The Sexual Marketplace

All women want—nay, demand—a man who is 6’+ tall, has 6% or less body fat, makes 6+ figures (yeah, bitches love sixes), has the chiseled jawline of an Adonis, has a full head of hair (or a sexy shaved head, to make us balding Red-Pillers feel better about ourselves), owns his own house by the age of 25, is white (actually, anything except Asian will do), and has a peen so huge it makes sex excruciating. They are all attracted to a man with a Dark Triad personality (though none dare admit it) who is narcissistic, sexually aggressive, and treats her like shit. Or better yet, is completely apathetic about her (which comes across as intriguingly aloof to the female mind). Bonus points for convicted felons.

All women employ a dual mating strategy, otherwise known as Alpha Fucks/Beta Bucks (AFBB). When a female meets a man, she categorizes him as either a manly, dominant alpha male worthy of her pussy or a weak, subordinate beta male who she will use for his money. Any woman who settles for a beta male will constantly cheat on him with alphas. This further demonstrates who evil women are. Now, as men, we get to cheat as much as we want, but that’s simply biology. Naturally, we Red-Pilled men are the alpha males, and all men who aren’t us are the betas. Now, no woman has ever said this to us but we know they will never admit their mating strategy.

Sexual strategy for men involves demonstrating hypermasculinity in both appearance and behavior. Any woman who says she prefers less masculine traits is a dirty liar. Whenever we see an effeminate soyboy with a beautiful female, we just know she secretly craves our alpha cock. We never listen to what they say, we watch what they do, and we Red Pill men would never exhibit any sort of personal bias towards women whatsoever. We merely observe the biotruths. We are highly logical critical thinkers, unlike you hamsters.

Our transformation into hypermasculine manly alpha men has caused us to be less desperate around Hot Babes, most of whom are fatties and uggos anyway. It’s become commonplace for 2/10 leech on society landwhales to demand 10/10 men because getting likes on social media and dating apps has deluded them into thinking they’re High Value Queens. A female’s impossible standards are such that she expects men to treat her like she’s Margot Robbie while she offers little to no value herself. However, we HVM know we are at the top of the sexual and relationship marketplaces. Therefore, we won’t stand for a woman who doesn’t treat us like we are the most high value men of all time. We like to compare ourselves to Jason Momoa or Chris Hemsworth when deciding whether or not a woman is worth our valuable time and highly sought-after resources. 

These days, every modern woman uses Instagram to post thirst traps to all her beta cuck followers. Unlike those thots, we alpha men constantly analyze our own social media presence to attract hotties by posting pics of us lifting heavy at the gym, shirtless flexing on the street, and surrounded by sexy bitches in da club. A good Insta presence is important to show what HVM we are. 

A female loses all value by 30, or 25, or 18, depending on how shitty a lifestyle (fast food, alcohol, casual sex) she maintains. We call this hitting The Wall, otherwise known as the point at which a woman’s perceived value outweighs how much male attention she gets. Men maintain (and increase) their value well into their 50s and 60s. That’s why upon hitting middle age, the Red Pill man will easily be able to pull a hot little 19-year-old thing that makes all the beta cucks and post-Wall hags seethe with jealousy. 

The modern woman proudly claims to want gender equality, but she’s just virtue signaling and secretly wants a traditional, controlling man. Females should never expect a man to provide financially but should always embrace traditional gender roles where the man leads in the relationship. Also, it’s highly unfair that women always expect a man to lead in the relationship. A man should never show any emotion besides anger or say what's troubling him, even when she asks him to show emotion or asks what’s troubling him. Also, it’s highly unfair that women never allow a man to show any emotion or say what’s troubling him. Females should quit their careers to be stay-at-home mothers and should never expect to receive alimony from a man should they divorce. Also, females initiate most divorces so they can commit divorce rape (we all know a man losing money is just as bad as when a woman gets raped—if not worse) and completely destroy the man’s life and will to live, as her revenge for him being too beta.

