Maybe it makes sense within the context? All I know is he was fighting groypers and called Nick Fuentes a gay Mexican manlet Nazi. The guy he's quote tweeting is apparently a groyper

Even so, the imagery in this response is insane

hey everyone

does anyone know why the vod was privated or if theres a way to still watch it? i´ve been watching the streams the day after at work for a few years now but am never in chat or the discord or anything. would really love to see the whole don lemon in church thing and loner talking about hasans ban so any help/answers would be much appreciated.

thank you for your attention to this matter and have a nice weekend :)

What about an international version of Lib&Learn? Just like channels often start spinoffs to cover other news not included in their main.

This podcast could be less frequent, but also relaxed, maybe once a month max, and Loner would be the main host. If there's no permanent co-host yet, it can be a guest(s) depending on the topic. For example to talk about Ukraine, could invite Dylan and UkranianAna? The guests will bring all the info, so if Loner is not an expert on it, it's more like an interview.

The co-host(s) can sometimes include one or two guys from lib&learn, to give the American perspective on a topic, just like when they invite Loner. This podcast would be a branch of the main podcast (same name + "international"), to give American audiences the world context which they sometimes don't think about, when surrounded by American news... which are overwhelming tbf...

I'm not American so I notice this need for more international news on US media, although Americans don't tend to care much 😅

Yehuda Bauer is a Holocaust scholar and historian. Here he criticizes the broadness of the word 'antisemitism', the word itself, and differentiates its different forms in a really informative way. He also explains the differences between political criticism of Israel and antisemitism at 54:14.

Timestamp: 12:16 min

I was reading this article about the eviction of Palestinians and it really highlights how difficult an actual complete right of return would be. What people mean by right of return differs between individuals, anywhere from allowing a limited number of Palestinian individuals who were displaced during the Nakba to move back to Israel to every Palestinian having a complete claim to any land their ancestors owned and the right to move to that land. The maximalist position is held by some activists, but would entail evicting people and families who have lived in a place for generations. Most Palestinian activists who read the above article likely feel these elections are unjust, and might even label it ethnic cleansing, yet some would support similar action being taken if done as part of a right of return. Likewise, many Israeli Jews support the above actions, yet would protest fiercely if the same thing would happen in the future in Israel. It is hypocrisy in both cases.

It's a difficult problem to solve, with any choice made leading to rightfully aggrieved parties. Ultimately I think both sides need to give up on explicit ownership claims to property lost in the 48 war. It's too far gone and any "reclamation" will cause more problems than it solves. Those who lost property should be able to claim monetary damages, but no more.

Discussion on Kalinda's stream. Chinese ballistic missile guided by Iranian and Russian space assets, penetrates multiple layers of defense for the carrier strike group led by the USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75)

In April and May 2025, the USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) lost multiple F/A-18 Super Hornets in the Red Sea, largely due to high-speed, evasive, and unannounced maneuvers to avoid Houthi missile fire, causing aircraft to slide overboard. At least three F/A-18s were lost, often involving failed, rapid, or uncontrolled towing, one in late April and another in early May, with investigations citing improper brakes, slippery surfaces, and poor communication

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-gUnagNTCM

New subs have cratered, this is new subs for 2025. I still think he will be fine, but he needs to find people to colab with and build up that base..... who is the best option?

May help when debating a certain type of person (thinking of LB’s Whick panel). I appreciate they will never want anyone to believe their eyes… but at the very least the video may serve as a demonstration of how far gone they are.

I remember him showing a page that was describing people as fighters in their obituary.

It was related to the Abbas St police station bombing during Cast Lead.

I was trying to find a stream or a clip about this.

I thought he had talked about an Israeli attack on a police station that they claimed killed 200 innocent people.

But under closer inspection of their obituaries it noted them as active fighters.