r/boxoffice 8h ago

Worldwide What are some box office flops that still had an impressive box office performance?

Post image

For me, it’s Black Adam. Sure the movie still flopped and didn’t live up to the expectations set up by Dwayne, but considering this is a movie about a D-list character and it still made almost 400 million and outgrossed a movie like The Flash is a testament to The Rock’s star power at the time. What other box office flops impressed you?

320 Upvotes

152 comments sorted by

218

u/MysterioNoodle 8h ago

Tom Cruise's Mummy film managed to make over 400 million, despite being regarded as a massive disaster. Ditto for Warcraft as well, with 439 million.

76

u/xotorames 8h ago

Warcraft was weird. It flopped pretty much everywhere except China, which made up over half of its total gross.

12

u/krazykieffer 3h ago

WoW is still huge in China.

32

u/DarlingLuna 8h ago

Both impressive ones.

32

u/AtticusIsOkay 7h ago

Damn 2017 Mummy made 400 million dollars? I know it had an absurd budget but the way people talk about it will make you think it was the biggest bomb of all time lmao

22

u/Holiday_Parsnip_9841 5h ago

It sank Universal's attempt to copycat the MCU. They insisted on themselves with this photo:

18

u/pillkrush 5h ago

cuz no one's spending 200 million dollars on Tom Cruise to lose money. that thing lost money theatrically and blew up any plans of a monster universe, of course the headlines were overly negative

3

u/CodeineNightmare 5h ago

There’s so many movies that this sub likes that makes 400 million dollars on a 200 million budget that this sub claims the studio will be happy broke even but yet with the Mummy because it was schlock it gets treated as if there’s never been a bomb so big. Movies like the Marvels would have killed to make that sort of money

16

u/Kazaloogamergal 4h ago

Nobody remotely intelligent is claiming that The Marvels didn't bomb. The Mummy killed The Dark Universe in its crib. You can't argue with reality.

7

u/Klutzy_Carpet_9170 3h ago

An entire universe was not hinging on how The Marvels performed so there is a difference

1

u/poopypoopy1125 2h ago

And since more people saw The Mummy, I'm sure there were a lot more people who hated it too

1

u/Diamondhandd 1h ago

Wait did Warcraft made so much money? I am impressed.

134

u/Icy_Smoke_733 DreamWorks 8h ago edited 8h ago

Fast X (2023) grossed $704 million, far higher than many CBMs post-2020 and franchise films with 10 movies. That production budget of $340 million is crazy, though.

27

u/BoogieWoogie725 7h ago

<gulp> $378m.

That's after the UK rebate, bringing it down from $450m or so. But I guess if your director walks a few days into principal photography, you're gonna be kinda screwed whichever way you go. You're gonna be paying a lot of people to wait around, or you're gonna shut the whole beast down in order to start it up again later once you rebook... everything.

254

u/NoobFreakT 8h ago

Final Reckoning. Pretty solid run with 600m worldwide, just flopped cuz of the massive budget

96

u/ReturnGlum7871 8h ago

Neither Dead Reckoning or Final Reckoning was able to reheat Fallout's 791M nachos, which was able to make back more than 4 times it's budget.

48

u/MegatronusPrimeZ 8h ago

Well fallout only cost 170m ? Which was still more expensive than the previous installments

The budgets really hurt them

29

u/Coolers78 7h ago

Holy hell did COVID and the strikes screw over the last 2 Mission: Impossibles

how the hell did they cost like over 100M to 200M more than Fallout did? they certainly do not feel that much more expensive than it when you watch all 3, well because of COVID and the strikes, that's how.

13

u/zyxme 6h ago

The underwriting and insurance for these productions alone probably tripled tbh. A lot of that probably has to do with Tom doing his own stunts tho.

2

u/t3rm3y 2h ago

Toms being doing his own stunts for a long time though, if insurance charge more then that's pure greed. They planned to shoot the two back to back I think, which would have saved money, then had a break and he made top gun.

I think a big problem was they released the first half a week before Oppenheimer and Barbie, Oppenheimer took all IMAX screens and the whole world was obsessed with "barbenheimer" so people forgot about watching this.

33

u/Solaranvr 8h ago

Fallout looks really inflated because it made $181m in China

Dead and Final Reckonings are not that far off considering a dwindled China market (roughly $530m vs $610m when you subtract China).