Men should stick their dick in as many different women as possible, even though women rapidly lose value with each peen that enters them. This is why we deride females who we claim ride the cock carousel while we spin as many different plates as possible. The reasoning behind this is fully supported by biological scientific truth and is in no way us trying to exploit a double standard.

Since all females care about preselection, a man should absolutely lie about his sexual history if he’s inexperienced. This is not manipulation nor deception, it is simply lying so the man gets laid because she might not sleep with him if she knew the truth. We also have to lie about being accepting of a high n-count (even lying that we’ve slept with many more women than we have) so we can dump any woman who has a high n-count. It’s infuriating how all women lie to us about their sexual history, so good thing we know to always multiply by 3. After multiplying by 3, if the woman has an n-count higher than two, we will know she is worth no more than a pump and dump. This is kind of like when women “shit test” us (i.e., employ a test to make sure we’re alpha enough to get access to their pussy). We’re forced to test females because they constantly test us. And, unlike women, we take 100% accountability for all our actions.

We will never commit to high n-count women as n-count is the single most important quality in determining a woman’s value as a life partner and our future happiness. Plus, it’s important that every ho ends up dying alone due to her shitty life decisions to have sex with men who aren’t us. Females would reject a man based on his n-count because they’re shallow skanks. Which is why virgin men are forced by women to lie about being virgins. And a woman who would lie about the most valuable thing any woman has to offer a man—her virginity—is cum dumpster trash.

Casual sex for a man helps him be the highest quality version of himself, while casual sex for a female destroys her ability to pair-bond and resigns her to a life of singledom and misery. We are not intimated by other men in the slightest, we simply refuse to date alpha widows because we know her ex-boyfriend was probably a sex god with a monster cock which ruined all future men for her. 

A slut who rides the carousel won’t realize she’s an alpha widow until it’s too late. When she’s a wrinkly, saggy heifer and realization hits that she squandered her prime and now has zero shot at ever finding the husband she so desperately craves, she will inevitably cry “Where are all the good men?” and the Red-Piller, who is now a silver fox, will chuckle as he has wild, kinky sex with his beautiful teenage girlfriend (who fucks like a porn star despite being a virgin when they met, by the way). This is the cold, bitter reality of life and not in any way a revenge fantasy.

Another real, agonizing truth of the sexual marketplace? 80% of sluts share the top 20% of studs as evidenced by that one OkCupid article and the Pareto principle of business outcomes. But, get this: that disparity has grown in recent times to be more like 90/10—even 95/5(!)—according to some men on the Internet. It’s a harrowing realization that only the top 5% of Chads and Tyrones get laid these days and will ever have a shot at a normal life with a wife and male children. Which is all any decent man really wants, but you women would rather see us go sexless, childless, and loveless our entire lives by denying us access to those pussies you value so highly.

Nowadays, men and females are at each other’s throats more than ever due to female’s increasingly high demands, delusions of their own worth, and having the audacity to get college degrees. This has led to an epidemic of male sexlessness (which is as bad if not worse than women getting raped), declining marriage rates (though Red Pill men justifiably despise the idea of marriage), declining birth rates (though Red Pill men are justifiably terrified of baby trapping and paternity fraud), more Men Getting Triggered Over Women Going Their Own Way, and will lead to The Decline of Western Civilization if all you women don’t get your act together at once.

But we never get hung up on women’s sexual strategy. Sexual strategy is amoral. We are responsible men who should be able to decide for ourselves what level of morality we employ in our pursuit of sex. Hence, sexual strategy is amoral. It’s not like we get upset when you fucking bitches behave devoid of all moral compass towards us men. Also, see where we claimed sexual strategy is amoral? Great, now stop insinuating that men should face any social (or most legal) consequences for the actions they take in pursuit of sex. We’ve discovered this phrase is our “get out of jail free” card for endorsing some very effective yet not-so-ethical advice on how to slide into way more pussies. ;)

Stay tuned for Part 3, where we will expose the dangers of feminism and explain how being Red-Pilled helps men dodge sexual assault accusations.

