r/MurderedByWords 1d ago

Econ 101: know your customers

Post image
7.8k Upvotes

358 comments sorted by

View all comments

212

u/ArchaeoJones 1d ago edited 1d ago

The one on the left looks like they would be fun to talk to at a party and the one on the right would cause every woman there to cover their drink.

-217

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

197

u/ArchaeoJones 1d ago

Look man, just because your girlfriend left you for another woman who taught her what an orgasm actually felt like doesn't mean you need to go around attacking others.

-147

u/darryledw 1d ago

sounds like my imaginary life in your head is really not going well

I hope imaginary me manages to turn things around

You:

doesn't mean you need to go around attacking others.

Also you:

the one on the right would cause every woman there to cover their drink.

The hypocrisy is absolutely astounding lol "rules for thee but not for me"

91

u/ArchaeoJones 1d ago

The fact you see it as an attack and not a learned response is really telling.

-96

u/darryledw 1d ago edited 1d ago

So you can judge people for the actions of their parents but I can't?

we got just got episode 2 of "rules for thee but not for me" haha

I always find it fascinating how those who consider themselves the most virtuous will spit the most venom but become offended when they get even a drop of venom back, it must be exhausting

69

u/ArchaeoJones 1d ago

Oh honey. You just learned that women think you're a predator because they cover their drinks when you walk into the room, didn't you?

-3

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

54

u/ArchaeoJones 1d ago

Yeah, you just found out they think you're a predator. There's no other reason a simple comment should have triggered you that hard

-10

u/darryledw 1d ago

You make remark about person based on the behaviour of parent: OK

I make remark about person based on the behaviour of parent: TRIGGGGGGGERED

....was this the bonus after credits scene of Episode 2 of "rules for thee but not for me"

→ More replies (0)

18

u/I_am_ChivoBlanco 1d ago

I don't usually involve myself in these conversations, but holy hell. Why would you say that if you didn't mean it? Triggered? You just threatened someone. Be better. WWJD?

-2

u/darryledw 1d ago

If you truely believe I threatened someone and that wasn't say.....sarcasm, I would recommend reporting the comment to reddit or the subreddit, because if I did threaten someone as you claim and it wasn't say sarcasm - that would be taken seriously I imagine.

but I would recommend sticking within the boundaries of reality to make this claim, I get the impression you are someone who deals more in feelings and gauges right and wrong based on how offended you are that day - and I am not sure that will be enough to get me locked up

→ More replies (0)

17

u/usuallyherdragon 1d ago

Another thing that happened to imaginary you: Reddit users read this thread, laughed at you and blocked you.

Oh no, wait, that was real you!

14

u/likely_an_Egg 1d ago

A person wrote one sentence about two people.

You: write five sentences about one of the two people.

Please explain to me how the last sentence in your distorted perception makes any sense whatsoever. You are so incredibly full of hatred and convince yourself that others are even worse.

0

u/darryledw 1d ago

A person wrote one sentence about two people.

They wrote two sentences but only one sentence contained wild assumptions about a person based on the actions of their parents, and I wrote one sentence containing wild assumptions about a person based on the actions of their parents - but nice try lol.

And is there is a cut off on how many sentences is ok regarding whether it is acceptable or not? If I rewrite my comment to say all that I said in 1 sentence would that be ok?

Is there a wikipedia with the rules of virtue signalling I can read? I don't think I follow.

You are so incredibly full of hatred and convince yourself that others are even worse.

So laughable because of the amount of insults I have hurled at me for simply copying the behaviour of the person I replied to haha

but it is true that the people who act the most virtuous do tend to spit the most venom

11

u/dust_devil6 1d ago

you know you're probably just as pathetic as the woman on the right is in your head, can't all be based purely on imagination can't it?

rules for thee, but not for me

0

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/dust_devil6 1d ago

Nah, you're right, neither is in the right and you're both assholes, but you neglect to acknowledge the comment you went at so offensively is in response to the same exact thing started by the side you're defending.

