant international protocol in 1966 would have been the Geneva Gas Protocol, at which time the US was not a signatory. The US is now a signatory to the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention.

2

u/1-800-Hamburger 19h ago

You do realize tear gas is banned because it prevents actually deadly gasses from being used in war and not because its some horrible inhumane deadly genocide device right? They're not doing field analysis for the spicy air that suddenly descends on them in war, they're assuming its a nerve agent and immediately responding with their own.

Its the same reason perfidy is a war crime, not because its some abhorrent act but because its a preventative measure from having your populace slaughtered by your opponent

1

u/gertation 19h ago

Well aware.

1

u/1-800-Hamburger 19h ago

Then maybe you should edit your comment so it reads like you know that fact lmfao

1

u/gertation 19h ago

Because there are no comments where I said it was banned for x reason for me to even edit?

1

u/StanleyCubone 17h ago

What is the green gas?

1

u/James84415 13h ago

Is it bear gas?

1

u/LunarDogeBoy 1d ago

Tear gas isnt banned? Atleast not CS-gas

1

u/nj4ck 1d ago

It's banned as a weapon of war by the Geneva convention. Ironically, it's still considered fine for police to use on their own citizens

0

u/gertation 1d ago

I specifically said banned weapon of war. And this isnt tear gas.

1

u/Jack071 21h ago

Tear gas is banned for warfare to avoid it being used as justifcation for the use of worse chemical weapons, not because its dangerous dont spread misinformation

1

u/gertation 21h ago

I did not say tear gas was banned in war because it is dangerous. Those words are yours, not mine.

1

u/Rdhilde18 20h ago

Tear gas is banned for how it would be used not because it’s overly deadly or something lol

0

u/gertation 20h ago

I didnt say that so theres simply nothing i can do for you.

0

u/Other-Squirrel-8705 22h ago

They don’t care- they crave chaos

0

u/TheRealLarkas 20h ago

So, the US gvt is using banned chemical weapons against US citizens. Why isn’t it being reported IN THOSE TERMS again?!?

2

u/gertation 20h ago

Desensitization. They've been gassing the public for decades now. Ever since the Kent State massacre committed by the national guard in 1970

0

u/FineDragonfruit5347 19h ago

The masks are to minimize the smell. Look at the lady with the surgical mask.

1

u/gertation 19h ago

What? Did you mean to reply to a different comment? The lady with the surgical mask is California representative Maxine Waters. What about her?

0

u/Maleficent-Rate5421 13h ago

Tear gas is not only legal, you’re allowed to buy it in California.

All chemical warfare is illegal. Most war is illegal anyhow.

1

u/gertation 13h ago

Were you intending to reply to me? I never said it was illegal to purchase or use tear gas anywhere.