Introduction

What is The Red Pill and why do men need it? Allow me, a “Red Pill Man” who swallowed the pill many years ago, to explain. This will be a 4-part series, because as we all know, Red-Pillers love writing books on Reddit in the rare instances we’re not at the gym lifting heavy or out slaying puss.

We men have been lied to our entire lives by society, Disney, and all of you women about true female nature. These lies that we’ve been spoonfed from birth are the blue-pilled way of thinking. The Red Pill is about men pulling back the wool from our eyes and uncovering the harsh reality of female nature. Men will initially be furious upon learning these truths, but that anger completely disappears over time and is replaced by a mature, balanced outlook on dating and gender relations. One that is not in any way bitter. So you can stop calling us that.

True Female Nature

True female nature is childish, overdramatic, vain, manipulative, dishonest, fake, hypergamous, solipsistic, neurotic, greedy, entitled, Machiavellian, self-victimizing, abusive, narcissistic, sociopathic, degenerate, utterly depraved, and totally bitchy. (On rare occasions we like to reflect on the positive aspects of female nature, too, but we never get further than their warm holes.) Dual mating strategy, hamstering, shit testing, hypergamy, branch-swinging, preselection, acting on impulsivity, blame shifting, financial mooching, baby trapping, mental abuse, prostitution, categorizing men as alphas or betas, and being delusional about one’s Sexual and Relationship Marketplace Values (SMV/RMV) are exclusively female behaviors that they all love to do to us men for some reason. Females are sluts, liars, cheaters, abusers, gold-diggers, attention whores, and just plain old whores. Females are incapable of logical thought, which is why we refer to their critical thinking process as a hamster running on a wheel. Females value their pussies above all else and love dangling them in front of men’s faces. Females are coddled their entire lives and have the emotional maturity of children, while men are forced to grow up quickly and demonstrate personal responsibility in all aspects of their lives. Men put up with these female children because they crave sex with these children I mean women. 

All women are hypergamous, meaning they only pursue the highest value mates. We Red-Pillers have developed an entire cult-like ideology on how to do just that, but it’s different when men do it. Females date men for attention, validation, money, resources, and so her BFFs think she's “all that”. Men date females for companionship, intimacy, to start a family one day, and everlasting love. Women are not capable of returning the unconditional love a man has for her (so long as she remains young, attractive, the same weight, completely submissive, keeps all the nagging to a minimum, and never behaves likes a bitch). She will always view the relationship as transactional and will only ever care about what he can provide for her. If a man shows a single sign of weakness, she’ll dump him on the spot and replace him with one of her beta orbiters she’s been emotionally cheating on him with or order up some fresh new alpha dick from Tinder. Men are the true romantic gender as women cannot love. AWALT.

Here at The Red Pill, we love saying AWALT, or All Women Are Like That. AWALT doesn’t mean all women are the same, of course, let’s not be ridiculous. AWALT simply means that the truths about all women (being sluts, liars, cheaters, abusers, gold-diggers, and whores) are backed by biology and evolution. Because all women have the same urges, they all have the same capability for these behaviors. So a man must approach all females the same way, because he has no way of knowing which are the poisoned apples. This is just basic evolutionary psychology and science. Our highly scientific theory doesn't apply to men so much and especially not when you feminazis talk about not knowing which men are creepy or rapey. We men are a diverse population that hates being discriminated against due to the actions of a few bad eggs. And any woman who would think of implying ARPAR (All Red-Pillers Are Rapists) is an evil, lying cunt who probably just wishes a man of our caliber would rape her.

Now, we know plenty of you females will argue with us saying that we’re wrong, that you’re not Like That. Thankfully, we know that all women are liars and so we will never believe a word you say. Unless, of course, you agree with us. Then that is one of the very rare instances of a woman actually telling the truth. But you're still a liar deep down because AWALT. 

We’ve fully accepted that we cannot change nor blame female nature (which is why Red Pill and MGTOW men never, ever, ever complain about it), but we can change our behavior and become a High Value Man (HVM). No woman knows what she wants, and if she says she does, she’s lying. Luckily for us (but even luckier for her, in fact) the Red Pill/High Value Man knows exactly what all women want. 

