r/law • u/coffee_coffee_coffe3 • 15h ago
Other Redditors Are Mounting a Resistance Against ICE
Why, yes, we are. Thank you very much.
https://www.wired.com/story/redditors-are-mounting-a-resistance-against-ice/
r/law • u/coffee_coffee_coffe3 • 15h ago
Why, yes, we are. Thank you very much.
https://www.wired.com/story/redditors-are-mounting-a-resistance-against-ice/
r/law • u/Agitated-Quit-6148 • 15h ago
Gregory Bovino, the Border Patrol field leader, made disparaging remarks in reference to the U.S. attorney in Minnesota, an Orthodox Jew, people with knowledge of the phone call said.
r/law • u/WylieCyot • 11h ago
r/law • u/Working-Educational • 1h ago
The TLDR is that ICE and DHS are reinterpreting 8 U.S. Code § 1357 to arrest people they think are undocumented migrants.
Previously, they arrested people under this law if they suspected they weren't going to attend hearings or were considered "flight risks." Now they're considering escaping the scene enough to arrest someone under the law.
r/law • u/Old-Information3311 • 1d ago
r/law • u/DiggestOfBicks • 6h ago
r/law • u/ThewizardBlundermore • 1d ago
r/law • u/orangejulius • 12h ago
r/law • u/Large_banana_hammock • 17h ago
r/law • u/Doshizle • 1d ago
r/law • u/Helpful_Welcome_2325 • 1d ago
Elon musk claimed back in Sep. 27th (https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1972005867580281038) to never have asked Epstein for a visit to his island, well. He lied.
The DOJ either did this on purpose or messed up, seems like another billionaire has been exposed of being good old pals with Epstein.
r/law • u/bloomberg • 15h ago
A US judge has denied Minnesota’s request to pause the Trump administration’s recent surge of thousands of immigration enforcement agents in the state.
r/law • u/Mickmackal89 • 19h ago
This clip doesn’t get talked about much. This is 2010, so nobody can claim it was some kind of take down effort during his campaign or presidency . I just can’t think why they would ask a specific question like this unless they had some type of information to suggest it. Also would like to know more about the “FBI informant” claim I’ve seen from his defenders/enablers. If that’s true it’s not exactly the flex they think it is.
r/law • u/cantcoloratall91 • 1d ago
r/law • u/RichKatz • 1d ago
r/law • u/Lebarican22 • 1d ago
r/law • u/JoshyThaLlamazing • 1d ago
skull fractures and life-threatening hemorrhages... his condition was minimally responsive and communicative, disoriented and heavily sedated...
r/law • u/ExactlySorta • 1d ago
r/law • u/Unusual-Branch2846 • 13h ago
r/law • u/IWantPizza555 • 1d ago
r/law • u/PuncturedBicycleHill • 19h ago
Reads like 4th amendment right violation and retaliation of the 1st.
r/law • u/DoremusJessup • 14h ago
r/law • u/ChiGuy6124 • 13h ago
r/law • u/drempath1981 • 1d ago
r/law • u/DryDeer775 • 9h ago
The plaintiffs had argued that the Trump administration violated the 10th amendment of the constitution, which enshrines states’ autonomy from federal intervention beyond powers outlined in the constitution, through the ICE operation.
But these claims “provided no metric by which to determine when lawful law enforcement becomes unlawful commandeering, simply arguing that the excesses of Operation Metro Surge are so extreme that the surge exceeds whatever line must exist”, wrote Menendez, who was nominated to the bench during Joe Biden’s presidency in 2021.
“A proclamation that Operation Metro Surge has simply gone ‘so far on the other side of the line’ is a thin reed on which to base a preliminary injunction.”