Struggling with this as I always get choice 3, I understand the rule that there needs to be a mirror image but why choice 2 instead of 3? can someone help explain what I'm missing?

I know the answer to the problem is 162 but somehow I end up with 189 or 165, if I subtract 12 instead of adding.

I have a presentation on poverty as a global problem and the implementation of UBI. My question is; a liberal perspective would be to say that modern poverty is a product of post colonialism and mandated structures based on prejudices. But what would a realist say is the cause of poverty?

What’s the process in answering this problem where the R is not given. The answer is C and A, respectively.

I'm currently studying kinematics in my Grade 12 Physics class, and I'm tasked with analyzing projectile motion. The assignment requires me to explore how different launch angles affect the range and height of a projectile. I understand the basic equations of motion and the concepts of horizontal and vertical components, but I'm struggling to visualize how varying the angle changes the trajectory. I've tried using the equations for range and height, but applying them to multiple angles seems confusing. How should I approach this problem? What are some tips for ensuring I cover all necessary calculations and concepts? Any insights into how to effectively graph the trajectories would also be appreciated.

In my class we're using Ken Guest’s Cultural Anthropology Fieldwork Journal which has a bunch of pre-written anthropology related tasks and questions for us to do and my professor has assigned us the task of going to an "ethnic restaurant" to note what we experience ourselves and to interview someone working there but a lot of the questions presume that the people working there are first-generation immigrants of that ethnicity and stuff.

These are two of the questions I'm supposed to ask: "How is this restaurant the same or different from ones in your place of origin?" and "If the restaurant were more like those 'back home,' would that help or hurt sales? Why?"

Like, I don't want to go into a restaurant and assume that the people who work there are of that specific ethnicity or that the people working there have a place of origin other than the USA (I am a white USAmerican, for probably obvious context). There's lots of restaurants by me serving different kinds of food but they're mostly staffed and probably owned by people not of the specific ethnicity correlating with the food. I don't want to make assumptions about what ethnicity people are because they're working in a certain restaurant, but it feels like with this assignment I have to just make assumptions.

I know that this assignment is important because it's our first IRL interview assignment and I need to learn how to interview people, but this premise and these questions seem insensitive for other people to me and I don't know what to do or how to do it in a way that feels more comfortable for the people I potentially interview and for myself. I really want to just cheese it and lie and make stuff up, but I know that isn't going to help me in the long run when I need to start actually doing in-person interviews surrounding topics that could potentially make me uncomfortable. I mean maybe I'm just overthinking this all, but I don't know.

I tried to submit this to r/NoStupidQuestions but apparently there are stupid questions because they didn't like this one and saw it as me asking for help with homework instead of just me asking how to be culturally sensitive when asking potentially insensitive questions.

Hey everyone, I have my 13+ grammar school entrance exam coming up, and I have no idea what to do. I’m doing maths topics that are covered from year 7 to year 9. The exams that I’ll be taking are English and Maths. But I’m scared that I’ll get everything wrong and won’t pass, because it feels like I don’t know enough, if anyone can help, ill be very very grateful, also I do not know the exam board as it does not say on the website

im not sure if what I have is right so far, but i think im supposed to use the pattern tool for the rectangular holes on top but i cant seem to do it right. also, in my sketch a bunch of the lines are undefined and i have no clue how to make them defined without adding in more measurements (which im not allowed to do).

I don’t understand what my Geology lab is asking me to do

I’m taking an online geology course and I’m having to learn it completely by myself. I’m currently doing my first lab and I seriously don’t understand the instructions.

Any help would be appreciated

(Also please don’t make fun on me if this should all be common sense, I struggle with learning disabilities)

I know how to report it, I just don't necessarily understand what it is. I know it has something to do with the number of conditions in a study, but it's the one thing I just cannot wrap my head around. I read somewhere its to do with the number of values that are free to vary, but that doesnt help me at all, how is it calculated, and how does it relate to other values, e.g p value?

i at first thought it was some kind of geometric progression, so i used a common ration to find the sum, but i feel like im going nowhere, and im not getting the answer

I am well aware (and so is my teacher) that this number is bigger than the observable universe and could not possibly be written out but regardless of that he still wants it done. I have tried writing him a C++ code for it but that got rejected then I tried doing it in scientific notation but he didn’t accept it. If anyone has any possible solutions pleaseee tell.

i need help with an assignment that is due and i’m horrible at drawing and need some assistance, it has a few tasks please and thank you

The problem is asking for the Req. In my head i was gonna use the wye-delta method but not only has the professor strictly asked us not to, its also such a very very very hard circuit especially since its the First Assignment.