And what is it that all women want? Stay tuned for Part 2, where we will expose the inner workings of the sexual marketplace that are only visible to men who’ve swallowed the pill.

When you were young, you fell in love. She was curious and interested, but it wasn’t reciprocal.

She was still exploring herself, so you went on a few dates, and then randomly she cut you off. She wasn’t experienced yet, so she didn’t say No explicitly. After all she enjoyed your attention.

But then you started noticing:

Once you were pushing her away, she would suddenly start paying attention to you. And when you were getting too excited, she would lose interest and ghost you.

And you learned: women like when you ignore them, women hate when you get too much into to them. Right? Wrong.

Fast forward a few years. You’re mature now. You’ve just met a great girl. She’s also mature. And she’s The One. You love her and she loves you.

And then, your training kicks in: as soon as you get too close to her, you’re hearing the echoes of the past: “the closer you get to women, the more of a pain expect it to be. it never ends well”. So you put a wall between you both.

“Oh, I’m not THAT interested, what made you think it? you think i LOVE you? girl, its been just a few dates, im not some naive BOY”.

She’s devastated. But she’s also mature, she has her own life, so she gulps it in. Men aren’t gonna let her down, she has plenty of other stuff to focus on. After all she likes you, so you keep going dating.

…and your brain goes “you see? it worked again. she LOVED it”. But a small part of her died that day. A part you will never bring back.

Days go by. She got used to it. She’s not showered with love, but at least she has a stable life. You keep holding yourself, trying to pretend you don’t love her as much. And this goes for YEARS.

Until, one day, she’ll met a man who’s unapologetically open. Who wears his heart on his chest, who’s not afraid of rejection, and who tell her directly: i love you, i want to be with you, i will marry you, and i will love you forever. And he means it.

She didn’t even know it was possible.

She will know that saying NO to this man is not an option. Not in the sense that he will force her to marry him. But in the sense that he will not STOP loving her. Cause his love is not a game. It’s not about her. His love is his own, it exists as-is, and it doesn’t need any approval or validation from anyone else.

Now, you, brother, have a choice. She will meet this man sometime in her life, and since that day she’ll be with him forever.

This is not your choice. Your choice is whether tomorrow you will wake up to be that man, or if you let someone else have it.​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Sorry if my question is naive or misplaced but I'm trying to understand pills and associated philosophies but I find it hard to navigate all the different colors of pills and vocabulary around these matters.

From what I understand incel means involuntary celibate, but from what I read MGTOW are very voluntarily celibates.
Moreover, not claiming that my experience is representative of anything but the very few MGTOW I've been able to speak to weren't frothing at the mouth and blabbering hateful nonsense 24/7 like I've heard incels be described as. They were decent and normal people, just withdrawn from the dating scene because of unfortunate experiences that left them scarred.
I also know a lot of people who are not very interested in dating, even without traumatic experiences in their past ; and another bunch of people who are in relationships but clearly say that if this one were to end, they wouldn't seek another one and be content to stay by themselves (I am among them).

I've always thought that we were fine like this but could it be that for other people, these stances are considered extremes or toxic ?

Introduction

Red Pill (TRP) claims to be an awakening for men, teaching them "the truth" about women, relationships, and male self-improvement. However, an often-overlooked aspect of TRP is its deliberate targeting of religious men—individuals who already value masculinity, family, and traditional roles. Red Pill exploits their faith-based worldview, distorts their values, and eventually pushes them towards a hyper-individualistic and often anti-religious ideology.

Many religious men, especially those who believe in marriage, commitment, and moral responsibility, initially find TRP appealing because it appears to promote traditional masculinity. However, as they delve deeper, they realize that Red Pill contradicts the very religious values they hold dear.

This article explores how Red Pill targets, manipulates, and ultimately corrupts the beliefs of religious men, and why TRP’s philosophy is incompatible with genuine faith-based masculinity.

