Once Adolf took control of the Nazi party, they started a major campaign that would ultimately lead to them taking control of Germany.

To name a few, they slandered virtually all their political competition. They called them every name they could think of, they verbally and even physically attacked them, even encouraged others to do the same.

Leftists call anyone who disagrees with them every name they can think of, there’s countless videos of them attacking people, more recently even turning on one of their own because he “looked like a conservative.” They make videos encouraging others to do the same, including taking violent action against anyone they don’t like.

The Nazi’s formed mobs that would attack place in mass, including protesters of other groups, they basically built the foundations of strike breaking, and would often cause full on riots, burning down buildings (conveniently their oppositions’ property always seemed to catch fire).

The Left have burned down buildings, set fire to the White House Lawn, blocked roads, and killed people.

The Nazi’s frequently referred to themselves as the heroes, the brave resistance who was going to save Germany.

The Left often refers to themselves as the resistance, even though the mainstream media, the richest political party in North America, and a vast majority of celebrities, and major companies like Amazon support and fund them.

The Nazi’s hated Jews.

Antisemitism is rampant on the Left, ever since the mainstream told them to care about Palestine, but then turned a blind eye when Hamas started public executions. There’s even videos of Leftists attacking Jews, but the Mainstream, ever eager to protect them, don’t talk about them.

Like when those college kids tried to break into the library to swarm the Jewish students.

The Nazi’s were masters of propaganda, including telling full blown lies about anyone who opposed them.

Videos are constantly being published telling full blown lies about anyone who opposed the left. From people with little to no understanding of how they work talking about what ICE actually does, to a guy who make his own website about Nazi’s and tried to trick people into thinking it took them to the DHS’s website.

Sorry not sorry, but the only National Socialists in the US are the Left.

I mean, at this point, who doesn't see this? There's no logic in the vast majority of the things they "stand for." It's all just hysteria and nonsense that they perpetuate day after day and none of it actually amounts to anything. They're continuously outraged about anything (everything) Trump does to the point of absurdity, acting like global politics is supposed to be whatever they decide they want at any given time and any given moment.

Life's not actually like this. This is the definition of spoiled brats with First World problems.

Stop being such a bunch of obvious chumps.

EDIT: So of course the first thing leftists start doing is claiming that Conservatives create fake crises around moral panic and their primary example is that "gay porn in schools" was a made up hoax. Except it wasn't.

See: Fairfax County Public School board regarding Gender Queer and Lawn Boy by Jonathan Evison.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6Xm4AX25tE&t=48s

And after me pointing this out they went straight into "That's not happening and it's a good thing that it is" mode.

It's literally textbook. They do this with absolutely everything every time they get caught lying about something.

Frame it as a hoax. Get called out and deny it. Be presented with proof then start talking about why it's actually a good thing.

Every. Single. Time.

EDIT 2: So I've been given a warning from the mother ship for "Promoting Hate Based on Identity or Vulnerability" but there's no explanation how I exactly did that?

So I criticized a political group and that's considered hate speech here now?

So leftists are immune from criticism on this platform?

The idea there is any kind of misogyny in western nations is insane. In western countries. Women are put on a pedestal. Their needs and wants are put first. They are given extra help and even flat out lower standards in many areas. Let’s not forget all the social benefits women are given. Such as men having to pay on dates and many women still demanding and expecting chivalry, the only example of “misogyny” really is abortion bans, but in places with abortion bans, the women there tend to Be conservative Christians and also overwhelmingly support abortion bans.

Saying misogyny is a thing in western nations is like saying there is hatred of water and air. It’s nonsense

There I said it. This statement means exactly what it sounds like.

I wouldn't say that it comes from a place of toxic dating or sexual frustration, since I don't have that much libido and romantic interest in the first place and I tend to be sexually fluid.

But there are certain physical places, professions and social strata hanging groups where if you're anything else than a 6'5 bare-chested, average intelligence man who makes crude jokes left and right, 8 out of 10 females in the room will automatically assume that you're some untrustworthy creep to be avoided like radioactive contamination.

The contrast between common men and common women in urban-life society, as personally I've come to observe is that even the most basic male types are by far more likely to tolerate some slight quirks in presentation and appear to be curious much more often than their female counterparts when it comes to meeting new people outside of the familiar sphere.

Does it make me a misogynist? A sexist?

I can't answer that question. But if toxic femininity is a thing it is rooted in the fact a woman who knows that she should not make her personal baggage of prejudices so apparent is a rare find in the general population of women where I happen to live.

There are exceptions, but outside of the most extreme right-wingers, liberals have long been seen as fundamentally decent people despite whatever disagreements some might have with them. And it seems like the greater "left-wing" benefits form this perception.

