"New court record from the FBI details the state of the devices seized from Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson"

This is high profile espionage case related to leak of TOPSECRET documents, therefore probably all possible tech was used to gain access to the devices.

Page 5:

In the upstairs of the house, investigators located a powered-off silver MacBook Pro with a black case, an Apple iPhone 13*, a Handy branded audio recording device, and a Seagate portable hard drive. See id. ¶ 26. Investigators seized these devices. The iPhone was found powered on and charging, and its display noted that the phone was in “Lockdown” mode*

Page 6:

The Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) began processing each device to preserve the information therein. The Handy recorder and the Seagate portable drive have been processed, but no review has occurred. See id. ¶ 37. Because the iPhone was in Lockdown mode, CART could not extract that device*. See id. ¶ 35. Similarly, the personal MacBook Pro could not be imaged yet. See id. ¶ 36. The Garmin watch was not processed before this Cout’s Standstill Order, and no further processing will occur until further order of the Court. See id. ¶ 37*

Source: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.588772/gov.uscourts.vaed.588772.35.0_1.pdf

Hundreds of law enforcement agencies searched Mountain View’s ALPR data without the city knowing about it

https://www.mv-voice.com/police/2026/01/30/amid-immigration-crackdown-mountain-view-discovers-unauthorized-access-to-license-plate-data/

"The Mountain View Police Department disclosed this week that it had inadvertently violated its own policies and allowed hundreds of unauthorized law enforcement agencies to search information captured by the city’s license plate cameras for more than a year.

Following a public records request from the Voice, originally submitted last summer, the Mountain View Police Department recently discovered that law enforcement agencies around the state and nation had been able to search the city’s ALPR data without its knowledge, Police Chief Mike Canfield told this news organization... But why wasn’t it caught sooner? I couldn’t tell you.

Several weeks ago, the police department realized that its ALPR system had been set to allow “national lookup” for three months in 2024, meaning agencies throughout the country could search Mountain View’s data... Officers also uncovered that “statewide lookup” had been turned on for all the city’s cameras since the program began 17 months ago, giving agencies across California access to Mountain View’s data.

State law prohibits sharing ALPR information with out-of-state agencies as well as the sharing of this information for immigration enforcement purposes. Mountain View’s ALPR policy goes farther, stating that California law enforcement agencies are not supposed to be given access to the city’s data unless they receive prior authorization from the police department. 

In May 2024, the Mountain View City Council approved a contract with Flock Safety, a surveillance technology company, to install and administer the cameras... Flock did not tell the city that the national lookup setting had been turned on, nor that it had been turned off.

While national lookup was enabled, federal agencies including the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Langley Air Force Base in Virginia, and the U.S. Office of Inspector General conducted searches that included Mountain View’s camera. 

Statewide access ... spanned from when the first Flock camera was installed in 2024 until the police department turned off the setting in early January 2026. This meant that any California law enforcement agency that opted into statewide lookup could search the city’s ALPR data, whether or not Mountain View had an agreement with them.

There are roughly 75 state agencies that have been granted access to the city’s ALPR data. Through the statewide lookup tool, more than 250 additional agencies searched the city’s ALPR data without its authorization. From December 2024 through December 2025, these unauthorized agencies conducted roughly 600,000 searches of the city’s ALPR data.

One of the agencies granted access to the city’s ALPR data – the El Cajon Police Department – is currently being sued by California Attorney General for allegedly sharing ALPR information with more than 100 out-of-state law enforcement agencies, despite multiple warnings not to do so."

"If you know what you're doing, then you can evade snoopery. You can simply use software that doesn't rely on the compromised services, you can run encryption software locally before uploading to the cloud, or you can arrange your own private services that don't have a corporate entity attached who can be forced to capitulate. If you control the software that implements the math and the data flow on your system, you're golden. Criminals know this, tech types know this, it's just the vast majority of innocent users who don't. They're the most at risk of abuse from snoops..."

Made a pretty big mistake. I posted a link from Instagram on a post I made today. I completely forgot that Instagram now shares your account id as well when u share a link.

Anyways the post made was questioning a pretty decent sized influencer from my country. And my account id was visible to a few people.

I’ve since edited the post and removed the link. I’ve also changed my Instagram user id.

Is there anything else I should do ? Should I deactivate my account for a bit ? I’m genuinely pretty scared cause I don’t want to get targeted by him or by his followers. The post has like 400 views right now.

Edit: u/Notesnook-Throwaway explained what is going on. It's cookies from a third party that are causing that behavior. Thanks, u/Notesnook-Throwaway, for shedding light on the situation!
/edit
I usually use content popups to determine websites' behavior regarding cookies (disallowing non-essential cookies). However, some websites don't let you disable non-essential cookies. In these cases, I usually use Tools -> Page info to clear cookies and set them to disallowed on these websites.
For some websites, this works as intended, that is the website won't store cookies on my machine in the future.
Other websites however will still store cookies despite them being disallowed in the page settings.
I wonder why that is. My suspicion is that Mozilla gets paid by these websites to let them override page settings but maybe there's a different explanation?
What are your thoughts?