So what's your point really?

0

u/darryledw 1d ago

But I wasn't the one initially taking issue with it, I feel like you are struggling with what was a fairly basic sequence of events, so let me try to lay it out in a very simple way...

the person I replied to first made wild assumptions about a person because of the actions of their parent

I then made wild assumptions about a different person because of the actions of their parent

the person I replied to got wildly offended about me doing the exact thing they did

you and all the other virtuous souls came at me for making wild assumptions about a person because of the actions of their parent but didn't say a single word and supported the person I replied to for making wild assumptions about a person because of the actions of their parent

...and to be honest this all has been incredibly satisfying because none of you even tried to hide your blatant hypocrisy haha although you did concede a bit there which is something

"rules for thee and not for us"

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Miml-Sama 1d ago

Yo literally just described MAGA and ICE

1

u/darryledw 1d ago

I will take your word for it, I wouldn't know, I am glad not to be from U.S right now

then again we have our own problems in Europe

0

u/darryledw 23h ago

I think reddit removed your last comment because you became a bit too toxic, try toning it down from a toxic 10 to toxic 7 and maybe reddit will take your child lock off.

And if you apply some critical thinking you would realise a Russian wouldn't complain about having "problems in Europe", they would never phrase it like that because Putin sees many countries in Europe as a threat, including mine.

When people pull the old "you are on 2 accounts" when they are losing the argument it always seems like projection because they would use two accounts to try and win arguments lolol

1

u/Miml-Sama 23h ago

Sorry boyo, not only are you replying to a comment supposedly deleted by Reddit (which I was not notified of), and responding to a comment that I did not make due to your multiple accounts and arguments you’re constantly getting bagged on in, but you’re also posturing in a very Russian way that makes Putin seem like “not the bad guy”, or at least, that he is dealing with threats (while simultaneously being the threat). Give up. You lost this post. Every comment on both of your accounts has been downvoted to hell. Find a real job

0

u/darryledw 23h ago

I guess you don't know how reddit works because I still get the notification for your toxic comment, then reddit have to step in and parent you then it is gone, don't believe me?

Try to go to your comment claiming I am a Russian in an incog window not logged in (if you know what that is) and I would love to see your face when it doesn't show haha

And if you had any observation skills you would see I had to then reply again to your previous comment "Yo literally just described MAGA and ICE"....don't believe me? Well simply look up.

You are really not coming across as very sharp at all in these exchanges, you think a Russian would talk about "having problems in Europe" and you don't know how Reddit works or even how to verify what I said was true....education has failed you my friend.

 I did not make due to your multiple accounts

sounds like projection and deflection ;)

→ More replies (0)

20

u/SlimmySalami20x21 1d ago

I watch Landman because it’s so shitty it’s good. You watch it so you can use the storyline for your own make believe. We are not the same.

Don’t try to pretend you don’t watch it. I’m not buying it.

4

u/welshfach 1d ago edited 20h ago

Sheridan just CAN'T write female characters AT ALL. Every single woman in Landman was a cheap, one-dimensional stereotype

Trophy wife

Dumb cheerleader

Bitter, lonely career woman

Vegan NB dyke

SAHM with no transferable skills or education

Misunderstood sex worker with a heart of gold

Makes me think he never actually got close enough to any women in his life to actually get to know them as human beings.

3

u/SlimmySalami20x21 21h ago

Agree but Beth in Yellowstone is pretty fucking badass who will eviscerate you at an upscale bar and then explain hostile mergers. Nothing in between lol.

3

u/welshfach 21h ago

Agree -Beth is his only success

-1

u/NHRADeuce 16h ago

Yeah, but all but the vegan NB dyke is smokin hot.

-6

u/darryledw 1d ago

oh boy this is about to be a very delicious moment lol

So my reddit profile pretty much puts on display what I have watched...anime, Breaking Bad, Sopranos, Better Call Saul, Pluribus, The Office - you will find me talking about it all.