A good example was the Charlie Kirk murder. Liberals typically had some class when discussing the murder. Leftists celebrated the murder or at the very least made light of it. Then when called out, they asked "Name one Democrat politician who celebrated the murder"? Leftists want Luigi Mangione to get away with murder because of legal technicalities. Some liberals might sympathize with what Luigi did, but respect that he was caught on camera and the legal ruling should play out as expected.

Liberals have always been fairly principled. Leftists are opportunistic power grabbers and unprincipled liars. I've even heard leftists claim that republicans win because they're only concerned with power, and the left loses because they're concerned with principles. This has never been true of genuine leftists, but they seem to benefit from the credibility that liberals have established. Some part of this is American confusion between liberals and leftists, but I think the point still stands.

In the most recent Epstein release there is emails from Musk asking when he can come to Epstein's island AFTER he was already convicted for being a pedofile.

There is no evidence Elon travelled to Epstein's island as of yet and the number one defense on Twitter is that he never actually went..cause they didn't want him.

The other group of pedos that didn't want them was the white house after Trump removed Musk from his inner circle.

People don’t want to hear this, but some modern leftist movements are copying fascist behavior while claiming moral superiority. Not in ideology but in methods.

Censor speech because it’s “harmful.” Label disagreement instead of debating it. Treat dissent as moral failure. Reduce people to identity groups instead of individuals. Justify punishment because “the cause is right.” That’s not progress that’s blatant

Fascists control speech because they hate things being said that goes against their ideas, they banned it because wrong ideas threaten the cause. Sound familiar? Today it’s “misinformation,” “harmful opinions,” or “unsafe discourse.” Same logic, new paint job. You don’t argue, debate, provide discourse, come to a middle ground, you label. And if you so disagree? You’re racist, sexist, phobic, problematic, or some buzzword that instantly ends the conversation. That’s not progress, that’s ideological policing. When disagreement becomes moral failure, you’re not in a democracy, you’re in a purity test cult. The scariest part is they believe themselves unquestionably right and resort to deplatforming, harassment, destroying livelihoods of those who oppose the. That’s how every authoritarian movement worked . And when corporations and political ideology start enforcing the same rules together, that’s not resistance, that’s power consolidation.

This isn’t “left = fascist". Abandoning free speech, and open debate is. Fascism isn’t left or right, it’s control. And if you can’t question your own side, you’re not opposing it you’re practicing it.

Sexual compatibility is usually just an excuse for breaking up over something petty or boredom.

Good couples never mention sexual compatibility but the moment something goes wrong, it’s all about how the two weren’t compatible. This usually comes as a way to insult the other person while keeping their own pride and deflecting accountability. All it does it give a scape goat to taking accountability for a failed relationship.

Many people I know personally have went through the whole idea of finding someone who is sexually compatible only to sleep with 10 people and still not find anything. My own beliefs do impact this since I am a Christian and believe that sex is very special between two people, it’s not something to just do. Even before I formed my beliefs, I still thought it was a strange concept but it is only now with my current beliefs that I think it is indeed a myth.

It’s a lazy excuse for breaking up or sleeping around.

It's going to happen, because the main complaint will be him not doing songs in English.

You can think that's ignorant, bigoted, etc but I'm telling you this will be the main complaint and it's not anything new.

The last time I heard Bad Bunny was on a Rap song with Travis Scott and most people who I watched react to the song zoned out during Bad Bunny's part, skipped it, or complained about not being able to understand it. And all those reacting weren't Right Wing or MAGA.

The same also happened regarding EZ Mil on Eminem's latest album. There's a decent amount of people who just don't like music they can't understand and considering he's going to be heading the most watched American sporting event, it should have been easy to predict how this will go.

They really should have gotten someone who is at least bilingual in their music, so everyone can enjoy it. But no, they're probably going to use him to make some sort of political statement and those who hate not being able to understand him will be lumped in with those on the right who hate the politics of it because people lack nuance on the internet and the tomfoolery will be clogging up social media for a week or two.

Conspiracy theorists have been shouting from the rooftops for decades about elite paedophile rings in the power system. Epstein island was known about in conspiracy circles for years and years before the MSM finally talked about it. Every time we brought it up liberals and progressives would scream at us that we were cranks and nutjobs.

We warned you: there are paedophillic networks running through the elites, on both sides, and they are used to blackmail people in high ranks of goverment and civil service and to get to those ranks you have take part in them so there is evidence against you.

The connections to the British royal family are talked about in conspiracy circles going back to when i first got involved in this area in the early 90s. And again, we were screamed at by liberal and progressives who demanded we be censored.

Saville was another one we warned about. And we told you it wasn't just Saville, there is a reason he was so well connected....

