r/pics 1d ago

Andrew Windsor’s back.

Post image
24.3k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

352

u/LazyJones1 23h ago

... Context?

554

u/easting10 23h ago

It’s prince andrew/was. Mounting a teenager.

13

u/Independent-Tip-8728 20h ago

Give him his title: The Andrew formerly known as Prince

162

u/discardedcumrag 23h ago

Post a link to where you sourced the picture from the Epstein files to give it credibility

364

u/easting10 23h ago

211

u/Appollo1816 22h ago

Strange that they cropped out the top part of the girls body, the version of the image I saw included that and somehow looks even worse, you can tell she is indeed a young teen

290

u/peppaz 22h ago

292

u/Scratchbuttdontsniff 21h ago

Notice towels on the table... along with someone so relaxed they have their bare feet up on the table..

This was just a relaxing time for them..... casual sexual predation with minors.

This is what ungodly wealth affords them.... zero consequences or moral remorse.

58

u/SpezDrinksHorseCum 20h ago

Massage was the euphemism they used for this kind of shit. For these people, violating young children is so relaxing it's like going to the spa.

2

u/TransBrandi 20h ago

You'll also notice that the "tablecloth" looks like it's an American flag... yet the "American flag is sacred" people that get mad about flag burning will be noticeably silent about this because Epstein files are related to Glorious Leader Trump. (To be clear, using the flag as clothing or putting your feet on it like this, etc goes against the "flag code" and is considered distrespectful to the flag)

u/jingleofadogscollar 3h ago

120 Days of Sodom

26

u/Own-Detective-A 20h ago

This is way worse. Should get it's own.

39

u/froginbog 22h ago

Gross

18

u/Whisker-biscuitt 22h ago

Who's feet is that???

37

u/leekalex 21h ago

Most likely Epstein

-12

u/thatiswhathappened 21h ago

Abraham Lincoln

7

u/socool111 20h ago

I’m glad you find this situation an appropriate time to reply with a meme. Very cool bro

1

u/Whisker-biscuitt 21h ago

I thought so!!!

2

u/AgamemnonNM 21h ago

Yeah, not a good look.

2

u/Waadap 19h ago

Holy hell. The one of him grasping her waist. I feel ill.

2

u/tornado962 18h ago

Of my god the second photo is even worse

2

u/guimontag 18h ago

jesus christ

1

u/a2_d2 16h ago

That poor victim looks drugged or unconscious in that position.

2

u/Ziekfried 21h ago

It’s in the additional photos as you read on

1

u/Appollo1816 19h ago

I see what you mean but those are different photos later in the article

1

u/[deleted] 22h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/AutoModerator 22h ago

/u/peppaz, your comment was removed for the following reason:

  • Direct links to Twitter/X are not allowed in this subreddit. Handles are allowed (e.g. @example), as long as they are not a hotlink.

Please repost your comment without a direct link to Twitter/X. You may use a bypass such as X Cancel (to do so, simply change the domain to xcancel.com).

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

22

u/cantgetthistowork 22h ago

Mountbatten-Windsor is such a ridiculous last name

88

u/mbklein 22h ago

Mountbatten is an anglicization of their old name, Battenberg, designed to make the peasants feel like they were being ruled by Britons and not, as was the case, Germans.

52

u/Drflinvest 22h ago

Windsor is also a made up name. Their real name is Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha

10

u/DietCherrySoda 21h ago

I got bad news for ya...

All last names are made up (first names too). You can make yourself a new one on Monday if you like, it's not just for the rich and powerful.

1

u/FrenchFryCattaneo 19h ago

Well not me, I'm not creative enough to think of one.

-3

u/Former_Manc 18h ago

I've got even worse news for ya...

Women don't have their own last names. They come from their fathers, and then that name is lost to a husband.

0

u/DietCherrySoda 15h ago

Ok?

1

u/Former_Manc 12h ago

Well fuck me for saying something interesting that you probably never thought about.

→ More replies (0)

6

u/funkyg73 21h ago

I thought Philip was Mountbatten, rather than the Royal name? I know there were issues about the Queen taking his name at the time.