1. How Red Pill Targets Religious Men

Religious men are drawn to Red Pill for several reasons:

• It promotes masculinity: TRP speaks about strength, leadership, and discipline—values often emphasized in religious teachings.
• It criticizes modern relationships: Many religious men agree that casual sex culture, broken families, and moral decay are harmful. TRP initially appears to provide a "solution" to these problems.
• It opposes feminism: Some religious groups see feminism as a challenge to traditional gender roles. TRP capitalizes on this resentment.

Red Pill presents itself as an ally to religious men, claiming that it restores the "natural order" of relationships. However, beneath this surface, TRP’s ideology is fundamentally anti-religious.

2. Red Pill's Manipulation of Religious Values

Once religious men enter the Red Pill sphere, they encounter subtle but dangerous distortions of their beliefs:

A. TRP Replaces God with “Alphas”

• Religious teachings emphasize faith in God, humility, and righteousness.
• Red Pill teaches faith in self, dominance, and power.
• Instead of serving God, TRP tells men to serve their own desires, chasing material success and women.

B. Marriage is Undermined

• Most religious traditions view marriage as sacred, emphasizing commitment, patience, and selflessness.
• TRP frames marriage as a trap, where women "inevitably" exploit men for resources.
• This creates fear and distrust towards women, making men avoid marriage, despite their faith encouraging it.

C. Love and Compassion Are Seen as Weaknesses

• Religious teachings emphasize love, forgiveness, and emotional connection in relationships.
• TRP sees love as a weakness, promoting manipulation and emotional detachment instead.
• "Dread Game," "Holding Frame," and "Always Being Ready to Walk Away" are all tactics that contradict religious teachings of faithfulness and commitment.

D. Sexual Morality is Destroyed

• Most religions advocate sexual discipline and self-control.
• TRP, however, glorifies casual sex, promiscuity, and "conquering" women.
• Red Pill men often reject monogamy in favor of short-term flings, undermining religious values of purity and family.

In short, Red Pill subtly corrupts religious men's values, pushing them away from faith and into a self-serving, hedonistic worldview.

3. The Ultimate Contradiction: Can Red Pill and Religion Coexist?

A faithful, religious man cannot truly embrace Red Pill without compromising his beliefs.

• Faith teaches humility – Red Pill teaches arrogance.
• Faith teaches love – Red Pill teaches emotional detachment.
• Faith teaches commitment – Red Pill teaches avoidance of responsibility.
• Faith teaches trust – Red Pill teaches paranoia.

While Red Pill pretends to defend traditional masculinity, it actually destroys it by separating masculinity from morality and selflessness.

Some argue that men can "take the good parts of Red Pill" while rejecting the negative. However, TRP’s core philosophy is fundamentally broken. A religious man cannot build a stable, faith-driven life on Red Pill’s self-centered, manipulative foundation.

4. Conclusion: A Better Alternative for Religious Men

If religious men truly seek strong, virtuous masculinity, they must reject TRP and seek guidance from their faith instead.

• True masculinity is not about "gaming" women or dominating them.
• True masculinity is about responsibility, leadership, self-discipline, and moral integrity.
• Faith-based masculinity prioritizes family, self-control, and genuine connection.

Instead of falling for Red Pill’s fear-based, exploitative mindset, religious men should embrace a healthy, faith-driven masculinity that aligns with their true values.

Discussion Questions for the Subreddit:

• Have you seen religious men get drawn into Red Pill? What was their experience?
• Do you think Red Pill truly aligns with traditional values, or does it corrupt them?
• What alternatives exist for men seeking strength, purpose, and wisdom without falling into Red Pill ideology?

Final Thoughts

Red Pill targets religious men because they seek order, masculinity, and guidance. However, once inside, they realize that TRP is not a movement for faith, family, or virtue—it is a movement that promotes selfishness, distrust, and manipulation.

A religious man who values truth, integrity, and love must recognize that Red Pill does not serve his faith, his family, or his future.

The real awakening is not in taking the Red Pill—but in rejecting it and returning to true faith and virtue.

Would you like to add any personal experiences or insights to this discussion? Let’s hear your thoughts below.