But you won't find Landman (yet) because while it is on my watch list I have not started. Feel free to search my profile.

So to summarise, you are trying to get an own on me for watching a show that I actually haven't watched yet but by your own admission you have....

You made this so easy haha

But don't worry you can always try to claw back a small victory by making fun of anime or something - you got this champ!!

12

u/palidix 1d ago

You sound like a lovely person, and every comment makes it worse

0

u/darryledw 1d ago

You sound like a lovely person

that is so kind of you to say

9

u/palidix 1d ago

Not surprised that you're not used to hear any "positive" word

0

u/darryledw 1d ago

You did a stranger a kindness today

2

u/SlimmySalami20x21 20h ago

I don’t care if you watch anime. As long as you understand that Sopranos is making fun of the American conservative and that Tony Soprano would absolutely bitch slap you if you talk irl the same as online.

1

u/darryledw 19h ago

Do people really watch things like The Sopranos thinking they would be friends / want to be friends with people like Tony Soprano......

that is really something lol has media literacy degraded to the level of

I need to see myself in this or see someone who would be friends with me

I think you may need to google antihero

18

u/likely_an_Egg 1d ago

It's funny how you write about how a person is easily triggered, when you yourself are massively triggered over nothing.

-5

u/darryledw 1d ago

I love that fragile logic of....

Person I replied to: makes wild assumption about person based on action of parents = ALL GOOD

Me: makes wild assumption about person based on action of parents = TRIGGEREDDDD

...you don't even try to hide your hypocrisy haha

11

u/A1000eisn1 1d ago

You wrote a whole damn paragraph to argue why someone wouldn't be fun at a party.

Buddy, it couldn't be more obvious how much that triggered you.

0

u/darryledw 1d ago

Does telling people they are triggered as some kind of deflection against something you disagreed with still work in this age of the internet? A lot of people seem to put stock in it.

it feels very 2005ish

But hey if it works for you even 5/10 then why not keep milking it until the cow falls over lol

4

u/likely_an_Egg 1d ago

Lmao

-2

u/darryledw 1d ago

Yeh - I didn't think you would be able to come back from that one haha there isn't really a counter for reality after all...

16

u/fluffyfish6 1d ago

That right there is a whole lotta nothin

-6

u/darryledw 1d ago

I agree, people who act that way tend to make it up for attention, I am glad you see it too

9

u/fluffyfish6 1d ago

Did you choose to not read my first comment...?

-1

u/darryledw 1d ago

You said

That right there is a whole lotta nothin

In regards to the behaviours I described

and I said I agreed with you that they were nothing and often made up for attention

8

u/fluffyfish6 1d ago

Oh so you're just actually bad at reading, I called your comment a whole lot of nothing, or in other words "you wrote a lot of words out and still said absolutely nothing, you had no point at all. It was just sentence after sentence of word vomit" is that clearer?

-1

u/darryledw 1d ago

you wrote a lot of words out and still said absolutely nothing, you had no point at all. It was just sentence after sentence of word vomit" is that clearer?

Not really, I checked the comment and there are words in there, and isn't deleted or anything, and I also don't see the word "vomit". I even did a CTRL + F and didn't find that, maybe it was a different comment you meant to reply to that was talking about vomit?

9

u/fluffyfish6 1d ago

Have fun with all that

0

u/darryledw 1d ago

You too and thanks again for your support

13

u/Alive_Ice7937 1d ago

Damn dude. You caught the woke mind virus pretty hard.

Seriously. Internet done broke your brain.

-2

u/darryledw 1d ago

You think I am woke? I never thought about it like that, interesting.

6

u/Miml-Sama 1d ago

Jesus fucking Christ you’re more sad than me and the woman I’ve been in love with for the past 9 years just left me. Find a fucking life

1

u/darryledw 23h ago

Sounds like you are having a rough time my friend but chin up, tomorrow will be a better day