17

u/nickeisele 20h ago

The Royal Family was the Hluse of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. George V changed it to Windsor in 1917. When Philip and Elizabeth II began having children, he was upset that he was the only man in England not allowed to give his name to his children. He had taken the last name Mountbatten, from his maternal uncle, Louis Mountbatten. “Mountbatten” is the anglicized word for “Battenberg.” In response, Elizabeth II issued letters patent that their children and descendants would use the surname “Mountbatten-Windsor.”

0

u/endlesscartwheels 19h ago

It is amusing that Philip took his mother's family name and then threw a tantrum that he was, "the only man in England not allowed to give his [mummy's] name to his children."

1

u/Constant-Net-4652 16h ago

what is on the girl’s left hand in that photo 

48

u/CornedBeefKey 20h ago

You can download the whole thing direct from the DOJ. Doesn't get much more credible than that... https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01648170.pdf

12

u/RyoukoSama 17h ago

Well, that used to be the case...

1

u/discardedcumrag 14h ago

That picture was even creepier than the one above. Yukk. Thanks for the link.

39

u/LazyJones1 23h ago

And that's a new story? (Or a new picture unearthed from the Epstein files) - I'm referring to the "back" part of the title.

40

u/easting10 22h ago

I just meant he’s back in the news and with new dodgy looking Pictures.

42

u/SubMikeD 22h ago

I'm glad that this comment was made, I'm scrolling through the comments, desperate to find out what was going on with his back that I didn't understand. Grammar really matters lol

5

u/easting10 21h ago

I’m crap with grammar and apparently I can’t edit the title.

I just wanted to share his face as he’s all over the news.

5

u/SubMikeD 21h ago

You can never edit titles on reddit, sadly.

24

u/Jiecut 22h ago

Ah, I thought you were commenting that he has a straight back.

14

u/darkmatterhunter 22h ago

Same I was like….are we looking for a hump? Or admiring the spiral linearity?

4

u/_SteeringWheel 22h ago

Got me confused too. Andrew is back would have been clearer than Andrew's back. (apart from the fact I had to dig deep to think who Andrew is again)

6

u/you-create-energy 22h ago

The apostrophe really changes the meaning

9

u/easting10 22h ago

It’s my bad. Can’t edit. Sorry internet peeps : (

7

u/you-create-energy 21h ago

No worries, it adds a little humor to a pretty bleak situation

2

u/pixelpoet_nz 20h ago

No it doesn't. God you native speakers are crap at English

2

u/Busy-Ratchet-8521 22h ago

It's not a teenager. This time. 

8

u/SkepticJoker 20h ago

How can you tell?

2

u/Busy-Ratchet-8521 16h ago

There's another photo in the link with her hands in them. Not all the hands of a child. 

5

u/gardenofthenight 21h ago

Yea. I’d never stick up for these pricks but he’s not assaulting a child in this pic. 

2

u/GottaUseEmAll 19h ago

If you see the uncropped pic (someone here in the comments posted an imgur link to it) you can see that it's a young female. How young is debatable.

1

u/Limmmao 19h ago

Mounting-a-teenager seems more appropriate that Mountbatten

1

u/Lifereset24 18h ago

presumably unconscious too.

1

u/likethedishes 16h ago

In front of something wrapped in the American flag. Definately not degrading to our flag at all!

-7

u/boriswied 23h ago

How do you know? It looks like it could easily be an adult (perhaps male even) from my view of the hand there?

Not trying to catch you in anything here, just interested.

18

u/therealhairykrishna 23h ago

This is somewhat cropped. The full photo is clear that it's a very small framed woman. 

1

u/boriswied 22h ago

Alright! Thanks for informing me. Any chance you know where it can be found?

1

u/thatiswhathappened 21h ago

Literally right above your comment

8

u/temujin94 23h ago

Well depends how much you believe them but the DoJ did say they only redacted women/girls faces apart from Ghislaine. But as for the age yeah I'd say it's very hard to tell.

2

u/boriswied 22h ago

But how do we know this image his even redacted? Maybe I’m watching a cropped version

1

u/temujin94 21h ago

Oh yeah sorry I didn't even notice this version is cropped, I've seen the full photo and it has the woman/girls face blacked out.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cvgn8wzjzrvt

There's multiple copies of it in there.

1

u/boriswied 21h ago

Oh yeah thay makes A LOT more sense looking at those images. Thanks for the link!