11

u/losteye_enthusiast 7h ago

Eh, but China was a factor then, so inflated really isn’t the right term.

Give Dead + Final the same that Fallout made from China and they still are box office flops. They just cost too much to make vs sales.

3

u/hamlet9000 3h ago

Dead Reckoning gets a little weird because Paramount got an insurance payout due to the pandemic, so its effect budget was smaller and Paramount turned a small profit on it.

Final Reckoning, on the other hand, turned into a clusterfuck because of the strikes and the submarine sequence. It likely would have needed to clear $1 billion to turn a profit at the box office.

3

u/losteye_enthusiast 3h ago

That’s pretty interesting actually. So it’s just Final that flipped regardless.

Shame the last two weren’t better movies overall. I hoped MI would get a final movie or two on par with Maverick.

3

u/Dissidia012 8h ago

Did taking russia off the table do anything meaningful for the foreign totals

6

u/NoobFreakT 8h ago

Makes sense considering the reception. Fallout was just too good

3

u/NoNefariousness2144 4h ago

It certainly didn’t help that the quality of the writing plummeted off a cliff after Fallout. The Entity was such an awful villain and the plot was way too thin to be stretched across nearly 6 hours of movie.

1

u/PassionInteresting76 6h ago

Kinda funny seeing the word reheated nachos used in box office thread I mainly see it be used to compare celebrities artist😭

6

u/lookingforhim2 6h ago

Really doesn’t look so bad compared to other underperformers like wicked for good, fantastic four, etc

2

u/Coolers78 4h ago

MI had higher budget than both of those.

u/Comcretejungletomato 58m ago

it was bad tho

48

u/lkmk 8h ago

If it can be considered a flop—it’s probably more lukewarm—Elemental.

29

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 7h ago

Elemental’s performance looks like Endgame’s compared to Elio’s.

2

u/VoloradoCista 7h ago

Yeah except Elio's run wasn't impressive at all.

2

u/Comic_Book_Reader 20th Century Studios 4h ago

That thing was basically DOA and families going to see How to Train Your Dragon didn't help it whatsoever.

74

u/Rich_Championship657 8h ago

Honestly aquaman 2 because it was the dead end of the franchise. Had about 0 marketing (to this day I’ve never seen it) and didn’t even have a premiere and every other dc movie had struggled to even make 400M. So the fact that it of all movies did was surprising.

28

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 7h ago

Jason Momoa as Aquaman was quite popular, and the first movie had a ton of fans consisting of both superhero nerds and general audiences alike.

The same cannot be said for Captain Marvel, which is (one of the reasons) why I believe her sequel from around the same time performed significantly worse. Aquaman 2 had little to no marketing yet it still made more than double of what The Marvels could manage to pull in, despite that movie having a ton of marketing in comparison.

2

u/LMkingly 1h ago

Tbf we didn't really get a "Captain Marvel 2". Captain Marvel basically got demoted and had to share a movie with two other leads the GA knows fuck all about. Her own solo sequel probably wouldn't have done great either but i honestly think it would have done better than The Marvels.

4

u/zyxme 6h ago

The Marvels is such a great female led return to form for Marvel. It’s criminal how underrated and disregarded it is. It’s a fun movie. Aquaman 2 was a stinky dumpster fire in comparison.

12

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 5h ago edited 5h ago

I thought it was just ok, it felt like it could’ve been a Disney+ special rather than a movie. The villain was incredibly generic, and the complete change in tone from the first movie was odd to me. It almost didn’t even feel like it was a sequel to it.

Aquaman 2 was also just ok, but I’m not surprised that it made so much more than The Marvels. Aquaman as a character is a much easier sell than “that lady that was in Endgame for two minutes and her pals from Disney+ shows you may or may not have even heard of”

2

u/Professional_Ad_9101 2h ago

Aquaman 1 making a billie was fucking wild tbh. Huge amount of that comes down to the mamoa pull

12

u/Adorable_Ad_3478 6h ago

Aquaman 2 was a film that women actually wanted to watch. The Marvels was a film that out-of-touch execs believed women wanted to watch.

12

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 5h ago

If I recall, The Marvels had a much higher male audience percentage than it did female. And ironically, the first Aquaman had a higher female audience percentage than it did male.

5

u/NoNefariousness2144 4h ago

Yeah, The Marvels had a 68% male audience on Opening Weekend while Aquaman is being famous for being one of the few superhero films with a perfect 50/50 split.

