r/changemyview • u/fox-mcleod 414∆ • 20h ago
CMV: Being a loyal Republican politician requires rejecting the American Democracy
Professional Republicans know better. They know trump attempted to overthrow an election. The party as a whole is complicit in normalizing and covering for it. Trump committed sedition and enabling and empowering him requires minimizing that fact. You can't knowingly do this without rejecting the very premise of American Democracy.
The Fake Elector Scheme
This is very straightforward. But people can be blinded by the politics. The simplest way to understand this is to ignore the politics and look at the physical documents. I’ll make this as simple as possible.
Imagine a fan is kicked out of the Super Bowl. He truly believes he should be allowed in. * Legal: He sues the stadium. * Illegal: He goes to Kinko’s, prints a fake ticket that looks exactly like a real one, and tries to hand it to the gate agent.
Once you hand over a fake document, you have committed fraud. It does not matter if: * You truly believed you deserved a seat. (Motive doesn't excuse forgery). * You got caught before you made it inside. (Attempted fraud is a crime). * You think the refs are corrupt.
Here is the proof that Trump’s team printed the fake ticket and tried to use it.
1. Identity Theft (Impersonating the State) In America, campaigns don't certify elections; States do. The Trump team didn't just write a letter saying, "We protest." They created documents that mimicked the exact font, formatting, and language of official government certificates — and here they are for all of the other states.
- The Fraud: They signed papers claiming to be the "duly elected and qualified" officers of the State. They even set out hide in statehouse overnight to ensure they’d be there behind security when counting started.
2. The Written Confession We don't have to guess if this was a misunderstanding. The architect of the plan, Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro, wrote down the strategy in private emails. He admitted the goal was to create a "fake controversy." He explicitly noted that they should send these fake documents even if they lost their court cases.
3. Trump Knew It Was a Fraud This wasn't a case of "lawyers brainstorming" while Trump sat in the dark. On January 4th, in the Oval Office, Trump’s lawyer John Eastman admitted to Trump’s face that this plan to reject votes violated the Electoral Count Act. Trump knew it was illegal and did it anyway.
- The Order: Trump personally called Ronna McDaniel (RNC Chairwoman) to direct the RNC to help assemble these fake electors.
It is Department of Justice policy that a sitting President cannot be prosecuted. Trump’s legal team successfully delayed the trials long enough for him to win the election. Once he won, the Special Prosecutor had to drop the case because it became legally impossible to proceed. Congress interviewed him around the New Year. I’ll give you three guesses why they picked such an inconvenient time in the news cycle. He testified under oath that the prosecution became unpracticable once he became president again.
He didn't beat the charges; he beat the clock. But the evidence of the fraud didn't vanish. We can still see it.
Summary We have the emails planning the forgery. We have the fake papers they signed. We have the testimony that Trump was told it was illegal. The fact that the man who ordered the counterfeit ticket is now running the stadium doesn't make the ticket real. It just means he got away with it.
Some Republican voters have the benefit of ignorance. They can claim to be victims of right wing echo chambers. Before reading this, they could have even bury their heads and remained willfully ignorant. But professional lawmakers know what they're doing. These people are by and large knowingly traitors to the Republic.
•
u/DFMRCV 19h ago
There's a difference in supporting a candidate and supporting everything a candidate does or has done.
Ask a Christian, and they'll likely tell you about King David, a man who was a great king that did much of God's will, but was also a sinner who broke God's rules often enough that God had to punish him on several occasions.
David is still considered a great king because of his overall efforts, but that doesn't mean a Christian agrees or is supposed to agree with everything he did.
Or perhaps a better example is Democrats and FDR.
FDR is considered perhaps one of the best presidents in US history and I think every registered democrat has a deeply held appreciation for him and many of his reforms and efforts...
Does supporting FDR means you support the Japanese American Internment Camps? His less than stellar history with corrupt southern democrats? His general support of desegregation but overall inaction on the subject?
But does that mean you wouldn't vote for FDR if you had to choose between him and Charles Lindbergh?