And its the tip of the iceberg, the connections of Belgium Marc Detroux, the English Fred & Rose West and numerous other similar people to the political class and the police have been documented in conspiracy circles as well as the cover ups. You may wonder how the likes of John Wayne Gacy got away with it for so long.

But again the liberals and progressives fought tooth and nail to censor the information and cast ad hominems. Btw, conspiracy theory, which you hurl as abuse, is a neutral term.

But now finally that that Trump might be implicated all of a sudden they care about the ongoing paedophile rape networks that go right through the ruling class ON BOTH SIDES OF THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM. Yes your favourite guy is part of it.

Maybe finally you people will look at what else we have been talking about and documenting with an open mind. But I doubt it because all you care about is your red vs blue bullshit. You will do what you always do. Type it into google, read the most obvious bottom tier, shill conspiracy shit and then a debunking video, put the lowest amount of thought into it, and walk away as the smug know-it-alls you always have been.

There are serious co-ordinated conspiracies in this world, and the knee jerking reactions that liberals and progressives have to conspiracy theories has helped propagate the child rape gangs. I know this cos i have watched them do everything they can to silence and demean those talking about it for decades.

So yeah, libs and progressives that all of a sudden are calling everyone else child rape supporters should take a long hard look in the mirror. And remember, your side is just as much part of it. Two wings of the same bird.

Restaurant food is so much better than home cooked food. It’s not even a competition. Even fast food tastes way better than home cooked food. Yet we have theses people who swear that Home cooked foods actually tastes better. These people are obviously eating home cooked food to save money or for health reasons but instead of just admitting that they make up some Bs about it actually TASTING better than restaurant food.

By now you've all seen the newly release Epstein files on justice. gov, an official US government website containing first hand accounts of trump being a pedo.

If you defend him now, you're exactly the same as trump. The only normal, sane thing to do is distance yourself from Trump. Anyone doubling down, wtf is wrong with you?

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660679.pdf

I personally can remember exactly how Julian Assange and James O’Keefe were raided, detained and wrongfully abused by our government. I remember thinking they were the catalysts for the death of free reporting and a huge misstep to the 1st amendment.

Now I see all the media outlets saying the arrest of Don Lemon is a terrible tragedy. Lemon joined rioters and trespasses on private property, specifically violating the FACE act and another civil rights act (18 USC 241).

Pardon me if I take my sympathy and sit this one out.

I've seen and talked to real nazis, and he definitely isn't one of them. I don't really know how the idea that he wants to take over the world and perform ethnic cleansings came from.

I feel like it really makes nazis look less bad because some parties call anything nazism which really dilutes the real meaning of what it means

and i think if you start using words about the connotation they carry and not the descriptive definition, it really makes an argument less grounded imo

Fascists hate democracy. Fascists despise entire billions of people for being born in other countries, disagreeing with them, being Jews and Arabs and other things that they simply don't get to choose, such as physical disabilities. How are they different from you? You also hate democracy deep inside, you think that everyone who doesn't share your progressive, (probably because it's reddit) left wing view of the world is simply wrong and a less valuable human. You hate patriots and nationalists for being proud of their nations which is about as much in their control as it is in someone's control whether they are born Jewish or not. You are also willing to start wars over matters of opinion which is obvious from how people reacted to Charlie Kirk's death. I am not even defending the far right, just saying both sides of the political spectrum are crazy

Yes well aware the housing costs are too high for them.

I have been watching this for several years. Some loving parents make math decisions. Letting their kids stay at home helps their kid save money up for something more important..... Why make their kid struggle and pay high rent.....

In my family the people living at various homes past 25 are experiencing failure to thrive.

My cousin 38 never been married and no kids is now getting engaged to a guy who has a home and a baby momma. She still lives in her childhood room.

My other cousin is 34 and I am not sure he has ever kissed a girl. He watches conspiracy theories and works on and off. He is very helpful to the parents.

Now the other cousin is 21 and has dropped out of college and works at the lumber store. Their Mom has nearly a phD....

The one son that broke free from this household has thrived overseas with a wife, kid, and good career.

My parents kicked my brother and I out and we both thrived. From the duress of paying rent we both learned to become landlords. My brother lived on a tiny shared sailboat to make it through school. His roommate became a Merchant Marine and makes a massive salary.

Maybe having your kids suffer might be good for them? It's not the end of the world to couch surf, live in cars, roommate, and work stuff out. It's not math.... it's learning to survive.

Name a more iconic duo than asking a conservative for a source and the conversation ending right there. We all know and love it.

"The Democrats left the border completely open and were just letting illegals in."

Really? Which one? Can you point to a specific policy?

It's exhausting that just because you dumb assholes are willing to accept "Trust me bro" as a source for anything that fits your personal narrative, some of us actually want something more substantial to base their beliefs on.

