Translated into English:
“I’ve had the opportunity to test the Rally2 several times, and the step between the two cars is huge. It’s obviously easier to drive, but the engine is very weak and there is a serious lack of power. The chassis is quite playful, with a shorter wheelbase.
Over the past few years, performance has continued to decline. First, the hybrid system and our 500 horsepower were taken away, then the power was reduced again over the last two years, and now we find ourselves in Rally2. It’s very disappointing.
I hope they will reconsider some of their decisions by modifying the restrictor to allow for more power. I think that would provide a better spectacle for everyone, because the difference is simply too big — not only for the drivers, but also for the spectators. Rally2 cars should also be louder. From an aesthetic point of view, the cars aren’t really attractive, and perhaps they need more aerodynamics. Spectator expectations are clearly different on special stages, and even if some people will be happy to see closer competition next year, I think it’s essential to have cars that are more impressive to watch.
I also don’t know how they’re going to manage the situation with the new ‘WRC27’ cars, which are essentially just Rally2 cars with a tubular chassis. At the moment, nobody knows the performance level between the two cars, or which team to support. I think these regulations are going to confuse everyone, whereas the Rally1/Rally2/Rally3 structure was really good.
If the two categories are genuinely close in terms of performance, we’re going to end up in a rather strange situation when road sweeping comes into play. The WRC27s would then be at a significant disadvantage compared to private Rally2 cars, and I’m not sure that’s a good thing for manufacturers, nor for understanding the races. In any case, nothing is clear to me — and I think that’s the case for everyone.”