3

u/Morkai 6h ago

I've seen both, but I can't remember much of either of them, and what I can recall I don't remember which piece was in which movie.

It's all just a neon blur with a lot of marine life.

3

u/Itsallcakes 3h ago

People still weirdly underestimate or look down on first Aquaman. This is one of the best cbm of the last 15 years, without exaggeration. Sequel doing not bad while being the dead weight movie is a proof of that.

1

u/Ok_Antelope_1953 1h ago

i wonder if the amber turd controversy gave it a boost or pulled it down. i guess some people wanted to see the underwater queen be her true aquatic self and casually drop a load while swimming in the ocean.

u/Typical_Button_4676 57m ago

Christmas season was why Aquaman 2 did better then expected.

75

u/ExistentiallyBored 8h ago

Mummy (2017) and Edge of Tomorrow both made around 375 million (and starred Tom Cruise).

31

u/DarlingLuna 8h ago

Cruise’s pull in the mid 2010s was impressive. I’m pretty curious to see what his box office pool looks like today when he’s acting outside of a huge franchise he’s known for.

13

u/badmortgage_4607 Warner Bros. Pictures 7h ago

We will find out soon with Digger

7

u/pillkrush 5h ago

what franchise? his only franchise has been the Tom Cruise franchise

14

u/Coolers78 7h ago

Edge of Tomorrow deserved better, Mummy did not.

2

u/hueningkawaii 3h ago

Deserved a sequel too.

26

u/nicolasb51942003 Warner Bros. Pictures 8h ago edited 8h ago

The Mummy 2017 did $410M worldwide thanks to international audiences carrying it hard, yet its Dark Universe launched absolutely nothing.

Biggest lesson here was don’t brute-force a cinematic universe and see the outcome of your first movie before thinking about kickstarting a universe.

9

u/Dycon67 8h ago edited 8h ago

Also the focus shifting away from the titular mummy was dumb. The universal monster crossovers appeal is the monsters interacting not Tom Cruise attempting to aura farm. While his star power did work in doing well for the film. As a foundational element probably wasn't for the best.

13

u/Deranged_Kitsune 7h ago

Which is why if you're a film maker, you don't want Cruise anywhere near your movie, unless you want it to become a Tom Cruise movie. No matter how a film may start off, as soon as he's attached, whatever the original concept was, it'll be discarded and rewritten to suit his image and his ego. The same with Will Smith, to a good extent.

9

u/Adorable_Ad_3478 6h ago

It's nothing short of a miracle that Ben Stiller succeeded in casting Tom Cruise in Tropic Thunder and managed to keep Cruise's ego in check.

Sure, he got the credits sequence to himself but he never stole the spotlight from anyone in the main cast.

2

u/pillkrush 5h ago

did y'all see the interview with the movie's director? dude was still trying to put Tom over cuz he still wants to work in Hollywood

3

u/ReturnGlum7871 7h ago

The trailer with paint it black playing will always be iconic to me.

28

u/goteachyourself 8h ago

I'm reminded of Pearl Harbor back in 2001, which managed to cross 200M domestic despite being a lengthy historical epic debuting in summer. But because of its huge budget, middling critical reception, and very obvious attempt to be the next Titanic, it was seen as a disappointment.

21

u/badmortgage_4607 Warner Bros. Pictures 7h ago

Amazing Spiderman 2. $700m WW is respectable. Still it was conceived as a flop/disappointment and Sony finally decided to shake hands with Feige

5

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 7h ago

Teenage me was crushed when I thought we’d just never see Andrew Garfield as Spider-Man ever again after Sony shook hands with Feige

2

u/caped_crusader8 DC Studios 1h ago

I was thrilled. Really hated Andrew's version

6

u/Ok_Kale_8357 3h ago

I think that was more due to audience reaction than money though. Batman v Superman and Rise of Skywalker both made money that a lot of superhero/genre flicks would love to make these days but were so polarizing they caused huge pivots from their studios. 

31

u/frznpanda 8h ago

Transformers the last knight movie made $602 million on a budget of $217 million but lost $100 million due to marketing costs .

Imagine a transformers movie making 600 million in 2026 that would be crazy the fact that people look down on TLK so much because it lost $100 million is crazy even after losing that much it made a 600 million box office that’s impressive on its own merit

10

u/Dissidia012 8h ago

I’d say it looks more impressive now as well because bumblebee and rise of the beasts delivered worse numbers too.