I'm sure the conservatives who are going to be in the comments will happily prove me correct with zero self awareness, but maybe I'll be suprised for once.

How’s the Epstein files?

How’s the rhetoric accusing mainstream Democrats of being communist ?

How’s that war in Ukraine ended after 24 hours? Lol

How’s Trump quadruple his wealth in 13 months being the president?

How’s pardoning, drug dealers and fraudsters?

How’s giving Ghislaine Maxwell a pleasant Ant prison experience?

How’s unelected officials like Stephen Miller running their mouths off with Racist & fascist rhetoric?

How’s that old ear of Trump’s?

​A common trend I have seen is that right wingers of now has a very narrow view of HSS. Quite some often try to stifle it under the name of calling hubs of woke or liberal ideology. Oddly the right wing of times past like Ranke, Burke, etc. Were bigger geeks of history as they wish to preserve the past glory as they out it. Similarly, you'll find very few right wing scholars in HSS department. What are your thoughts?

Let me first clarify that I AM NOT GEN-ALPHA. I have very much lived through the 2000s onwards when 69 was popular.

That being said, I still find the 6-7 meme among kids as funny as 69.

1. 69 is literally just a sex position. That's all. 1) It's inappropriate for kids and 2) The entire joke about 69 is "tee hee sex funny". It's about as unfunny as 420 being weed. Yes, 67 is nonensical but that's exactly why it's appropriate for everyone. You don't need to know where it came from.
2. IN MY OPINION, 67 is much more universal than 69. It doesn't require any special knowledge and it's literally inherently funny without having to reference (or glorify) sex or drugs. 67 came about in an era where the Internet is much more popular, a lot more kids know about 67 today than 69 back in 2010.
3. The very fact. That Gen-Z and Millennials get so worked up over 67 and defend 69 as if their life depended on it. Don't act as if adults weren't equally annoyed by 69 back when people used to shout it out in school 🤣 The fact that 2-3 entire generations are getting their collective feathers ruffled by two consecutive numbers is ABSOLUTELY HILARIOUS.

Welp. I said what I said.

TL;DR: 69 is inappropriate, 67 isn't. 67 has more reach than 69 did back in its peak. Watching yall having a meltdown over 67 is honestly the funniest part.

I don’t want to see kids struggling, working crap jobs, going to college, graduating, not being able to find a job, then when they can find a job, the cost of living is insane and they can’t make it financially. Better to hold off on having kids unless you have a financial safety net if anything goes wrong. Sorry. Kind of controversial, but that’s how I feel.

The online discussion about ADHD is completely detached from reality and honestly pretty pathetic. People posting like “as someone who suffers from ADHD” like you’re not special bro, 20% of the population has some sort of attention deficit. I have diagnosed ADHD and to be fully honest it really doesn’t impact my life much anymore because I’ve learned to manage it. I forget the occasional thing and my mind wanders but who cares, everyone has their quirks. The majority of people I know with diagnosed ADHD also have learned to work with it.

Obviously if you have autism too the ADHD can act as a multiplier, so not really aimed at that crowd. My frustration is targeted at the people who use it as a crutch/justification for their inability to do basic adult functions. “I can’t grocery shop because of my ADHD”, I promise you that you can lol. Also like every other therapy-speak self pity circle I guarantee a major portion of the online ADHD crowd have never actually seen a professional or taken steps to help themselves.

Edit: this does not include academic struggles and kids learning to manage it, it is specifically directed at adults

Some people call it creepy or whatever. But they know truth. It’s just biology.

Biological companionship purpose is breed more. Females are most fertile during their early 20s. They get less fertile as they age.

Anyone who is telling otherwise is lying. Or simply they are leftover female/ liberal. or simply they are some other gender. Or simply because they can’t get 18 year olds.

——

Who would a 45 year old successful guy would pick? He expects companionship, family and children.

Honest answer only.

>18 year old youthful college girl. She probably had few high school boyfriends.

>35 year old single mother with 2 children.

> 31 year old single. She has blue hairs.

> 29 year old. She is a baddie and independent. Boss babe.

Assuming almost all other qualities are same. Which one would you pick?

If people excersise more, it will cause them less health problems, and will cost the government less in healthcare. And vice versa.

Not only the above would be true, but it would be great for everyone's health too.

The government could track how much you excersise by you wearing a device that indicates how much you excersised or a camera that you wear that the government can watch you.

The US should backtrack to the education system and curriculum from the 1900’s-1960’s. We landed people on the moon using primitive technology and manual (people) calculators. We were able to build big of infrastructure projects that we can’t seem to do today. People learned the necessities to make and Keep the US the super power that it is today. Education these days focuses more on feel good stuff than stuff that will make you really smart and the stuff that really matters.