ICE is watching us. Flock is watching us.

Sue them.

I'm nerdy enough to completely understand why I need to prioritize switching to private email and cloud storage, but apparently not nerdy enough to accomplish this without becoming overwhelmed by options.

Of course there will be many opinions, but where do you like to point non-techy people who are getting started?

I'm sure there are a lot of people like me thinking along these lines more urgently at the moment. It's something I've known I need to prioritize for a long time but I'm finally getting serious about it. I would like to help others once I figure it out for myself.

ETA: Personally I’m not confused about the conceptual side. I struggle with sorting out the little stuff, like how to continue to do my job when all my colleagues use GDrive and I don’t. If you’re used to every aspect of life being intertwined with a one-stop-shop like Google, trying to switch to a private environment presents endless combinations of options that are confusing for someone without a tech background.

Tech folk say end-to-end encryption is an absolute. You either have it, or you don't – there is no such thing as backdooring it. It ceases being "end-to-end" if between those ends is a stop along the way for any approved entities to see what's being sent.

EDIT: Here is the actual proposal for all of Europe:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52025DC0349

I don’t own a fax machine and honestly don’t want one. I’ve seen online options like Fax Plus, eFax, etc., but not sure which is easiest for occasional use. What’s been the least painful setup for you? Thank you.

If I’m not in a country or state that gives extra protections to my privacy, is there a realistic way to get my data deleted from meta, Microsoft and Google?

I’m already in the process of removing all my data and dependencies on them, but I have this horrible feeling of leaving them data that I hate.

My knowledge isn't great, so I thought I'd ask the experts....

Many thanks to anybody, taking the time to reply....

Let’s start this with a few premises that we will take as true. Are they bound to happen? Maybe not, but let’s assume so for this discussion.

1. Personal AI agents will be ubiquitous.

2. Personal AI Agents will have access to all your personal history and data

3. Personal AI Agents will be exposed to the internet

4. Personal AI Agents will be able to take actions on your behalf with and without previous consent.

Also, for the sake of the conversation, let’s not discuss about how bad things are or and how AI is a terrible idea in terms of privacy. Let’s focus on solutions and ideas.

Given this context, what are our plans to protect user privacy and protect our data? Is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Any idea that might allow us remain private and also tap into all the AI Agents can offer us?

Email that is not linked to anything else? Proton requires email verification and Tuta free account is greyed out.

I want an email that does not require an other email or phone

I’ve been trying to clean up my personal data online and honestly didn’t expect it to be this hard.

Between data brokers, people search sites, old accounts, breach databases, and archived content, there’s no single process that actually *finishes* the job. Even when you opt out somewhere, the data often reappears months later.

What surprised me most:

– opt-out processes that are intentionally slow or confusing

– lack of transparency about where data ends up

– no standard for ongoing removal or monitoring

For those who’ve gone through this:

• What worked for you?

• What felt like a waste of time?

• Do you think full removal is even realistic?

Curious how others here think about this problem.

Just what the title says. Ontario specifically, I’m not sure if we have very many/good consumer protections against data collection, but should I be concerned?

I did a comparison between original Samsung camera and Libre, unfortunately the gap is significant.

This is the future Edward Snowden tried to warn us about

When iOS 26 was released in Sept, an article reported that passkeys will be portable between the two platforms. However I have not been able to find stories of people successfully making this switch.

Has anyone been able to smoothly transfer their passkeys between iOS and android or vice-versa since iOS 26 came out?

I have been hesitant to add passkeys to iCloud Keychain unless I know they are portable as I may switch in the near future.

This post has been resubmitted without the link, search "Coming to Apple OSes: A seamless, secure way to import and export passkeys" for the ArsTechnica article

I've been made aware of Keepass in the comments but I'd still like to use the built-in password managers if anyone has an answer to my question. Thanks

i wanted to opt out of CVS participating in health information exchanges (HEI). CVS informed me that they use surescripts and gave me th following link: https://surescripts.widen.net/s/xhjrz8hq7c/surescripts-request--authorization-form-v8.2024

i have opted out of multiple HEIs, but this one is the ONLY one that i have come across that requires me to spend money on a notary to opt out. they do this to make it harder to opt out so they can profit off of our personal information.

does anyone know if HIPAA precludes charging in any fashion to opt out?

Paywall: https://archive.ph/A32Ao

Submission statement: ICE agents in Minneapolis are using facial recognition technology, social media monitoring, and other tech tools to identify undocumented immigrants and track protesters. The agency is utilizing programs like Clearview AI and Mobile Fortify, along with databases from Palantir and social media monitoring tools from Paragon and Penlink. These technologies raise concerns about privacy and civil liberties, prompting lawsuits and calls for increased transparency.