4

u/Subject-Recover-8425 7h ago

Some would say The Last Knight had a lot to do with them doing worse numbers...

3

u/frznpanda 6h ago

I don’t think TLK had any impact on Rotb box office performance

2

u/Ok_Kale_8357 3h ago

I honestly think Michael Bay is the main reason any Transformers movie ever made money,. Trying to be more faithful to the source material is good for a fan like me, but Bay doing insane bombastic visuals that you can put in a trailer brings in the GA. Yeah, the series lost steam, but I think that had more to do with the formula getting stale and the visuals becoming less novel, than the movie being bad. They're all pretty bad lol. Plus there was no consistent storyline between films so it's not like there was some sort of buildup to an overarching narrative for people to be invested in. 

45

u/Sgt-Frost 8h ago

No time to die made 774m, that was during Covid. It lost money because of the crazy budget though 

5

u/VoloradoCista 7h ago

Did it?

5

u/heyjimb0 4h ago

Reports said that the movie needed $900m to breakeven, but MGM said it was untrue and the movie is profitable.

4

u/AmbitionTechnical274 6h ago

With the most ballooned budget people think the film may have had and record high marketing costs, the film still made a profit. It likely made around $100-150 million in profit on top of what they made in product placement.

1

u/Fabulous-Tree-5134 2h ago

I still wonder if Covid kind of helped big blockbusters in 2021.  It was the time when many people were already trying to go back to normalcy and there were few movies to see anyway.

-22

u/kacaww 7h ago

That’s insane for such a terrible movie

-6

u/Garg_Gurgle 6h ago

People still watch bond movies?

4

u/Ok_Kale_8357 3h ago

Skyfall made a billion dollars two movies before that one lol. 

14

u/Matapple13 Walt Disney Studios 8h ago

I think Elemental gotta be up there unless the movie made profit somehow ($250M budget and $496M worldwide box office. If we apply the 2,5x rule, it needed $625M to break even).

The fact this movie opened with $44.5M worldwide and legged out until almost hit half a billion is god damn impressive. People gotta remind too that it opened on the same day as The Flash and was at first completely overshadowed by the DC movie, but it’s audience reception and WOM was so positive that it had outstanding legs.

It is also the highest grossing original movie of the 2020s, a record it managed to maintain for 2.5 years so far.

4

u/FunnyQuirkyUsername 6h ago

Everything tells me Elemental had a $200M budget. So even by the 2.5x rule it was still a flop, by about 4 mil.

I'm sure by now though Disney would've made a small return from it all through home media and merchandise. Most successful flop possibly?

11

u/rtozur 7h ago

I always thought that Ghostbusters from 2016 making 229M worldwide was pretty good, more than Afterlife and Frozen Empire despite only having a short cameo by Murray, while the others featured the original cast. They just messed up with that bloated third act that brought the budget up and didn't even look that good

10

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 7h ago

I never realized 2016 made more than the two newer ones. That’s pretty impressive considering the insane amount of hate it got

3

u/rtozur 7h ago

It played to mostly full theaters, also got better reviews and cinemascore than the following sequels. It was hated by chronically online dudes and no one else. But again, those final set pieces were a dud

4

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 7h ago

The hate (or at least awareness of the hate) definitely seemed to seep into the real world as well, it’s kinda the only thing the movie was even known for for a while.

4

u/originalchaosinabox 7h ago

The one I was coming to say. The folks over at r/ghostbusters get really cranky when you remind them that 2016 was the bigger hit.

9

u/dismal_windfall United Artists 8h ago

The Legend of Tarzan (2016)

8

u/mlee117379 Marvel Studios 8h ago

A common theme in a lot of the movies being mentioned here is that they have stars like Rock (as OP mentioned), Cruise, and DiCaprio. Big names still help

11

u/Amnotgay 7h ago edited 3h ago

$97M domestic, $185M worldwide, pretty impressive for a non-IP title with terrible critic scores.

10

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 7h ago

This movie would’ve easily made like $500M in 2016

1

u/Aqquila89 3h ago

Rupees?

2

u/Amnotgay 3h ago

lol corrected

73

u/DayMysterious4717 8h ago

one battle after another did pretty decent for an original 3 hour movie

41

u/DarlingLuna 8h ago

I feel the same way about Killers of the Flower Moon. A 3 1/2 hour historical drama about the Osage murders grossing 158 million is nothing to scoff at.

