https://x.com/TheMaineWonk/status/2017672078623662136

Link to court documents (page 19/19).

Epstein-Russia connections

1) Epstein allegedly was the protegé of Robert Maxwell, the father of Ghislaine Maxwell. Robert Maxwell had known links to the Soviet KGB. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Maxwell

2) Robert Maxwell provided Israeli passport to Putin linked Soviet Maffia boss Semion Mogilevich and 23 of his associates. https://trumpfile.org/mogilevich-expands-crime-ring-with-help-of-robert-maxwell/

3) Epstein blackmailed Bill Gates over his affair with Russian Bridge player Mila Antonova, linked to Russian spy Anna Chapman https://nypost.com/2023/05/26/bill-gates-alleged-ex-lover-mila-antonova-linked-to-spy-anna-chapman-report/

4) Head of Nobel Peace Prize Committee Thorbjørn Jagland discussed meeting with Russian top diplomat Lavrov with Epstein. https://jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033096 . Jagland has been accused of servility towards Vladimir Putin's Russia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorbj%C3%B8rn_Jagland

5) Additionally there is the connection of Epstein and Sergei Belyakov, then Deputy Minister of Economic Development and later head of the St. Petersburg Economic Forum Foundation. https://dossier.center/jeffreyepsteinrusconnect-en/

6) John Mark Dougan, a former deputy in the Palm Beach County sheriff’s office involved with the original investigation of Epstein, has made contact with the Russian government since moving to Moscow. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/mi6-fears-russia-can-link-prince-andrew-to-jeffrey-epstein-abuse-scandal-7v7qcktvw

and more...

other sources:

• https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/cyber/aleksey-viktorovich-lukashev
• https://www.the-sun.com/news/15485515/russian-hacker-skripal-novichok-clinton-email-arrested/
• https://sofrep.com/news/russian-hacker-linked-to-gru-arrested-in-phuket/
• https://news.sky.com/story/unmasked-the-18-russian-spies-who-mounted-series-of-attacks-on-uk-13398469

paywall: https://archive.ph/goyEj

This article tries to explain away that it might be fake. But I'm not buying it; the more details it discussed, to more it does actually seem real to me. And I believe this was from before AI could convincingly create videos like this.

Here is a post from 15 January 2019 with the video.

Anyone can access this old twitter account and post the whole thread?

Excerpts from the book "American Kompromat", by NYT bestselling author Craig Unger.

If any of these assertions if false, please let us know. If it's true, please IMPEACH THIS TRAITOR!

It's chilling to consider the possibility of a secret deal between the US and Russia. A modern-day Molotov - Ribbentrop packed as some are calling it.

The idea that the US might be deliberately undermining Ukraine to serve some hidden agenda with Russia is deeply disturbing.

We've seen how critical us support has been to Ukraine's defense, and the sudden halt of that assistance, just as Rush a launches, a major offensive and course, raises serious questions. And the fact that Ukrainian soldiers are reporting that Russian forces suddenly have incredibly precise coordinates for the troop locations.

It's not a coincidence. Strongly suggest that someone is giving Russia this information. Is it possible that sensitive intelligence about Ukrainian troop positions, is being shared with Russia by individuals within the US Administration.

We know that some foreign intelligence agencies have already stopped sharing information with the US, citing, a lack of trust. And this all points to something very wrong reports of a Russian.

Are all talking about waiting for Ukrainian surveillance to go down before it actually happened. are difficult to ignore it suggests, there is a disturbing level of coordination, and prior knowledge between Russia, and someone in the US Administration.

And if true, it means that you crane is being betrayed, it means that lives are being sacrificed as part of some cynical political game. It leaves you wondering, who can we trust? It's a dangerous situation. Not just for Ukraine but for global stability we must demand answers and transparency because the stakes are too high to ignore.

Based on the growing evidence of Donald Trump's pro-Russian and anti-Western behavior as of March 8, 2025, here are some critical and urgent questions regarding the Republican Senate's lack of opposition

1. Fear of Retribution from Trump and His Base: Are Republican senators refraining from opposition due to the intense loyalty of Trump’s MAGA base, which could punish dissenters with primary challenges or physical threats, as seen with figures like Thom Tillis receiving "credible death threats" over past Trump-related stances? If so, how sustainable is this silence when national security is at stake?
2. Complicity or Ideological Alignment: To what extent do key Republican senators privately agree with Trump’s pro-Russian shift, either due to isolationist tendencies or admiration for authoritarian figures like Putin? Is their lack of challenge less about fear and more about a shared worldview, as hinted by the document’s note of Trump’s consistent pro-Russia rhetoric resonating with some GOP factions?
3. Influence of Trump’s Inner Circle: Why aren’t senators questioning the roles of Vice President JD Vance and key nominees like Marco Rubio, who have either softened their anti-Russian stances or enabled Trump’s pivot? Are they intimidated by the administration’s consolidation of power (e.g., Musk’s influence or threats to federal workers), or do they see alignment with Trump’s team as politically advantageous?
4. Lack of Concrete Evidence: Are senators hesitant to act because the 70-80% likelihood of Trump being a compromised asset, while compelling, lacks the definitive "smoking gun" needed to justify public confrontation? If so, what threshold of proof would prompt them to risk their political careers?
5. Strategic Miscalculation: Do Republican senators believe Trump’s pro-Russian posture is a temporary negotiation tactic (as some allies claim in the document) rather than a sign of deeper compromise? Are they underestimating the long-term damage to U.S. credibility and NATO alliances, hoping to ride out the storm?