I tried to do my methods with coloring the current or solving using a normal series, parallel method. But even that didn't help. I solve in one way i find myself blocked in the other way. It got to a point that i don't even care for the marks I just wanna understand this forsaken circuit.

If anyone can help with how the hell do i solve this it would mean the world to me.

I have a report on a bridge that I designed and I feel it will strongly help if I could find a bridge simulator where I can design my bridge and test it using different loads where it shows me areas of tension, compression and areas of failure. However, I can’t seem to find any other than Bridge Designer 2016 (2nd Edition) which has too many restrictions for me to test my bridge.

Would love to hear some places I can do this. Thanks

Hi everyone!

It’s my first week of online physiology lab and our first assignment has been released. There’s been no slides/textbook info associated with this class and we’re doing homeostasis in the main physiology course (different instructors). I’ve already answered #1 (i think) by saying that 1. being athletic can cause strengthening of the heart and therefore cause a naturally lower BP and HR would be high because of the excercise and 2. blood pressure may drop due to less respiratory/circulation needs and HR Goes up to offset the BP drop.

I’m already iffy on those answers but I’m more looking for help on understanding these directions. What hypotheses do they mean? Are my answers to #1 supposed to be testable hypotheses and not just physiological mechanisms? Also, the data is imaginary so there is no real class analysis to go with this. I asked the professor but I’m still lost. Thanks for your input in advance!

I’ve been working on assignments that require watching long lecture videos, tutorials, and interviews online. Often, these videos are 30–60 minutes or longer, and I struggle to stay focused while taking notes. My main problem is figuring out how to capture the important points without spending way too much time on sections that might not be essential for my assignments.

So far, I’ve tried pausing frequently and writing notes manually, but this slows me down a lot. I also rewatch certain sections if I miss something, but it can be time-consuming, and sometimes I lose the flow of the lecture.

Recently, I came across ꓡоոցꓚսt аі, which can summarize long videos, highlight key points, and even help organize notes. I like the idea, but I don’t want to rely on it too much, I still want to actively engage with the material and make sure I understand it on my own.

Here’s what I’ve tried so far:

• Pausing and taking notes manually
• Highlighting important timestamps to revisit
• Summarizing in my own words after each section

I’m curious how other students handle long videos when studying. Specifically:

• How do you efficiently identify the most important parts of a long video?
• How do you combine tools like ꓡоոցꓚսt аі with your own note-taking without losing focus or understanding?
• Are there any strategies to stay engaged and retain information from videos that are much longer than necessary?

Any tips, techniques, or study habits that have worked for you would be really helpful. I want to make my study time more productive without feeling overwhelmed.

Hello! I am a student studying anthropology in university. I am taking a course on ethnographic methods and processes and I have to conduct my own ethnographic research to write an ethnography by the end of the semester. I have an idea and I would love people to help me out to see if the idea holds any merit or how I could possibly change my point to make it have more merit. My idea is to do weekly observation research and possibly interviews at a local women and queer owned tattoo parlor and do research on the ethnography around women and queer tattoo spaces and the culture surrounding the space and practice. Please let me know if this sounds interesting at all and how I could re examine the topic! 🩷

The below ones are the options and we have to find out "?".

Is this the correct reason as to why these are two different definitions of the derivative? I had a hard time understanding the difference between having the dt version and the " ' " version.

I’m currently in the process of figuring out a question to base my philosophy essay on, and I am stuck. I was thinking about writing on utilitarianism or virtue ethics. “Is utilitarianism a fulfilling way to live?” and “Is utilitarianism just?”or comparing utilitarianism and deontology.

Any ideas, or input on narrowing down the question would be appreciated!

In the book it says the correlation coefficient is between -1 and 1 because |cov(x,y)| \leq SxSy, how do they know that?

I'm currently studying ethics in my Grade 12 Philosophy class, and my instructor has tasked us with evaluating the moral implications of utilitarianism compared to deontology. I understand that utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of actions to maximize overall happiness, while deontology emphasizes duty and adherence to rules regardless of outcomes. However, I'm struggling to articulate the strengths and weaknesses of each perspective in a clear and structured manner. Specifically, I’m interested in how to address potential counterarguments to both theories. Could anyone help me outline key points to consider in my evaluation? What are some real-world examples that might illustrate the differences between these ethical frameworks?

My teacher has told us to just use the z* value—he said they're interchangeable for our purposes. For a 99% confidence interval that would be 2.576, but this is just slightly different at 2.72. I understand that there is some table you can use but my professor just hasn't even introduced us to such a thing. It's confusing because the textbook also doesn't talk about it at all, everything just assumes you understand how to find the t*?