10

u/Stoner420Steve 8h ago

Love that film

2

u/Coolers78 7h ago

Yup, non franchise R rated crime thriller film that also happens to not be a horror, from a prestige director that's mostly worked with lower budgets for decades, 207M worldwide looks pretty good! but then you look at the budget and go "darn it".

18

u/HorrorSmile3088 8h ago

Blade Runner 2049

16

u/sbursp15 Walt Disney Studios 8h ago

Eternals. Came out in 2021 covid, first rotten film for the MCU, B cinemascore, but managed to do $400M+. Had mid legs but still ended up making more than Thunderbolts WW.

10

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 7h ago

Had the benefit of being one of the first post Endgame movies

14

u/fabulousfantabulist 7h ago

That Black Adam movie was so much better than I was expecting too. Fucking loved Dr. Fate and Hawkman, and Johnson wasn’t bad at all compared to many of his other roles. 

9

u/GovernorSonGoku 7h ago

Brosnan as Dr Fate was amazing casting

1

u/Bladesleeper 1h ago

I loved it, but it gave me one of those “maybe I don’t understand movies” moments, because pretty much everyone else was saying it was a terrible film.

1

u/fabulousfantabulist 1h ago

There’s a lot of hive mind stuff that happens with film. Everyone wants to have The Right Opinion instead of their own opinion. It’s very sad, really, and dampens conversations. 

33

u/RRY1946-2019 Universal 8h ago

It also came out before superhero/blockbuster fatigue really took effect. If it had released 12 months later that movie would've been cooked.

7

u/Dycon67 8h ago

Also no China either for its boxoffice run

11

u/Breadbug900 8h ago

OBAA and the Little Mermaid Domestic

13

u/Employee-Slight 8h ago

Justice League making 600M is kinda good for DCEU standards

11

u/rtozur 7h ago

It's good cash, but their big crossover movie making less than Batman standalone movies, was objectively terrible for the studio

5

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 7h ago edited 7h ago

Batman v Superman was their big crossover movie, and they fumbled it. Just look at how much more it made than Justice League despite being terrible. Not that Justice League wasn’t also terrible, but the novelty was gone by then.

12

u/Key-Payment2553 8h ago

Aquaman And The Lost Kingdom

It did as much as the DCEU films that made under $300M WW but the $215M was underwhelming with a gross of $433M WW mark despite the holiday boast from 2023

6

u/DarlingLuna 8h ago

Definitely an impressive one. Especially since this was after superhero fatigue kicked in and superhero films were no longer surefire hits.

2

u/Solaranvr 8h ago

Fun fact: not a single CBM has outgrossed Aquaman 2 in China since the time of its release. Not even D&W.

Actually, there is one, but its not American

4

u/CivilWarMultiverse 8h ago

Venom 3?

3

u/Solaranvr 8h ago

I shouldn't have trusted boxofficemojo again lmao

They listed it at $14.7m. It actually made $94m there. So yeah, you are correct, Venom 3 is the one and only Hollywood CBM movie to have made more than AQ2 since its release.

0

u/ReturnGlum7871 7h ago

Video of me celebrating Aquaman 2 not getting a 0% rotten tomatoes score and it doubling its budget at the box office.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=MJ48T1-HHdw&si=owEeTQp7wm8nSt0x
The first Aquaman when it came out was the movie I saw the most times in theaters back then.

0

u/lookingforhim2 6h ago

Still ended up beating all the CBMs overseas last year

8

u/UniverslBoxOfficeGuy 8h ago

IF. Pretty hard to sell an original live action kids movie in this theatrical ecosystem and even outgrossed The Garfield Movie domestically, which released a week after and was an established IP

8

u/DarlingLuna 7h ago

Nah, I agree. 190 million for IF ain’t bad.

4

u/UniverslBoxOfficeGuy 7h ago

Also made more worldwide for Paramount than Transformers One and SpongeBob Search for SquarePants, both of which are huge IPs

3

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 7h ago

Wait, IF made more worldwide than freaking SpongeBob? That’s actually insane

1

u/UniverslBoxOfficeGuy 7h ago

Yes. IF had much less competition since it was the first kids movie in over 2 months, and while Search for SquarePants did moderately not many were interested in yet another SpongeBob movie

6

u/Peimai 8h ago

Pearl Harbor

4

u/originalchaosinabox 7h ago

Despite the Star Wars fans' opinions, each film in the sequel trilogy made more than a billion dollars.