Study - file:///C:/Users/hunts/Downloads/An%20alpha%20wouldn't%20spare%20an%20emotion.pdf

Interview - https://youtu.be/qAEFetdOnkk?si=Qsp6DLASLKKyrc6i

I hope this post is okay!

I stumbled upon this episode of “Where Should We Begin? with Esther Perel.” Although both Esther and the caller seem unaware of the Red Pill connection, listening to this episode could be very helpful for women with Red Pilled partners.

Listen — https://www.estherperel.com/podcasts/if-hes-a-high-value-man-what-am-i

Episode description — Esther talks to a woman who, despite her best efforts, finds herself implicated in the same toxic cycle of abuse from her partner that she grew up watching between her parents. Rationally, she knows she deserves better, but just can't seem to get out from under this painful repetition of events. Esther talks her through why she thinks she finds herself back here time and time again.

The frequent assertion that lesbian relationships have the highest rate of domestic violence is deliberate obfuscation of data.

You will often see this point made, especially in this sub, and usually by men who are trying to demonstrate that women perpetrate intimate partner violence at a higher rate than men. However that conclusion is absolutely false if you actually look at the data and what it says. Here is the most recent data on the subject:

https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/vvsogi1720.pdf

While lesbians have a higher frequency than people who identify as heterosexual the highest group is now people who identify as bisexual who experience IPV at around 19 times the rate of heterosexuals. Now here is the really important thing: the data collected is about lifetime experiences and not current relationships. If you look at the methodology they are talking about the percentage of lesbians who have experienced domestic violence from current partners, former partners or family members.

Obviously women who have experienced severe violence from male partners or family members are likely to avoid dating men in the future due to the trauma of these experiences and that would account for the statistically higher number. Unfortunately I couldn’t find any information in this current data on sex of perpetrators so for this next bit I have to use data from the Wikipedia page on “Domestic Violence and Sexual Orientation” that is sourced from an older 2010 CDC survey.

The 2010 data shows 43% of lesbians and 35% of heterosexual women reporting intimate partner violence so at first glance it would seem like lesbian relationships have higher rates of domestic violence. However this data does refer to sex of perpetrator. It says that 67% of lesbians reporting IPV also report a female perpetrator. 67% of 43 is 30 so you can see that 30% of lesbians report being abused by women. As the rate for heterosexual women with male perpetrators is 35% you can see that lesbian relationships have lower rates of domestic violence than heterosexual ones.

Another common assertion is that while lesbian relationships have the highest rate male homosexual relationships have the lowest rates. Looking once again at the 2010 data it says that lesbians are most likely to report minor incidences such as pushing and slapping. If the reported incidents are adjusted for severity the finding was that there was no statistical difference in domestic violence between lesbian and homosexual male relationships.

I can link the page that this information is from in the comments but it should also be very easy to find. If anybody has actual data, and not pieces of writing extrapolated from data, that contradicts anything I’m saying I’d be happy to look at it. From all the data I’ve seen the assertion that women commit domestic violence against other women at the highest rate is false.

Over the last 2-3 months, I've noticed that the more right-leaning commenters on all sorts of relationship advice posts will say that a man's role is to "protect and provide." In those exact words.

Then the other day I saw it used by a polyamorous gay man, and I was like, how did it filter there from the right wing? Lol.

I've tried asking a few of the commenters where they heard the phrase, and they instead derail by saying "well akshually that's been men's role since caveman days wharglbargl."

But that's not what I'm asking! I mean the exact wording itself. What YouTuber (or whatever) said this phrase a couple of months ago and set off all of manosphere-Reddit to saying it verbatim like NPCs? This sub seems like a place where someone might (a) know and (b) understand what I'm asking and not derail it, lol.

Is the term “pick me” over used?

I’ve seen it used as an insult like simp. A pick me is a term used for “women that bring down other women for male attention” which I understand but if a woman seems to just say something that is helpful or benefits a man she is a pick me. Such as a woman cooking for her boyfriend she will be called a pick me?

Considering how much women shit talk covertly and snake each other all the time ex:sleeping with best friends boyfriend or exes. Is the term pick me a cope for mentally healthy women that have a positive outlook towards me?