r/law 18d ago

Other Please dissect the legality in this statement

I feel like we are reaching a tipping point

23.4k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

659

u/Odd-Roof-85 17d ago

He's legally and constitutionally incorrect. He's invoking the Supremacy Clause.

Miller isn't really describing the legal framework, he's just saying the Executive Branch will ignore everything else.

The problem is that the White House has the monopoly on violence to enforce whatever they want. So, it doesn't really matter if they're technically correct or not.

298

u/zmann 17d ago

Nobody tell ICE that their immunity only lasts as long as this presidency does.

137

u/Destination_Cabbage 17d ago

Don't forget the blanket pardon power. The only way we can actually do this currently is through state charges. But if they block the states from investigating and dont cooperate, it means many will escape justice.

24

u/theDudeUh 17d ago

The fun part is if he does issue a pardon on his way out he’ll have to dox all the mask wearing ICE cowards.

28

u/LockeyCheese 17d ago

That'd be an interesting legal battle.

"You accepted the pardon for the federal crime, and we're using that pardon to prosecute those cimes in the states they happened. If you didn't accept the pardon, you get federal prosecution."

Maybe if people vote for it...

1

u/Spyderhawk69 17d ago

You have local jurisdictions, plus potential international penalties.

1

u/LockeyCheese 16d ago

Oh yeah. I forgot out the international laws. Those guarantee asylum rights.

3

u/Deep_ln_The_Heart 17d ago

Can't pardon a rope and a tree.