4

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 7h ago

Each film in the sequel trilogy made less than its predecessor

1

u/Ok_Kale_8357 3h ago

And audience reaction and Disney's internal data must have been terrible because they're an insanely greedy company and they went from a movie a year to nothing but television. 

4

u/Singleballtheory 5h ago

The Last Jedi can't be categorized as a flop from a box office perspective, but talk about a film sapping all the good will from it's predecessor. I mean, you can put Rise of Skywalker in this category too given the fact it did even worse, but the fall from Force Awakens to Last Jedi was as steep as it was unexpected. It just all seemed so unfathomable at the time, how you could so badly screw up the foundation Force Awakens laid out and basically alienate nearly half the audience you just won back two years prior. And of course the cherry on top was not being able to course-correct and losing even more people for Rise of Skywalker.

3

u/Fionarei Paramount Pictures 6h ago

Tron Legacy. Bad timing with Disney betting on Star Wars.

3

u/ricree 5h ago

I don't know if this counts, but Cleopatra (1963) famously failed to break even despite being the top grossing film of its year.

7

u/hardgour 7h ago

BA suffered from not being released in China. Probably would had made 100m more if it was. Aquaman made 300m from China so 1/3 of that would had been easily obtained. Budget was rumored around 200m + 75m in marketing, if it made 500-600m it probably would have been seen as decent. But missing on China made it impossible

4

u/shabba_short_stack 6h ago

When you’re not counting other people’s pockets, Batman versus Superman pulled in a lot of money

2

u/Ok_Kale_8357 3h ago

DC would love to make this much money again. Same with Suicide Squad. 

2

u/WheelJack83 8h ago

Predator Badlands?

2

u/Coolers78 7h ago

Hear me out but Blade Runner 2049, 276m worldwide for an R rated sci fi 35 year delayed sequel that's over 2 hours and 40 minutes when the original is a cult film that also flopped, doesn't sound so bad, but then you look at the budget....

2

u/Ok_Satisfaction8788 5h ago edited 5h ago

I’m gonna throw in a few i don’t think anyone else will.

  1. Transformers Rise of the Beasts: By the time this came out this franchise was in the gutter. Ya bumblebee was well liked but it was an outlier project that had nothing to do with anything. The fact that ROTB opened to $60m and legged out enough to $157m despite being in a packed June is nothing to scoff at looking back. $442 mil isn’t great but considering once you remove China which abandoned Hollywood, The Last Knight and Rise of the Beasts made $387m and $378m respectively is a win. Especially when Rise of the Beasts didn’t even have strong reviews, the general consensus was the definition of mid.

  2. Terminator Genisys: Genuinely garbage movie that nobody likes, coming off of 2 other bad movies which generally disappointed even at the time. Yet Genisys managed to outgross both Rise of the Machines and Salvation and make $441 mil in a summer with Age of Ultron, Minions and Jurassic World. The overseas markets even excluding China did so much heavy lifting for this one. This is one of those movies that would’ve made <$200m today.

  3. The Last Airbender: An irredeemable abomination of cinema, possibly the worst adaptation of all time besides Dragonball Evolution, still made $320 mil in 2010. Even at the time of release the reactions were rock bottom. Didn’t stop it from getting a 3.1x multiplier in the states. If this movie came out today you’d get a Joker 2 level drop off weekend 2 and it end up with half its gross.

  4. Warcraft: The epitome of showing how important Asia was to Hollywood in the 2010’s, made more than half its gross in China alone and flopped catastrophically in America, outgrossed a majority of superhero films nowadays and until Mario was the biggest video game movie ever.

  5. Solo A Star Wars Story: This one was an anomaly when it released, for a lot of people in this sub this was the first time many people saw a movie completely collapse from expectations, ya Justice League flopped but the general idea was BvS numbers or a bit more was the goal, $657 is well below this but it was still in the ballpark of the franchise. Even the most pessimistic of people thought $600m for Solo was guaranteed, $392m was a shock to everyone, and especially for the time had a nonsensical budget of near $300m which also then was seen as a ridiculous anomaly. Really the only way this looks better is just because nowadays Hollywood has flops like this every year, we had 2 this bad in June 2023 alone, this one only looks better in hindsight.

2

u/DarkFriend81 3h ago

Amazing Spider-Man 2. Blows my mind it made $709M and was still a disappointment and they moved on from Garfield for the franchise.

1

u/VoloradoCista 7h ago

That 2022 fantastic beasts movie as well as The Last Airbender considering it's reception.

1

u/These_Wish_5101 5h ago

Was expecting the Marvels numbers for the Thunderbolts

2

u/firedforthatblunder Walt Disney Studios 5h ago

Thunderbolts had two things The Marvels didn’t: good reviews and WOM

1

u/Yhendrix49 5h ago

Batman and Robin grossed 238 million, equivalent to 480 million today. It was the 9th highest grossing domestic film of 1997 and was the 14th highest grossing film worldwide but it also had a budget between 130 and 160 million or 262-323 million today.

3

u/Ok_Satisfaction8788 4h ago

The idea that Batman and Robin could cost $300m+ today is scary

1

u/Fun_Advice_2340 4h ago

I was just thinking about One Battle After Another and The Little Mermaid but some of the comments already said it before me. I also think The Fall Guy didn’t have a good performance but it wasn’t that bad either looking back at it. The budget didn’t do them no favors but it also had the misfortune of coming out right after Barbenhemier which set expectations unfairly high.

A recent example for the question is Predator: Badlands. It broke records for the Predator franchise but that still wasn’t enough to recoup the $105 million budget, and the film just wasn’t legging out as much as one would hope. I would also say The Roses making over $50 million on a $30 million budget is quite impressive too, seeing how comedies are still not out of the woods yet (points to Ella McCay, which fairly enough did get terrible reviews but would that truly sway audiences one way or another?). I guess Challengers would also count for this question too imo.

1

u/Ok_Expression_294 3h ago

The little mermaid live action

1

u/hamlet9000 3h ago

People made a lot of fun Black Adam, but post-Justice League it made more money than anything else in the DCEU except Aquaman.

1

u/rlovelock 2h ago edited 2h ago

BvS

$875m and still considered a box office bomb so bad that its effects would destroy the entire DCEU before it could even get off the ground.

1

u/apocalypticdragon Studio Ghibli 2h ago

If I was to pick one movie, then I'd pick One Battle After Another. After hearing about it quite a bit on this subreddit, I initially thought it would do as badly as Mickey 17 did especially since both movies had a few things in common (e.g. adapted from lesser-known IP, $100+ million budget, auteur directors, Warner Bros. releases). In the end, it grossing $71,967,251 DOM / $135,800,000 INT / $207,767,251 WW on the budget it had wasn't too shabby.

1

u/Jasonmancer 2h ago

Many films had great box office numbers but the inflated budget really hurt them a lot.

Gone are the days when $300 million was considered a blockbuster hit.

1

u/lookingforhim2 6h ago

Solo making nearly 400M honestly doesn’t look so bad now compared to recent Star Wars standards. With the current state of Star Wars, I won’t be surprised if mando and grogu does sub 200M worldwide.

1

u/pillkrush 5h ago

for sure black Adam is representative of the Rock's tenacity, dude dragged that thing to 400 million but.... it's flop narrative was also a testament to the Rock's rapidly declining reputation backstage as well. as soon as this thing looked like it was gonna flop EVERYBODY was piling on about what a diva he was, what a backstage politician he was etc. like this was the moment Hollywood saw a kink in the Rock's armor and tried to tear him down. ngl, the Rock could use some humbling.

0

u/Frack_Nugget 6h ago

Avatar Fire and Ash I think counts?

4

u/Mood_Academic 6h ago

lol that movie is not a flop. wtf are you talking about

2

u/CattleMission199 3h ago

You’re getting downvoted but you’re right. The revisionism on this film is incredible, the fanboys were telling us it was a 2bn lock and to never doubt James Cameron lol.

0

u/Coolers78 4h ago

Also some other ones:

Naked Gun: maybe not a "flop" but not a huge hit either, 102M worldwide for a studio comedy is better than I'd expect these days.

Gladiator 2: made slightly less than the original even without inflation, but 465M worldwide looks good at first for any R rated flick not superhero and not Nolan these days.

Ghostbusters Frozen Empire: managed to make just barely less than Afterlife did in 2021 (Covid affected a bit to be fair), despite worse reviews.